• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evaluate historical comparisons of Hitler and Stalin and their regimes

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Sara Luke Evaluate historical comparisons of Hitler and Stalin and their regimes "Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely, great men almost always are bad men." Lord Acton 1887 No other men could fit this description of power and corruption more perfectly than Hitler and Stalin. Throughout history they have been both idolised and demonised leading to the overwhelming fascination the world has with them. Both successfully rose to heights of power in their own countries which was unprecedented, they were able to manipulate the public, had strong ideologies and regimes and between them they were responsible for the deaths of millions of innocent people. Although on the surface these two men were political opposites, Hitler a socialist and Stalin a communist, neither were in fact really either. Instead they used their political stance as a podium to gain power and control. Eventually they both evolved into "totalitarian dictators" with the ultimate goal of absolute power and European domination. So perhaps Lord Acton's theory was correct that power is the evil force which corrupts men. Both Hitler and Stalin were ambitious, power hungry men whose regimes began to turn more sinister as they gained more power and iconic status. Their barbaric acts and their ability to control a nation through propaganda have always influenced historian's interest in them. It wasn't until the late 20th century that historians really began delving into the amazing amount of evidence which has now become available to link the two together. The reason historical comparison only emerged some 40 years after their height of power is because evidence on the two was previously lopsided. There has always been an abundance of information on Hitler and the Third Reich but very little was known about Stalin until the collapse of the Soviet Union. After this it became clear the true extent of the crime which was committed under Stalin. ...read more.

Middle

in 1933 Hitler was made Chancellor and after Hindenberg death he declared himself Fuhrer of Germany resulting in the failure of Blomberg to control him. Stalin's rise to power was somewhat different to Hitler's. He had a small role in the 1917 Russian Revolution. After the revolution he was given many diminutive duties within the Bolshevik party. He was seen as dull and unimportant within the party, and was perceived as being unintelligent, although this wasn't the case. Stalin was grossly underestimated and after becoming the General Secretary he was fighting for the place of leader against Trotsky. The coming months prior to Lenin's death in 1924, Lenin was becoming more concerned about Stalin's character and wrote a number of letters asking for Trotsky's help. Unfortunately Lenin died before any action was taken and Stalin became leader. The comparisons which historians have made about their rise to power is how they were both underestimated, how they came to power almost by accident or pure luck and how both leaders, Lenin and Hindenberg feared them coming to power. Once in power their ambition for complete control was evident. They became so powerful within the party that it was difficult to separate the man from the political system. Both parties were headed by one man and one party who had absolute control over the nation. Politically there are differences between the two, the structure of the party and their organisational and leadership skills differed. Hitler was renowned for being lazy and unorganised and he spent most of the day in bed, Hitler was a "non interventionist dictator as far as government administration was concerned."12 He hated paperwork and was completely non bureaucratic, "It became more and more difficult for Lammers and Meibner to get him to make decisions which he alone could make as head of state... he disliked the study of documents...he took the view that many things sorted themselves out on their own if one did not interfere."13Stalin on the other hand relied on regulation and needed the political system to be organised. ...read more.

Conclusion

1 M Bennett, Nazism and Stalinism, (History Review, issue 45, march 2003) 2 D Welch, The Third Reich, Politics and Propaganda, (Routledge, London 1993) p 3 3 I Kershaw, The Nazi Dictatorship, 3rd Ed. (Edward Arnold, London 1993) p 20 4 I Kershaw & M Lewin (edited by) Stalinism and Nazism, Dictatorships in Comparisons (Cambridge University Press, 1997) p 3 5 http://www.angelfire.com/biz/telospress/images/benoist112.pdf 6 Ibid 7 E Nolte, Martin Heidegger Politik und Geschichte im Leben un Denken (The American Historical Review vol 98 no 4 1993) pp 1277-1278 8 T. S Hamerow, Reviewed work, Hitler and Stalin Parallel lives, by Allan Bullock, (The Journal of Modern History, Vol 67, No 1 March 1995) p124 9 Ibid 10 A Bullock, Hitler and Stalin, Parallel Lives, (Harpers Collins 1991) p349 11 E Wiskemann, Europe of the Dictators, 1919-1945 (The Phillips Park Press, Manchester 1966) p 97 12 I Kershaw & M Lewin (edited by) Stalinism and Nazism, Dictatorships in Comparisons (Cambridge University Press, 1997) p 92 13 J Noakes & G Pridham, Nazism 1919-1945, Volume Two: State, Economy and Society, 1933-39 - A Documentary Reader, (University of Exeter Press, 1984 ) pp 207-208 14I Kershaw & M Lewin (edited by) Stalinism and Nazism, Dictatorships in Comparisons (Cambridge University Press, 1997) p 91 15 V Barnett, Nazism and Stalinism (History Review, Issue 49, September 2004) p51 16 http://www.kdhs.org.uk/history/v2/a/as_unit6/kersh1.htm 17I Kershaw & M Lewin (edited by) Stalinism and Nazism, Dictatorships in Comparisons (Cambridge University Press, 1997) p 90 18 Ibid p 93 19 Ibid p 9 20 M Bennett, Nazism and Stalinism, (History Review, issue 45, march 2003) p 8 21 http://www.jpfo.org/wolfe-blackbook.htm 22 M Bennett, Nazism and Stalinism, (History Review, issue 45, march 2003) 23 Ibid 24 R Pearce, Review of The Dictators: Hitler's Germany and Stalin's Russia, (History Today, vol. 54, issue 11, November 2004) p79 25 Ibid 26 Ibid 27 Ibid 28 M Bennett, Nazism and Stalinism, (History Review, issue 45, march 2003) 29 http://www.jpfo.org/wolfe-blackbook.htm ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To What Extent was fear of the Gestapo and the SS the main reason ...

    4 star(s)

    The Nazis Plans for peasants and small farmers were that they wrote off debts for them and made the Reich Food Estate and the Reich Entailed Law which gave security to farmers and supervised agricultural production and wages for the farmers.

  2. To what extent can Hitler be considered to be "weak"?

    He obviously made a great name for himself and fame, meaning that he could get people to do his work. Yet, at the same time, he was very interested in natural selection and therefore encouraged competition in his Third Reich to produce generals that are of high standards.

  1. Hitler and the Nazi Regime - revision sheet.

    Nov 9/10 (Kristallnacht) 8,000 Jewish business were destroyed, 200 synagogues burned, hundreds of Jews beaten and over 90 killed, 30,000 send to concentration camps - released after agreeing to leave Germany Creation of a People's Community Nazis claimed to be creating a new kind of society - people's community in which the class divisions would cease.

  2. Why did Hindenburg appoint Hitler as Chancellor in 1933?

    He underlined what he believed the people would want from their government, within the twenty-five points there was something for everyone. 'He speaks for me, he speaks for me, God be thanked, He understands' (a Nazi supporter in the crowd as Hitler spoke, 1943).

  1. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    Everything had to show the building of a new and better society. 4. Plots had to have a happy ending. 5. Paintings of villages showed an abundance of corn and content peasants, when in reality there was class warfare and famine. 6. Music had to be optimistic and jolly.

  2. "The Wannsee Conference was entirely responsible for the Holocaust" How valid is this assessment ...

    This caused much confusion within the Nazi party and inner conflict between the main leadership of the Nazi party which often meant they were constantly in a power struggle with different departments, each despised the other, mostly competing for Hitler's attention and acknowledgement, each time becoming more ruthless and radical

  1. Why was Stalin able to establish his dictatorship in Russia?

    Fourteen men were executed, and further rivals were imprisoned on charges pertaining to his death, giving the undeniable impression that he was completely in charge. It is through this political opportunism that Stalin was able to cement his dictatorship, taking every opportunity to assert himself and meaning that he surpassed any serious opposition within a few years of Lenin?s death.

  2. Free essay

    Propaganda was a critically important tool used to the control the masses in Nazi ...

    These schemes were widely publicised through propaganda, especially the cheap radio that was manufactured and distributed to the populace20. The radios had foreign stations blocked, so no outside ideas could leak in. During this early part of the war, propagandists were able to manipulate the many victories and had the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work