• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evaluate the impact of two-single part states on world affairs.

Extracts from this document...


Evaluate the impact of two-single part states on world affairs The emergence of Cuba as a single party Communist state and Castro as its 'maximum leader' had a dramatic impact on Cold War relations. So much so that it tipped the US-Soviet scale on par with each other. Similarly, Hitler as an absolute leader of Germany had significant impact on world affairs to the extent that some historians would argue that it triggered the outbreak of the Second World War. Despite being in different eras, they certainly have similarities but mostly differences primarily due to their ideology, one being Communist/Socialist whilst the other being Fascist. 'The real Cold War evolution did not have it's beginnings in the working relationship which was established between Havana and Moscow, but rather in the deteriorating relationships between the Cuban capital and Washington' (TonyHowarth, 1979). After the Cuban Revolution Castro rose to become the leader of Cuba and under his leadership he made attempts to establish diplomatic relations with the United States but was humiliated. ...read more.


According to the historian Thomas Patterson, 'the United States' sanctions against Fidel Castro and his government provided the rationale and the catalytic action which accelerated close economic, political and military relations between Cuba and the USSR'. The improved Cuban-Russian relations meant that Khrushchev was able to place nuclear weapons in Cuba to safeguard both Cuba to prevent it from future invasions and Russian interests. The Cuban Missile Crisis has created a shift in the Cold War balance of power because previously, only the Americans had missiles targeted on the USSR in Turkey, but now Russia also had its nuclear weapons targeted at the United States. This was significant as it gave Khrushchev greater leverage in negotiations concerning Berlin but also the situation of stalemate or 'brinkmanship'. The crisis has shaped the world we live in today as it brought the world close when both leaders agree to establish diplomatic relations and talks as well as measures to prevent such crisis reoccurring in the future. Furthermore, the crisis made the people in the world to realize how close the world came towards a nuclear war and that they should work towards disarming. ...read more.


In contrast, Germany was in a much better position with regards to its control over its foreign policy largely due to its strong industrialized economy and Hitler being an aggressive expansionist dictator. Without doubt, Germany had a large impact on world affairs as Hitler's policy of lebensraum was partly responsible for the outbreak of the Second World War and dictated world politics several years to come. Therefore, it is evident to say that Hitler and Castro followed different foreign policies due to their differing views in ideology and because of the political, economical and social situation they were faced with. Perhaps Castro would have adopted a different foreign policy if its economy were stronger and was placed differently geographically. Regardless, we can say that both the single party states had an immense impact on world affairs to the extent that there are some remnants of it left, such as the creation of the United Nations after Second World War. ?? ?? ?? ?? TAVEEPHOL CHARDTUMRONG 13K ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. To what extent was Hitler solely responsible for the Holocaust

    13Goldhagen believes the 'long existing' and 'virulent' anti-Semitism in Germany meant that many ordinary Germans wanted to eliminate the Jews from society. Although a controversial statement, there may be some truth to what Goldhagen has said, for many perfectly ordinary Germans from all walks of life did have a significant role to play in the holocaust.

  2. The Cuban Missile Crisis and the blockade

    would be in chaos, and a civil war could break out if nothing was done. A full-scale invasion meant around a quarter of a million troops would need to be sent in, along with the navy and the air force.

  1. The Bay of Pigs Invasion

    Hence, if Kennedy had called off the invasion, he would have distorted his image as a strong, influential president. He probably would have been blamed for Castro's continued existence in Cuba. Because of multiple security leaks in this huge operation, the world already knew about the preparations, and the Government and CIA's embarrassment would have been public.

  2. Superpower Relations 1945-90

    * On 4 November Khrushchev ordered the Soviet army to invade Hungary and crush the uprising. There was bitter street fighting; 7,000 Soviet troops and 30,000 Hungarians were killed. * Nagy was arrested and later hanged. The Hungarians called on the West for help.

  1. Khrushchev's attempts at modernisation.

    Perhaps this was the lasting achievement of Glasnost and Perestroika? 1998: Why did the Soviet Union collapse in 1991? (11) 1999: Explain why the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991 (8) 2000: Why did Gorbachev resign as leader of the USSR in 1991?

  2. The Cuban Missile Crisis

    Suspicion of the Soviets escalated to a new high, as many key officials sided with former Secretary of State John Dulles in describing the period of peace as "a tactical ploy to lure the West into a false sense of security, while (they)

  1. There were two periods in which the United States pursued policies of non-intervention in ...

    The evidence of self-interest is clear when the historical context is examined. In 1818, there were revolutionary governments in Venezuela, Argentina and Chile and the United States was asked to grant recognition to these governments. To do so, however, would have upset the negotiations going on between the United States and Spain (the colonisers of these countries)

  2. Many peoples have contributed to the development of the United States of America, a ...

    During the presidency of Andrew JACKSON (1829-37), a sharp bipolarization occurred again in the nation's politics. Of Scots-Irish descent, Jackson hated the English, and he was, in turn, as thoroughly disliked by New Englanders, who thought him violent and barbaric.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work