Nicole Katalbas        

Eng 102

Delgado

5 Nov 2007

Embracing One’s Heritage: Either All or Nothing

        During the Black Power movement, African Americans joined the cause and many of them learned a superficial perspective of their heritage. Alice Walker explains to her audience that one cannot just follow and never question his/her own actions. Many did this during the Black Power movement abandoning the American heritage. In “Everyday Use,” written right after the Civil Rights Movement, Mama and Maggie live in the South living their lives like the generations before them. Dee’s disregard for her adopted African heritage corresponds with her ignorance of her American heritage. Walker challenges only those who do not accept and appropriately respect the many African-Americans who lived hardships in their efforts to survive such a harsh setting. Being an African-American is equally African and American and taking a side is offensive to one’s family and destructive to one’s self.

        Mama lives her everyday life like those in her family before her, keeping her heritage alive. She, the narrator, is the mother of Dee and Maggie, two completely different young women. Mama describes herself as a “large, big-boned woman with rough, man-working hands” (Walker 141). Mama’s description tells the reader she is a hard worker much like her ancestors. She takes pride in her work. “A yard like this is more comfortable than most people know… it is like an extended living room” (140). One can imply that Mama enjoys the simple things in life like nature and has more time to think freely about her life and her family.

The visit of the narrator’s daughter Dee gives the audience insight into the kind of knowledge she has attained in the “real world.” The audience can conclude that Dee’s knowledge of her heritage is superficial. When her mother addresses her as Dee, her daughter corrects her and informs her of her new name. “Not ‘Dee,’ Wangero Leewanika Kemanjo!”… “She’s dead,” Wangero said, “I couldn’t bear it any longer, being named after the people who oppress me” (144). Dee’s change to a more ‘African name’ was common during the Black Power movement. Dee’s claim that she being named after “people who oppress me” is partially correct since she her name comes from her great-grandmother whose name at one time had been changed by slave owners. Nevertheless, her great-grandmother faced hardships in this country and survived strengthening her family. Dee’s claim is shallow only to think that the name came from a white oppressor, but in actuality, her great-grandmother, Dee, sacrificed a lot for her family. Changing her name to an ‘African one’ is disrespectful because it signifies nothing to her family. Dee’s lack of knowledge regarding her family is symbolic of the Black Power movement’s ignorance for its American heritage.

Join now!

        Furthermore, Dee’s new name is not even correctly spelled which adds to her trivial attitude toward her newly adopted African culture. White informs readers of validity of her name, “Wangero and Kemanjo are misspellings of the Kikiyu names ‘Wanjero’ and ‘Kemenjo.’” Also, ‘Leewanika is correct but not Kikiyu, but of another African tribe (White 3). Dee’s inconsistencies only add to her frivolous sophistication and her inability to check her sources.

        In addition, Dee’s (Wangero’s) motives for her family’s possessions only add to her superficial nature and lack of understanding of her family. At dinner, Dee asks/takes the churn top ...

This is a preview of the whole essay