• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Examine the view that the title the great Reform act given to the Act of 1832, is a flattering description of an important but overestimated piece of legislation.

Extracts from this document...


The Great Reform Act of 1832 Examine the view that the title the great Reform act given to the Act of 1832, is a flattering description of an important but overestimated piece of legislation. It was towards the middle end of the 18th Century that pressure for reforming the British political system grew. Those opposed to the current system of the time fell into two categories. Firstly, there were those who were from the Propertied Classes who had access to influential friends (be it in our out of government) and envisaged a slightly altered government in which control still lay in the hands of men with property and education. Secondly, there were those without much property and a much smaller income. These lower/middle class people believed that voting and choosing the nations rulers, i.e. the government, was a fundamental right and that the amount of property or money you owned should have no relation to your voting rights. Together, these two groups of people formed the parliamentary reform movement which significantly grew towards the end of the 18th century and then into the start of the 19th century up until the first reform in 1832. The growth of this movement can be targeted to 3 main reasons. The first was unrest at how influence or patronage determined matters at Westminster. ...read more.


In April 1831, Grey asked permission from William IV to dissolve Parliament so that the Whigs could secure a larger majority and in turn, pass through the reforms they wanted. William agreed to the proposal which set the ball rolling for the reforms. It was after Lord Grey's election victory that he tried again for parliamentary reform. However, on the 22nd September 1831, it was the Tories who dominated the House of Lords and after a long session of scrutinizing the bill in the Lords, it was scrapped. This led to outrage amongst the Whigs and many riots occurred throughout cities in Britain showing just how much the reform bill was approved. Grey did not give up, instead he pressed on with the help of Henry Brougham, a Whig-peer and the two men met with William IV and requested permission to create a large number of Whig-peers so a majority could be met. This failed however and Grey and his government stepped down as a result. William then asked the Duke of Wellington to form a new Tory Government to fill the power vacuum left by the Whigs. The Tories refused which led to William IV having no choice but to agree to create more Whig-peers which in turn, passed the bill. ...read more.


It gave the rights of property a new lease of life, under existing management and it secured political stability in the 1830s and 1840s. These revolutions in Europe depended on the extent of middle class leadership and as the middle class in Britain had been hitched to the higher echelons of political leadership, Britain was essentially safe. Were power to have solely stayed in the hands of aristocrats, Britain would have surely seen a revolution so the reform act did serve one very positive purpose. But perhaps the Great Reform Act was indeed great. Robert Peel, a Conservative at the time feared the bill would lead to more dramatic changes and he was right. It was impossible that the Reform of 1832 would be the 'final solution of a great constitutional question'. The act was seen as a 'stepping stone' for other reforms which finally awarded the working class with the vote and in effect, allowed the social classes to co-operate and collaborate. And that is what the act prevented, the 'crude supersession of one ruling class by another', surely a good thing. Despites its imperfections, its flaws and its lack of rights for the lower class, the Great Reform Act of 1832 set Britain on the right path to non-violent change, a precedent surely more appealing than a violent revolution. Therefore, the reform should certainly be valued as a positive start for constitutional change in the 1800's. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Why was the reform act of 1832 passed?

    Reform had been wanted by some individuals for many years however and so it wasn't such a sudden demand. Jeremy Bentham and his supporters had been calling for reform since 1817, where they called for general elections and votes for all men over 21.

  2. Does Alexander II deserve the title of 'Tsar liberator'?

    in modern history?[6], an opinion which is perhaps deduced from a number of small successes of the reform. The decline of the gentry continued and the Mir and its powers were strengthened, both of which were eminently popular and positive effects for the peasants, who had more independence on a local scale.

  1. Assess the validity of the view that the Rump and Barebones parliaments had no ...

    The moderates and conservatives within Parliament grew exasperated with such radicalism and concluded that the only way to check the radicals was to dissolve the assembly. Accordingly, in December, the moderates met in a special session, from which the radicals were excluded and voted to terminate their proceedings.

  2. To what extent was the 1832 reform act the result of popular pressure

    The death of George IV, also had important political repercussions and was one of the factors contributing to parliamentary reform. His death marked the end of the reign of a man passionately devoted to the Tories and a staunch opponent of electoral reform.

  1. Interpreting the 1832 Reform Act, its origins and effects, has generated continuing debate among ...

    Phillips identifies an increase in voting on national party lines, but he also states that reform had uneven results. Perhaps in his general conclusions he loses sight of this point. His sample of boroughs all survived 1832 as two-member constituencies, moreover, which makes them a questionable basis for generalisation.

  2. To What Extent Was The 1832 Reform Act A Turning Point?

    The reform act increased the possibility of a two party system. Both the Whigs and the Tories now had to organise themselves in a national basis and be acutely aware of public opinion by way of local party managers. General elections began to be the means by which governments were

  1. To what extent does the Reform Act of 1832 deserved to be called Great?

    Another reason why the reform holds its title is that it granted some of the middle class the chance to vote for the very first time. Before the act was passed in May 1832 the middle class didn?t have the vote at all, also, it was geographically unbalanced and the country was spread unevenly.

  2. How great was the Great Reform Act?

    actually lost their right to vote due to the abolition of such aspects. Open voting was also a very ?corrupt part? of the voting system that the act had failed to abolish, and so open voting allowed land owners and aristocrats to bully, bribe, violently persuade and intimidate people into voting for them.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work