• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain how Ferdinand and Isabella dealt with the problems facing them before 1479.

Extracts from this document...


HISTORY AS-LEVEL 2003 European History Essay Paper - Past Question Plans. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Explain how Ferdinand and Isabella dealt with the problems facing them before 1479. This is an 'explain' type question - so it's asking you to do just that, but also a little more. Merely describing the measures Ferdinand and Isabella took to cope with various problems will get some marks, but more marks will be gained if you weigh up the outcomes of these policies, and register how successful they were. For example, you may say in the essay that Ferdinand and Isabella faced economic problems, and you may go on to explain what policy(ies) they introduced to solve the problem. This would be 'explaining' how they 'dealt' with the problem, but you can go further and say how well they dealt with it compared to other issues, etc. Also, refer to historians and what they said about how they dealt with problems. Always link back to the question. So - you must: a) Show what the problems were b) What measures they took to deal with them c) How successful these measures were, evaluating against other issues, historiographical interpretations, short-term/long-term instances. The essay: PARA 1 - WHAT WERE THE PROBLEMS: i) Civil War in Aragon - decline of Barcelona, civil disorder, social unrest. ii) Lack of Grandee support for Isabella. iii) Lack of Town support for Isabella. ...read more.


Clearly you understand that religion was important and since this is the factor given in the essay title, you need to deal with this in the greatest depth. A brief introduction stressing the piety of Ferdinand and (especially) Isabella (eg ref "the Catholic monarchs", the fact that their tomb in Granada Cathedral records only their "achievements" in religion) should be an followed by an explanation of how the conquest of Granada, the establishment of religious uniformity, the reform of the Spanish Church and even the sponsorship of Columbus were motivated by religious aims. In the context of this essay, the policy of religious uniformity requires particular attention, as the implementation of this policy was politically difficult (eg opposition to the Inquisition, especially in the Aragonese kingdoms and the revolt of the Alpujarras) and economically damaging (eg the loss of the wealth and commercial skills of the Jewish community especially in Barcelona and the disruption to trade and agriculture in Granada after the expulsion of the Moors). It therefore shows the importance of religion in the formation and implementation of policy, given that Ferdinand & Isabella were willing to accept the consequent political and economic difficulties. However, to give your essay balance you will need also to explain that these "religious" policies had other aims too, given the pressing need to restore and strengthen royal authority (particularly in Castile, after the anarchy of Henry IV's reign and the civil war). ...read more.


Finally, explain that Ferdinand & Isabella certainly didn't unite Spain in any political sense. Indeed, they probably had no intention of ever doing so (for example they never called themselves the King and Queen of Spain!). The component kingdoms all had their own rights and privileges that made it almost impossible to rule as a single political unit . Indeed, given the potential strength of the crown in Castile (and the weakness of royal authority in Aragon) Ferdinand & Isabella wisely concentrated on restoring the authority of the crown there, leaving Aragon more or less to its own devices. Apart from the Inquisition, there were no common political, administrative, legal or military institutions and the rights of the Aragonese kingdoms, Navarre and the Basque Provinces were fully respected (apart from the imposition of the Inquisition). Conclude this section of your essay by referring to events after Isabella's death, when Ferdinand was seen as a "foreign" ruler with no rights in Castile and was consequently excluded from the government of the country. It was only the death of Archduke Philip and the madness of Joanna that forced the Castilian administration under Cisneros to turn (very reluctantly!) to Ferdinand for assistance. As noted above, your conclusion might include discussion of other interpretations/points of view but it is better if you end up reinforcing your own argument! If you can, find a snappy quotation that supports your point of view to end with! I hope this hopes you with your studies. Good luck! ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

5 star(s)

There is a great deal of relevant and well explained information about the rule of Ferdinand and Isabella here. The majority of advice about how to structure responses is very useful. 5 out of 5 stars.

Marked by teacher Natalya Luck 16/07/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    ' Did Alexander II deserve the title Tsar Liberator

    5 star(s)

    This showed that the Czar was remained autocratic. The relaxation of Russian rule in Poland led to patriotic street demonstrations, attempted assassinations. Even more serious, from the Czar's point of view, was the spread of nihilistic doctrines among Russian youth, producing radical leaflets, secret societies, and the beginnings of a revolutionary movement.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    How serious a threat did the Puritans pose to Elizabeth I and her Church?

    4 star(s)

    Lockyer explains how 'this was a clear invasion of the Queen's prerogative...but they were up against men who would let nothing stand in the way of religious truth' and argues that it showed 'how the puritans were shifting their attack from matters of detail - adiaphora- to the central question

  1. Describe how Cavour, Garibaldi, Mazzini and Victor Emmanuel II helped to bring about the ...

    He wished to see a unified Italy. He was so great that he refused all honours but retired to the island of Caprera. Even he retired, he still fought for his country for liberalism. Because of his great contribution in the Italian Unification, he was regarded as the 'sword' of Italian unification since he unified southern Italy by military force.

  2. What problems did Elizabeth I face at the begining of her reign?

    Elizabeth began her reign by facing a difficult religious decision; what official religion should the country have? Her largest problem in making this choice was that she was a Protestant whereas England had previously been Catholic under Mary's control. She could either follow her brother Edward's example of Protestantism or continue with Mary's Catholic rule.

  1. Was Charles I responsible for his execution?

    to Charles' father King James who had had a terribly unsettling relationship with parliament. He, as his son was soon to be, was a firm believer in the divine right of Kings, but it could be argued that he had more political tact than Charles would have, but he still expected Parliament to obey and agree with his every decision.

  2. How successfully did James deal with religious problems throughout his reign?

    This incident was derived from hopes for a more tolerant policy form James. In 1604 James ended England's war with Spain and signed a treaty in aid of his pacific inclination. Catholic hopes were diminished by this, as the majority of the English gentry dissented from Spanish succession, and without

  1. What Was The Main Cause Of The First English Civil War?

    mandatory condition noting that it must be called once every three years. Shortly after, the King was backed into more concessions, including the illegalization of ship money and the abolishment of the Courts of Star Chamber and Court of High Commission, two feared arbitrary courts in which Archbishop William Laud

  2. With what success did Wolsey pursue his aims in foreign policy?

    Although the French pension of �20,000 was reinstated, it nowhere near covered Henry's debts. Also, Henry's divorce was no more likely than before. In fact, it can safely be concluded that in his aim for increased prestige in Europe, Wolsey's foreign policy was a failure - by 1529, England was

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work