• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain how Ferdinand and Isabella dealt with the problems facing them before 1479.

Extracts from this document...


HISTORY AS-LEVEL 2003 European History Essay Paper - Past Question Plans. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Explain how Ferdinand and Isabella dealt with the problems facing them before 1479. This is an 'explain' type question - so it's asking you to do just that, but also a little more. Merely describing the measures Ferdinand and Isabella took to cope with various problems will get some marks, but more marks will be gained if you weigh up the outcomes of these policies, and register how successful they were. For example, you may say in the essay that Ferdinand and Isabella faced economic problems, and you may go on to explain what policy(ies) they introduced to solve the problem. This would be 'explaining' how they 'dealt' with the problem, but you can go further and say how well they dealt with it compared to other issues, etc. Also, refer to historians and what they said about how they dealt with problems. Always link back to the question. So - you must: a) Show what the problems were b) What measures they took to deal with them c) How successful these measures were, evaluating against other issues, historiographical interpretations, short-term/long-term instances. The essay: PARA 1 - WHAT WERE THE PROBLEMS: i) Civil War in Aragon - decline of Barcelona, civil disorder, social unrest. ii) Lack of Grandee support for Isabella. iii) Lack of Town support for Isabella. ...read more.


Clearly you understand that religion was important and since this is the factor given in the essay title, you need to deal with this in the greatest depth. A brief introduction stressing the piety of Ferdinand and (especially) Isabella (eg ref "the Catholic monarchs", the fact that their tomb in Granada Cathedral records only their "achievements" in religion) should be an followed by an explanation of how the conquest of Granada, the establishment of religious uniformity, the reform of the Spanish Church and even the sponsorship of Columbus were motivated by religious aims. In the context of this essay, the policy of religious uniformity requires particular attention, as the implementation of this policy was politically difficult (eg opposition to the Inquisition, especially in the Aragonese kingdoms and the revolt of the Alpujarras) and economically damaging (eg the loss of the wealth and commercial skills of the Jewish community especially in Barcelona and the disruption to trade and agriculture in Granada after the expulsion of the Moors). It therefore shows the importance of religion in the formation and implementation of policy, given that Ferdinand & Isabella were willing to accept the consequent political and economic difficulties. However, to give your essay balance you will need also to explain that these "religious" policies had other aims too, given the pressing need to restore and strengthen royal authority (particularly in Castile, after the anarchy of Henry IV's reign and the civil war). ...read more.


Finally, explain that Ferdinand & Isabella certainly didn't unite Spain in any political sense. Indeed, they probably had no intention of ever doing so (for example they never called themselves the King and Queen of Spain!). The component kingdoms all had their own rights and privileges that made it almost impossible to rule as a single political unit . Indeed, given the potential strength of the crown in Castile (and the weakness of royal authority in Aragon) Ferdinand & Isabella wisely concentrated on restoring the authority of the crown there, leaving Aragon more or less to its own devices. Apart from the Inquisition, there were no common political, administrative, legal or military institutions and the rights of the Aragonese kingdoms, Navarre and the Basque Provinces were fully respected (apart from the imposition of the Inquisition). Conclude this section of your essay by referring to events after Isabella's death, when Ferdinand was seen as a "foreign" ruler with no rights in Castile and was consequently excluded from the government of the country. It was only the death of Archduke Philip and the madness of Joanna that forced the Castilian administration under Cisneros to turn (very reluctantly!) to Ferdinand for assistance. As noted above, your conclusion might include discussion of other interpretations/points of view but it is better if you end up reinforcing your own argument! If you can, find a snappy quotation that supports your point of view to end with! I hope this hopes you with your studies. Good luck! ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

5 star(s)

There is a great deal of relevant and well explained information about the rule of Ferdinand and Isabella here. The majority of advice about how to structure responses is very useful. 5 out of 5 stars.

Marked by teacher Natalya Luck 16/07/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    ' Did Alexander II deserve the title Tsar Liberator

    5 star(s)

    Therefore, the emancipation was not as 'liberal' as it shown. Moreover, from the setting up of Zemstva, since if the serfs were freed, there would be a vacuum in local affairs previously filled by the serfs. It would be essential to create some type of local council which would continue

  2. Marked by a teacher

    How serious a threat did the Puritans pose to Elizabeth I and her Church?

    4 star(s)

    Neale argues that this was also a large threat to Elizabeth, and 'the secret, coordinated activity of the classes had gone far enough to create an illusion of spontaneous widespread, discontent' However the 1584 Parliament was not the Puritan triumph that Field had hoped, showing his lack of influence.

  1. Describe how Cavour, Garibaldi, Mazzini and Victor Emmanuel II helped to bring about the ...

    He wished to see a unified Italy. He was so great that he refused all honours but retired to the island of Caprera. Even he retired, he still fought for his country for liberalism. Because of his great contribution in the Italian Unification, he was regarded as the 'sword' of Italian unification since he unified southern Italy by military force.

  2. What were the aims of English Foreign Policy 1529-1558?

    The fact that Henry divorced Anne of Cleves as quickly as he could shows that the marriage alliance was not really a success. The wars with Scotland and France can also be classed as a failure.

  1. Was Charles I responsible for his execution?

    to Charles' father King James who had had a terribly unsettling relationship with parliament. He, as his son was soon to be, was a firm believer in the divine right of Kings, but it could be argued that he had more political tact than Charles would have, but he still expected Parliament to obey and agree with his every decision.

  2. Why did Labour win the 1945 election and lose in the 1951 election?

    Labour gave independence to India, Pakistan, Ceylon and Burma, and pulled out of Palestine. Labour argued that they had earned their independence by fighting in WW2, and that it was not economically viable to sustain them. However, the electorate did not empathise with this view, many now believing that the Conservatives were a more trustworthy option.

  1. How successfully did James deal with religious problems throughout his reign?

    in retaliation against the oppressive anti-catholic laws being applied by James I. The Roman Catholics were dissilusioned by James' failure to deliver toleration and with the treaty with Spain in 1604 were now deprived of the hope of any outside assistance.

  2. What Was The Main Cause Of The First English Civil War?

    The King long delayed releasing a reply until Parliament threatened to publically release the document, forcing a quick response. In spite of seemingly moderate negotiations, rumours began to circulate that Parliament had intentions of impeaching Queen Henrietta Maria. Charles was fiercely defensive of his Catholic wife and as a result

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work