• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain how other factors helped Stalin in his Rise to Power.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

AS History Explain how other factors helped Stalin in his Rise to Power Following the death of Lenin in 1922, it was simply a matter of time before one member of the Politburo, who announced they would be acting as a collective leadership, gained individual power. The successful individual was Stalin, who hailing from humble beginnings, rose up through the ranks to become the brutal and ruthless dictator of the Soviet State. Stalin managed to do this not simply because of his personal strengths or brilliances, neither was it purely down to luck. It was due to a combination of factors, some concerning Stalin's actions and his opportunist ways, some to do with his opponents such as Trotsky and their fundamental weaknesses, and other factors which were simply out of Stalin's control. Stalin's background and personality played a large role in Stalin's rise to power. He was from the tough, fierce region of Georgia, which made him a strong character, but also gained him the post of Commissar for Nationalities, which was the first step in his rise to power within the party. He trained as a priest at a seminary which showed another side to Stalin's character as he was not a religious man, so this fine-tuned his ability to lie convincingly. ...read more.

Middle

The only member who received praise was Trotsky, yet he agreed, along with the others, to keep the Testament secret. This helped Stalin greatly because if the public became aware of Lenin's worries, then he surely would have been stopped, but along with Trotsky's absence from the funeral, a critical mistake on Trotsky's behalf, for whatever reasons, which questioned his respect for Lenin's death, allowed Stalin to gain the upper hand. He was able to act as orator and lead mourner at the funeral, confirming his appearance to the public as Lenin's heir. This was an important move politically as it gave Stalin an immediate advantage over the other members of the Politburo, who from now on would find it very difficult to form any opposition to Stalin, but just as important, it displayed Stalin as continuing the 'mantle of Lenin' to the people of the USSR.. They had seen Lenin as almost a god, and so anyone seen to be continuing his work would be accepted and worshipped in the same way. This would not have been possible without the suppression of the testament, and Trotsky's presence at the funeral would have made it more difficult for Stalin to appear as Lenin's successor. ...read more.

Conclusion

His post of General Secretary at the time of Lenin's death allowed him to take control of the party behind the scenes, and because of the system of government he was able to do this to without being suspected, along with the suppression of Lenin's testament, which was crucial in his rise to power. All the factors were vital in Stalin's rise to power, but without them all coming together at the right time, his rise may still have been possible, but would have been made a lot more difficult. What is important is that Stain was a very lucky man. He was an opportunist who did things at the right time, but this alone could not have been enough to secure Stalin's position as leader of the party. I think the most important factor in Stalin's rise to power was Trotsky's weaknesses and mistakes, which played right into Stalin's hands. Trotsky missed the chance to remove Stalin from power completely by failing to speak up against the suppression of Lenin's testament. Because of Trotsky's reluctance to stand up to him, after this event, Stalin's rise to power as the dictator of the USSR was firmly in place. Now all that was needed was a bit of manipulation here and there to gain complete and absolute control. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Why did Stalin Rise to Power?

    The testament did call Trotsky arrogant, but it spoke less ill of him than the other candidates, however, due to his dislike of political infighting, he chose not to argue against the burial, proving to be a fatal mistake.

  2. Mussolini(TM)s rise to power up to 1922 owes more to the failures of others ...

    Socialism Anti- Socialism was a winning policy not only for the landowners but also the Hierarchy of the Catholic Church, the middle class and the Industrialists. Mussolini skilfully traded on the fear of socialism in Italy; many preferred the idea of Fascism to the apparent imminent danger of a left wing revolution.

  1. How and why did Stalin rise to power?

    When Lenin died, he left Stalin in a good position to rise to power. He had already obtained great power working as the Party General Secretary, and by taking on the jobs that no other members of the Politburo wanted.

  2. How Did Stalin Rise To Power?

    He thought that Trotsky and Stalin were to blame for this. He also wrote about them in his testament: 'Comrade Stalin, having become secretary of (of the communist party) has unlimited authority concentrated in his hands, and I am not sure whether he will always be capable of using that authority with sufficient caution.

  1. Can Napoleon's rise to power merely be attributed to his control of the government?'

    leader if they seized the opportunity and that is exactly what Napoleon did. This is one of the first clear factors which show that Napoleon's rise to power cannot merely be attributed to his control of the army. It was during the Revolution that Napoleon transformed himself into a Jacobin

  2. History - Mussolini's Rise to Power

    By this, combined with the above knowledge of their intrinsic insufficiency, it could be said that the left were not credible opponents to the Fascists despite having a strong numerical base. The liberal democracy established in 1870 was another potential form of opposition to the Fascists in the period prior to 1922.

  1. How did Stalin Rise to Power between 1922 – 1929?

    Unlike Lenin, he could not impose his authority naturally on his peers. He was no intellectual; Trotsky, Bukharin, and many others were superior to him in this respect."7 The leadership struggle of the 1920s When Lenin fell ill in 1922 the leading Bolsheviks in Soviet Russia - the members of

  2. Stalins Rise to Power

    He was also absent for crucial votes in the Politburo. * Gregory Zinoviev He had been active in the party since 1903. He opposed the armed uprising in October and fell out with Lenin about the construction of the new government as he favoured socialist coalition.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work