• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain how the Schleiffen Plan was meant to work

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

GCSE History Coursework. Explain how the Schleiffen Plan was meant to work. The Schleiffen Plan was made between 1871 and 1905 by General count von Schleiffen. The main aim of the Schleiffen plan was to avoid a war on two fronts; they decided that they wanted to knock France out of any war with one lightening attack. In the time between the General's retirement and the actual event, the plan was worked on and amended by many people. The majority of the plan was based on assumptions that the Russian army would take quite a while to mobilise; in this time the Germans would attack the French, at Paris. The idea was that the greatly strengthened right wing of the German army in the northern Rhineland would carry out a wide skirting movement through neutral Belgium and Holland before moving south to encircle the French near Paris. The army would create a sweeping arc of 400miles just to the west of Paris. Belgium and Holland seemed like a good route because they expected very little if any resistance, and they were sure that any Belgian army would have any effect on the German progress. They were also working under the assumption that Britain would not uphold its ancient pact with Belgium and would therefore not get involved. ...read more.

Middle

Stalemate was developed because warfare went from a war of movement to a war of attrition. Although there were some advances with the trenches, progress was slow and often there was not enough support for a side, therefore they often had to retreat, once again developing the stalemate. Calvary was vulnerable in trench warfare, therefore waves of attacking infantry took over as new weapons such as gas attacks, tanks and poison were brought into existence. Despite such high losses, neither side were prepared to compromise and make peace, so little ground was gained. New tactics were used over and over again, no one seemed to learn from previous mistakes. Although the new tactics and artillery were put into place they were still not sophisticated enough to break the stalemate on the western front. The following were equally important reasons why the stalemate on the Western Front was finally broken: new technology like the tank, the American entry into the war, the blockading of German ports, the German offensive in Mach 1918. Explain how far you agree with this statement. There are a number of reasons why stalemate on the Western Front was broken; they are all equally important factors. Some factors include the naval blockade on German Ports, the American entry into the war in April 1917, the Ludendorff offensive in March 1918 and the continuous improvements to technology throughout the war. ...read more.

Conclusion

New technology resulted in all sides changing their tactics accordingly. The submarines at sea became highly effective in the naval war as the torpedo was introduced. Even the greatest of battle ships became vulnerable to the powerful torpedos. Cambrai is a good example of the effective use of tanks in the war. Over 350 tanks were used to good effect, although a loss was sometimes found, as they were unable to hold the ground they had gained from the opposition. Mines were introduced around the same time, mostly to defend ports and harbours or to attack ships. The tactic widely used was to lay them in harbours so that when enemy ships set off, the mine was triggered and they were aught by surprise. The principle of the new technology was that it was used more and to a more positive effect, taking the war back from one of attrition to one of movement. For the Germans it was now a race against time to destroy the French and British, thus bringing the continent under German control, preventing an American army from meeting. Therefore the entry of the Americans into the war was a very important reason for the stalemate being broken, as it lead to the Ludenrdorff offensive in March 1918, which aimed to break stalemate and win the war before the American troops arrived in France. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Explain how the Schlieffen Plan was meant to work?

    A range of tactics were used during the first world war by both sides such as artillery barrages, over the top, gas and tanks. One of the things tried by generals was heavy guns, with enough shells to constantly attack the enemy's line until there was a break through.

  2. The failure of the Schlieffen Plan - Stalemate.

    * Groups formed to fight conscription such as No Conscription Fellowship and the National Council Against Conscription Included disparate factions: religious, left wing, intellectuals. * THOMPSON: if conscription introduced earlier, war may have ended sooner: fewer French losses. Germany - system of conscription in place in 1870; 3 years national

  1. The Marshall Plan.

    To avoid comparisons of the new approach with the controversial Truman Doctrine, Marshall agreed with Acheson's suggestion that he present the aid issue as a material or technological rather than an ideological problem, and to propose no American-inspired solution. Marshall's advisers were generally agreed on two other points: first, European

  2. American History.

    A key element was separation of powers and checks and balances. - Then there was the whole should we count slaves dilemma...naturally Southern states wanted them counted for representation purposes and Northern states only wanted them counted for taxation purposes.

  1. Explain how the Schlieffen Plan was meant to work.

    It was a shock weapon that most certainly had the element of surprise. At first, the tanks seemed to be slow and would only travel at about 2-3 miles per hour. However, they were rapidly improving. The other problems with the tank were the fumes, the noise, and the leaking carbon monoxide.

  2. The home front (source based work) 1914 - 1918.

    The quote from source C to support her view is that the factory owner writes that 'observations show that women prefer factory life.' These quotes support each other because if the women hated 'every minute' of domestic service, she could not possibly dislike factory life more even if she wanted to, therefore, she liked factory life more.

  1. The years between 1914, when the front trench lines were established in 'the race ...

    that was sent to France in 1914 (164,000) was extremely small compared to the LOOK HERE! German soldiers on the Western Front and the LOOK HERE! French soldiers, this was because the British army was used to control its empire while Britain's European partners armies were needed to engage the huge continental army's.

  2. Explain how the Schlieffen Plan was meant to work.

    This failure was due to several factors, which encompassed; the death of General Schlieffen, the changes made to the plan by his replacement General Von Moltke, the unexpected speed at which Russia mobilised her troops, which ties in with the delay caused by von Moltkes decision to attack the Belgians,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work