• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain how WW2 changed the direction of British Foreign Policy.

Extracts from this document...


Explain how WW2 changed the direction of British Foreign Policy Britain's foreign policy in the inter-war period still retained old imperialist notions. Many Generals and MP's still held jingoist sympathies, believing strongly in the advancement of the 'Great' British Empire. This aspect of British foreign policy Britain was mirrored only by Italy (Mussolini), Germany (Hitler) and the Soviet Union (Stalin). However due to Britain having by far the largest empire it was able to enforce tariffs which gave Britain a huge amount of wealth, as imports coming from outside the British Empire were virtually stopped. The USA had an entirely different policy based around 'self-determination' and free world trade. The dramatic change in British foreign policy after the war was a result of their war alliance. 'The sun never sets on the British Empire' was a common phrase in the first half of the century, expressing the enormity of the Empire as it contained Canada, African countries, the Middle East, India and surrounding parts of the sub continent, as well as Oceania (Australia and New Zealand). The Empire had indeed expanded in the 20th Century after World War One, which meant that the British Empire covered over one quarter of the world. ...read more.


The Soviet Union were most reluctant to sign because they wished to spread their Marxist ideas across the world. As the War progressed there were further differences expressed at Grand Alliance meetings. First, although they all agreed that the defeat of Germany was the paramount issue, Stalin wanted the creation of a second front in Europe to take the pressure off the struggling Red Army. However no front would be opened until the German presence in Europe was weakened. When it became clear in 1943 that the Soviet Union would dominate Eastern and Central Europe after the War, Churchill became suspicious of Stalin. In October 1944 Churchill and Stalin signed the 'Percentages Agreement' in which Churchill hoped to prevent the establishment of a 'Soviet Bloc' by creating spheres of influence. At Yalta the Western Powers conceded Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia to Soviet Union, knowing that once the Red Army entered those countries they would be reluctant to withdraw. Churchill realising that the other Eastern European countries were likely to fall to communism was still adamant that Poland should be free and democratic. Polish borders and a constitution of a Polish Government of National Unity drawn up. There was also agreement over the dividing up of Germany into four zones. ...read more.


Truman demanded money ($400 million) from the US congress to help Greece and Turkey resist communism in what was known as the 'Truman Doctrine'. The Marshall Plan followed in which the USA again pumped money into a war torn Europe to prevent the spread of Communism. Stalin and Eastern European allies refused the program denouncing it as a trick. Another example is that the British Zone in Germany had to be fed which was the main cause for a bread ration in Britain. This resulted in the amalgamation of British and American Zones in 1947. It seems clear that Britain's foreign and defence policies from the outbreak of WW2 were fundamentally linked. Attacked by Germany, with a powerful Soviet Union on the sidelines if things went wrong after the war had ended, Britain seemed destined to forge closer links with the USA (which had almost limitless access to weapons and armaments). Although it saw the importance of a stronger Western Europe to stem any further Soviet Union advances, it made very few attempts to become part of any future European organisation. However, in aligning itself closer to the USA, a country which always worried about Britain's imperialistic past (and future aspirations), the cost for Britain was the loss of her empire. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Why did tension increase in Europe between 1900 and 1914?

    This was ignored. 3 September 1939 Britain declared war on Germany. CONFLICT IN THE MODERN WORLD: INTERNATIONAL HISTORY 1945-63 Why did the USA and USSR become rivals in the period 1945 to 1949? Stalin's point of view * Stalin did not trust the West and was determined to build a buffer zone against further German attacks.

  2. British Domestic life During WW2.

    the city and the countryside as the threat of bombing increased and decreased. This had drastic effects to their lives, as they could not settle down and live their lives normally. After 1941 life got better for these people. Children were now settled in their new foster homes and bombing became lighter for the women working in the cities.

  1. Consider How Far Gladstone And Disraeli Differed In Their Policies Regarding The British Empire ...

    Britain as a whole tended to believe that Russia could upset the balance of power in Europe; there had been a fear over the size and mystery of Russia as she had always been the unknown enemy, which was strategically dangerous for other European powers.

  2. American History.

    They finally won in 1646, and Charles was subsequently executed; Cromwell assumed control of the gov't until his death in 1660. After the bad experience w/Cromwell [the Interregnum] the English decided to restore the monarchy, so Charles II arrived [The Restoration].

  1. The role of foreign policy on democratic transitions in Armenia and Azerbaijan

    Hence, when looking at Armenia and Azerbaijan, in comparison to their neighbours, it is only natural that these neighbours would try to impose their influences on these two relatively weak states to advance their political, strategic and economic interests. Thus demonstrating that while it is important to look at the

  2. The Fall of Classical Greece

    For the most part the two states never directly faced off, this was largely because of their opposing strengths; Sparta's hoplite army could defeat any land-based enemy and Athens had the most powerful navy in the Aegean13. Athens did not want to fight Sparta on land, and Sparta did not want to fight Athens at sea.

  1. The Foreign Policy of the Lone Superpower

    Obviously, the United States was now in the midst of world politics and must remain so if it wanted to remain to be the lone superpower and keep the control of the world's political arena to the itself so as to avert any major conflicts that could propel the world en route to another global war.

  2. What is the relative importance of the foreign and external context of foreign policy ...

    The example of the Third Reich's foreign policy and how the League of Nations responded brings me to another significant issue in the analysis of the international context which is the relationship between larger and smaller nations. As, though it objected, Czechoslovakia was ordered that Germany could reclaim the predominantly German inhabited Sudetenland from them.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work