• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain how WW2 changed the direction of British Foreign Policy.

Extracts from this document...


Explain how WW2 changed the direction of British Foreign Policy Britain's foreign policy in the inter-war period still retained old imperialist notions. Many Generals and MP's still held jingoist sympathies, believing strongly in the advancement of the 'Great' British Empire. This aspect of British foreign policy Britain was mirrored only by Italy (Mussolini), Germany (Hitler) and the Soviet Union (Stalin). However due to Britain having by far the largest empire it was able to enforce tariffs which gave Britain a huge amount of wealth, as imports coming from outside the British Empire were virtually stopped. The USA had an entirely different policy based around 'self-determination' and free world trade. The dramatic change in British foreign policy after the war was a result of their war alliance. 'The sun never sets on the British Empire' was a common phrase in the first half of the century, expressing the enormity of the Empire as it contained Canada, African countries, the Middle East, India and surrounding parts of the sub continent, as well as Oceania (Australia and New Zealand). The Empire had indeed expanded in the 20th Century after World War One, which meant that the British Empire covered over one quarter of the world. ...read more.


The Soviet Union were most reluctant to sign because they wished to spread their Marxist ideas across the world. As the War progressed there were further differences expressed at Grand Alliance meetings. First, although they all agreed that the defeat of Germany was the paramount issue, Stalin wanted the creation of a second front in Europe to take the pressure off the struggling Red Army. However no front would be opened until the German presence in Europe was weakened. When it became clear in 1943 that the Soviet Union would dominate Eastern and Central Europe after the War, Churchill became suspicious of Stalin. In October 1944 Churchill and Stalin signed the 'Percentages Agreement' in which Churchill hoped to prevent the establishment of a 'Soviet Bloc' by creating spheres of influence. At Yalta the Western Powers conceded Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia to Soviet Union, knowing that once the Red Army entered those countries they would be reluctant to withdraw. Churchill realising that the other Eastern European countries were likely to fall to communism was still adamant that Poland should be free and democratic. Polish borders and a constitution of a Polish Government of National Unity drawn up. There was also agreement over the dividing up of Germany into four zones. ...read more.


Truman demanded money ($400 million) from the US congress to help Greece and Turkey resist communism in what was known as the 'Truman Doctrine'. The Marshall Plan followed in which the USA again pumped money into a war torn Europe to prevent the spread of Communism. Stalin and Eastern European allies refused the program denouncing it as a trick. Another example is that the British Zone in Germany had to be fed which was the main cause for a bread ration in Britain. This resulted in the amalgamation of British and American Zones in 1947. It seems clear that Britain's foreign and defence policies from the outbreak of WW2 were fundamentally linked. Attacked by Germany, with a powerful Soviet Union on the sidelines if things went wrong after the war had ended, Britain seemed destined to forge closer links with the USA (which had almost limitless access to weapons and armaments). Although it saw the importance of a stronger Western Europe to stem any further Soviet Union advances, it made very few attempts to become part of any future European organisation. However, in aligning itself closer to the USA, a country which always worried about Britain's imperialistic past (and future aspirations), the cost for Britain was the loss of her empire. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Why did tension increase in Europe between 1900 and 1914?

    * The Soviet Union agreed not to interfere when Germany attacked Poland and also would allow Hitler a free hand in western Europe. * In return, Germany would allow the Soviet Union to occupy eastern Poland and would not interfere if Stalin occupied the Baltic States and Finland.

  2. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    in the vicinity of Zahle. Other SAMs and surface-to-surface missiles were deployed on the Syrian side of the border. Begin vowed publicly that the IDF would launch an attack on the missiles. In response, President Ronald Reagan dispatched to the Middle East Special AmbAssador Philip Habib, who averted the imminent Israeli strike.

  1. Consider How Far Gladstone And Disraeli Differed In Their Policies Regarding The British Empire ...

    Britain as a whole tended to believe that Russia could upset the balance of power in Europe; there had been a fear over the size and mystery of Russia as she had always been the unknown enemy, which was strategically dangerous for other European powers.

  2. American History.

    - Sensing another compromise was necessary, Henry Clay [veteran of the 1820 and 1833 deals] stepped back up and, with the help of Stephen A. Douglas, came up with the Compromise of 1850. Obviously, the big issue was when territories could prohibit slavery [North = ASAP, South = very late in process when slaves hopefully already there].

  1. Why did hitler bomb british cities?

    And then many images were simply not shown, such as bodies in sacks following attack on Catford Girls School. The purpose of all this was to keep the public in the dark. In wartime, it is often necessary not to tell the public everything.

  2. The role of foreign policy on democratic transitions in Armenia and Azerbaijan

    Accordingly, examining the foreign policies of Iran, Russia, and Turkey is a necessity in the understanding of the democratization process, determining whether or not their foreign policies have helped or hindered this process. I suggest that, in general states, act in accordance to their interests, and therefore seek to implement policies within their states that will uphold these interests.

  1. Chinese (Prc) Foreign Policy - the Character of PRC’S Foreign Policy

    THE OUTCOME AND CONSEQUENCES: -Korea remained divided after Panmunjom Amnesty of 1953 -USA pledged itself to defence of Taiwan, and continued to support Nationalist China's membership of the UN -War was a drain on the already screwed up economy, took a long time to fix it -National unity helped CCP and Mao to crush the remaining GMD elements.

  2. The Fall of Classical Greece

    and between forty and fifty thousand women, children and slaves, as well as the level-headed Pericles11. So few eligible sailors and rowers remained that slaves were given these positions in exchange for freedom12. It left Athens profoundly demoralized The plague was followed by a series of poor decisions by both sides.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work