• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain Lenin's Contribution to the Development of the Bolshevik Party, up to and including April 1917.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

A) Explain Lenin's Contribution to the Development of the Bolshevik Party, up to and including April 1917 From 1902 Lenin had been fighting to build a revolutionary workers party, he was expelled from university for writing pamphlets and supporting strikes. Even when Lenin worked abroad, he was always trying to help the revolution along, but without being arrested. In 1893 Lenin moved to St Petersburg, where he joined a growing Marxist circle, then 1985 he helped to create a marxist working class organisation. Lenin was soon arrested and exiled to Siberia until 1900, when he went abroad and helped to create marxist newspapers: 'Iskra' - This helped to unite Social democrats and inspire new recruits. Lenin was playing a role even then, recruiting members who would help the Bolsheviks, and the revolution in years to come. In 1902, in exile, Lenin wrote a pamphlet, 'What is to be done?' ...read more.

Middle

The April Theses show a very big contribution made by Lenin to the development of the party, as Lenin's ideas were the basis for the Bolshevik Party's new slogans, 'Bread, Peace, Land' and 'All power to the soviets' were the messages Russian public wanted to hear, especially as shortages were not getting any less. Lenin encouraged the Bolsheviks to put the message out that the Bolsheviks would give people what they wanted most, the message had not changed, but people were now ready to hear it, they wanted the end of the war. A Bolshevik supporter commented on Lenin's speech in his book 'From Lenin to Stalin': "Hardly off the train, Lenin asked the party comrades, 'Why didn't you seize power?' And at once he comes out with his April Theses...He is called mad and delirious...But suddenly it becomes apparent that he has the ear of the man in the street, and of the man in the factory and barracks! ...read more.

Conclusion

This contribution of Lenin's to the Bolshevik party was not a good one, although eventually Lenin helped in the second successful revolution, it would have been better to wait, and not so many Bolsheviks would have been lost in the first attempt. This was a bad contribution of Lenin's. Based on my research into Lenin and the Bolsheviks I have come to the conclusion that Lenin played a large part in helping the development of the Bolshevik party, he helped them along, although for much of the time up to 1917 he was not even in Russia, he did what he could and was a great help, even in exile. Lenin did have some ideas which even his supporters did not appreciate, and it would have been better if he had not rushed starting a second revolution, and failed. Overall I think that Lenin has made a large, and good contribution to the contribution to the Bolshevik party up to and including April 1917, with a few minor faults. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Russia 1905-1941 'Explain how the unpopularity of the Provisional Government contributed to the Bolshevik ...

    extreme left wing the Bolsheviks, had at some time professed to agree with Kornilov. This wiped out any real competition for the Bolsheviks. The Petrograd Soviets would no longer work with the Provisional Government because of Kerensky's apparent suppression of the military coup, and the coalition ceased to exist.

  2. The Significance of Lenin in the Bolshevik Revolution (1917-1923)

    July proved to be a bad month for both the Bolsheviks and the Provisional Government. Petrograd had erupted with street violence and mass demonstrations after Kerensky had launched a disastrous offensive on the Germans. Soldiers turned to the Bolsheviks but when Lenin arrived at the scene he did not encourage

  1. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    Another, better known interest group of the revolutionary period was the railway workers' union. There were over one million railway workers in Russia at the time of the revolution. From March 1917 onwards, they were represented by "Vikzhel" (the acronym for the All-Russian Executive Committee of Railway Workers).

  2. The Bolshevik Revolution In October-November 1917

    They naturally turned to the Bolsheviks but at this time they were not ready to seize power. In the end the demonstrating turned into riots and troops were sent into break up the mobs. Kerensky used this opportunity to shame the leader of the Bolsheviks, Lenin, by producing letters which

  1. The significance of Lenin in the Bolshevik Revolution (1917-1923).

    on his arrival he made a demanding speech, in which he stated that: there should be no cooperation with the Provisional Government, the war should be ended immediately, land should be given to the peasants, and that the Soviet should take power, the points made in his speech were called the 'April Theses'.

  2. Explain Trotsky's Contribution to the Success of the Bolsheviks up to 1922

    him to become one of the leading political figures at the time. When Lenin arrived in Petrograd in April 1917 he found the Bolsheviks to be few in number and playing a minority role. Trotsky left the Mensheviks to join Lenin and others to oppose the government, and promote the

  1. How significant was Lenin between the years 1902-1918 to the formation of the Bolshevik ...

    One must be careful when using Marx to justify Lenin?s actions, as the USSR theorists may have taken out of context the original meaning, in order validate their regime. Overall, Lenin?s adaptation of Marxism allowed a backward country in the midst of a BR to cut out 10 to 20

  2. Compare the characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin.

    time meant a loss in general production which would then lead to famine. Russia also lost 27% of farm land, some of the best in Russia. It also meant a 26% of railways and a 74% of iron ore and coal.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work