• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain Philip IIs relationship with the Papacy. How far was Philip II responsible for the outbreak of the revolts of the Moriscos, Perez and Aragon?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

3.i) Philip was called the 'most Catholic King', however his relationship with the Papacy was never as good as his title may imply. Philip acknowledged that the Pope was God's representative on earth, but he still kept control of the church in Spain. He could reject Papal Bulls and took a percentage of the church's revenue. When Jesuits emerged to try and reconvert people Philip initially welcomed them but soon became annoyed as they swore allegiance to the Pope. He even arrested and imprisoned a Jesuit leader until the Pope demanded his release. The Pope, being an Italian prince, always felt threatened as he was surrounded by Philip's possessions in Italy. The Pope even made an alliance with Philip's greatest enemy, France, to try and drive Philip out of Italy. Philip acted first when he heard the plans and sent the Duke of Alva who led and army and surrounded Rome. Although Philip did no ask for any conditions for withdrawal, the relations with the Pope deteriorated further. Philip's father Charles had already sacked Rome before in 1527, and these events led to the Pope increasingly fearing Philip. ...read more.

Middle

Many Moriscos did secretly still practise their own religion and more and more laws were creating suppressing Moorish culture such as banning Moorish literature. The Moriscos were often seen as traitors with links to Turkey and Barbary Corsairs who raided Spanish coastlines. This meant they never fitted into Spanish society and felt alienated. The Moriscos were also experience economic difficulty. Their main trade, silk, was heavily taxed and also facing competition from other sources. They were also prohibited from owning slaves and after government investigation large areas of Morisco land were confiscated. This led to Moriscos feeling even more oppressed and in financial difficulty. These increasing tensions let to the Inquisitor General Espinosa being given control of the Moriscos in 1567 and by the end of 1568 the Moriscos were in revolt. Although Philip's troops recaptured over 180 villages, trouble increased with news that Espinosa intended to deport all Moriscos from Granada. Philip then appointed his half brother Don John as commander of the army. This worsened matters as Don John's undisciplined troops raped and murdered victims, causing the revolt to flare into civil war with 30,000 rebels. ...read more.

Conclusion

Whilst in Aragon Perez spread royal secrets including Philip's involvement in the murder of Escobedo. Philip ordered his arrest to be tried in an Inquisition court but the Aragonese nobles saw this as breach of their rights and protests turned into uncontrollable riots. Philip quickly responded by sending troops to the Aragon border and demanded the handover of Perez. More riots broke out and Perez managed to escape. However the call for the Aragonese people to declare war on Philip received little support and Philip's troops were able to crush the revolt. In both cases, Philip was partly responsible for the revolts. The Moriscos revolt was largely due to the build up of tension through the years, but Philip's decision to appoint Espinosa did not help matters and his reliance on Don John worsened the rebellion. His main faults lay with the people he appointed and this contributed to triggering the revolt. The Aragon revolt was more personally against Philip as he never visited but still attempted to assume to control over the area. There had been resentment of Castile amongst the Aragonese nobles and Philip's insistence in the capture of Perez sparked off the revolt, so in this case Philip was largely responsible for the revolt. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. Revision Table - Tudor Rebellions

    Offers pardon and meeting - stall tactic. Askes and ringleaders sent to London. Executed. Commons pardoned. * Cumberland Rising - Bigod plans to capture Hull, Scarborough and Duke of Norfolk, act as mediator with govt. Failed, fled to Carlisle, was captured and executed. * Government agreed to negotiate with rebels.

  2. To what extent was the Dutch Revolt in 1572 primarily caused by Religion?

    Alva effectively forced Orange into rebelling; Orange's popularity decreased, but Alva's attempt to confiscate all his property in 1567 caused him to take the head of the revolt. Alva assisted Philip in taking away local traditional privileges, and undermined Margaret's authority in the execution of Egmont and Hoorne.

  1. How successful was Philip II in implementing his religious policies?

    It is said that Philip, by doing this, was repressing freedom and the currents of the day- not allowing the country to flourish culturally. However the index was not very successful, it became impossible to enforce; it was the 1590s before Philip was able to extend control over print beyond Castile.

  2. The First English Civil War

    In the Midlands, in spite of a Parliamentary victory won by Sir William Brereton at the Battle of Nantwich on 28 January, the Royalists of Shropshire, Staffordshire, and Leicestershire soon extended their influence through Ashby-de-la-Zouch into Nottinghamshire and joined hands with their friends at Newark.

  1. How successful was Philip II's foreign policy?

    Since the early 16th century the Turks had been attempting to expand their empire into Europe, forcing Philip to react. However despite later success, at first Philip was very unsuccessful against the Turks due to surprise assaults from the Turkish fleet along with blockades and poor weather.

  2. The events in India in 1856/7 were caused by the issue of the new ...

    The common fear among the Indian people that the British were determined to destroy their religion was highlighted by the fact that there was increased activity from Christion missionaries in India and conversions of the Indian people preciously belonging to Islam or Hinduism to Christianity.

  1. In the context of India in the 1840s to 1947, how far can independence ...

    This drive towards nationalism was developing even before Gandhi?s campaign began. The growth in support for India?s re-emergence as an independent state, in part led to the formation of the Indian National Congress in 1885, which was to greatly influence the development of nationalism.

  2. By 1598, Spain was essentially bankrupt and Philip III inherited a nation seemingly doomed ...

    1557 meant that by the 1580?s the whole of Spain was importing wheat and making do with bread substitutes. In 1556 trade for Spain had great potential with good contacts in the Netherlands, Spain was able to export a lot of wool.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work