• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain Philip IIs relationship with the Papacy. How far was Philip II responsible for the outbreak of the revolts of the Moriscos, Perez and Aragon?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

3.i) Philip was called the 'most Catholic King', however his relationship with the Papacy was never as good as his title may imply. Philip acknowledged that the Pope was God's representative on earth, but he still kept control of the church in Spain. He could reject Papal Bulls and took a percentage of the church's revenue. When Jesuits emerged to try and reconvert people Philip initially welcomed them but soon became annoyed as they swore allegiance to the Pope. He even arrested and imprisoned a Jesuit leader until the Pope demanded his release. The Pope, being an Italian prince, always felt threatened as he was surrounded by Philip's possessions in Italy. The Pope even made an alliance with Philip's greatest enemy, France, to try and drive Philip out of Italy. Philip acted first when he heard the plans and sent the Duke of Alva who led and army and surrounded Rome. Although Philip did no ask for any conditions for withdrawal, the relations with the Pope deteriorated further. Philip's father Charles had already sacked Rome before in 1527, and these events led to the Pope increasingly fearing Philip. ...read more.

Middle

Many Moriscos did secretly still practise their own religion and more and more laws were creating suppressing Moorish culture such as banning Moorish literature. The Moriscos were often seen as traitors with links to Turkey and Barbary Corsairs who raided Spanish coastlines. This meant they never fitted into Spanish society and felt alienated. The Moriscos were also experience economic difficulty. Their main trade, silk, was heavily taxed and also facing competition from other sources. They were also prohibited from owning slaves and after government investigation large areas of Morisco land were confiscated. This led to Moriscos feeling even more oppressed and in financial difficulty. These increasing tensions let to the Inquisitor General Espinosa being given control of the Moriscos in 1567 and by the end of 1568 the Moriscos were in revolt. Although Philip's troops recaptured over 180 villages, trouble increased with news that Espinosa intended to deport all Moriscos from Granada. Philip then appointed his half brother Don John as commander of the army. This worsened matters as Don John's undisciplined troops raped and murdered victims, causing the revolt to flare into civil war with 30,000 rebels. ...read more.

Conclusion

Whilst in Aragon Perez spread royal secrets including Philip's involvement in the murder of Escobedo. Philip ordered his arrest to be tried in an Inquisition court but the Aragonese nobles saw this as breach of their rights and protests turned into uncontrollable riots. Philip quickly responded by sending troops to the Aragon border and demanded the handover of Perez. More riots broke out and Perez managed to escape. However the call for the Aragonese people to declare war on Philip received little support and Philip's troops were able to crush the revolt. In both cases, Philip was partly responsible for the revolts. The Moriscos revolt was largely due to the build up of tension through the years, but Philip's decision to appoint Espinosa did not help matters and his reliance on Don John worsened the rebellion. His main faults lay with the people he appointed and this contributed to triggering the revolt. The Aragon revolt was more personally against Philip as he never visited but still attempted to assume to control over the area. There had been resentment of Castile amongst the Aragonese nobles and Philip's insistence in the capture of Perez sparked off the revolt, so in this case Philip was largely responsible for the revolt. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. Revision Table - Tudor Rebellions

    * Furthermore, clearly defined social structures can be clearly seen through the leadership of the Pilgrimage; the gentry assumed leadership roles, later joined by the nobility. This was obvious adherence to the Great Chain of Being, as the nobles at the head of each of the nine hosts had not

  2. To what extent was the Dutch Revolt in 1572 primarily caused by Religion?

    Some might argue that Philip was to blame for Alva's actions as he appointed him; however Margaret was also under Philip's control but managed to not provoke the rebels, so Alva is responsible for his own actions. In spite of this, Philip drove Alva into believing that "men should be

  1. Assess the view that Philip II as king of Spain was Absolute in Theory ...

    Philip II, as head of the government of Spain, believed in the divine right of monarchs and used this to justify a number of immoral and illegal acts, and ordering murders. As mentioned by Parker as he gives an example during the decade 1566-76, Philip had 1,200 of his Low

  2. Asses the contribution of the Jesuits to the Catholic revival in the Sixteenth Century

    The Jesuits had long held an ideal of a worldwide mission which was unconnected to the Council of Trent. More than any order or institution, atmosphere and environment, working effectively to preserve and expand Catholicism. In the 1540, Francis Xavier, a Catholic Jesuit missionary, travelled to India on a Portuguese

  1. In the context of India in the 1840s to 1947, how far can independence ...

    suspended all business and fasted to signify their hatred of the legislation. ?The whole of India from one end to the other, towns as well as villages, observed a complete hartal on the day. It was a most wonderful spectacle.?[16] The suspension of economic activity proved to be effective as in 1905; it was greatly detrimental to Britain?s position.

  2. By 1598, Spain was essentially bankrupt and Philip III inherited a nation seemingly doomed ...

    1557 meant that by the 1580?s the whole of Spain was importing wheat and making do with bread substitutes. In 1556 trade for Spain had great potential with good contacts in the Netherlands, Spain was able to export a lot of wool.

  1. How far do the sources suggest that the days of the Raj were numbered?

    Finally source T is from an address made by Bal Gangadhir to the Indian National Congress which was a government group of Indians. The source expresses another opinion, this time constructively and in a educated controlled nature, ?at present, we are clerks and willing instruments of our own oppression in

  2. The outbreak of the 1905 revolution was due to the grievances of the peasants ...

    Peasants grievances played a major role in the build up to particular opposition groups as they were the people socially and economically effected by the tsars ruling. Another cause of grievances to the peasants, a substantial amount of the Russian population was made up of peasants.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work