• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain Philip IIs relationship with the Papacy. How far was Philip II responsible for the outbreak of the revolts of the Moriscos, Perez and Aragon?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

3.i) Philip was called the 'most Catholic King', however his relationship with the Papacy was never as good as his title may imply. Philip acknowledged that the Pope was God's representative on earth, but he still kept control of the church in Spain. He could reject Papal Bulls and took a percentage of the church's revenue. When Jesuits emerged to try and reconvert people Philip initially welcomed them but soon became annoyed as they swore allegiance to the Pope. He even arrested and imprisoned a Jesuit leader until the Pope demanded his release. The Pope, being an Italian prince, always felt threatened as he was surrounded by Philip's possessions in Italy. The Pope even made an alliance with Philip's greatest enemy, France, to try and drive Philip out of Italy. Philip acted first when he heard the plans and sent the Duke of Alva who led and army and surrounded Rome. Although Philip did no ask for any conditions for withdrawal, the relations with the Pope deteriorated further. Philip's father Charles had already sacked Rome before in 1527, and these events led to the Pope increasingly fearing Philip. ...read more.

Middle

Many Moriscos did secretly still practise their own religion and more and more laws were creating suppressing Moorish culture such as banning Moorish literature. The Moriscos were often seen as traitors with links to Turkey and Barbary Corsairs who raided Spanish coastlines. This meant they never fitted into Spanish society and felt alienated. The Moriscos were also experience economic difficulty. Their main trade, silk, was heavily taxed and also facing competition from other sources. They were also prohibited from owning slaves and after government investigation large areas of Morisco land were confiscated. This led to Moriscos feeling even more oppressed and in financial difficulty. These increasing tensions let to the Inquisitor General Espinosa being given control of the Moriscos in 1567 and by the end of 1568 the Moriscos were in revolt. Although Philip's troops recaptured over 180 villages, trouble increased with news that Espinosa intended to deport all Moriscos from Granada. Philip then appointed his half brother Don John as commander of the army. This worsened matters as Don John's undisciplined troops raped and murdered victims, causing the revolt to flare into civil war with 30,000 rebels. ...read more.

Conclusion

Whilst in Aragon Perez spread royal secrets including Philip's involvement in the murder of Escobedo. Philip ordered his arrest to be tried in an Inquisition court but the Aragonese nobles saw this as breach of their rights and protests turned into uncontrollable riots. Philip quickly responded by sending troops to the Aragon border and demanded the handover of Perez. More riots broke out and Perez managed to escape. However the call for the Aragonese people to declare war on Philip received little support and Philip's troops were able to crush the revolt. In both cases, Philip was partly responsible for the revolts. The Moriscos revolt was largely due to the build up of tension through the years, but Philip's decision to appoint Espinosa did not help matters and his reliance on Don John worsened the rebellion. His main faults lay with the people he appointed and this contributed to triggering the revolt. The Aragon revolt was more personally against Philip as he never visited but still attempted to assume to control over the area. There had been resentment of Castile amongst the Aragonese nobles and Philip's insistence in the capture of Perez sparked off the revolt, so in this case Philip was largely responsible for the revolt. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. Revision Table - Tudor Rebellions

    * Furthermore, clearly defined social structures can be clearly seen through the leadership of the Pilgrimage; the gentry assumed leadership roles, later joined by the nobility. This was obvious adherence to the Great Chain of Being, as the nobles at the head of each of the nine hosts had not

  2. How far was the conservative government responsible for the outbreak of the General Strike ...

    These angered miners more which they were forced to plan a strike against them to force them to grant shorter working hours and refusal of wage cuts. The fall in prices resulting from the 1925 Dawes Plan that, among other things, allowed Germany to re-enter the international coal market by

  1. Assess the legacy left to phillip II

    Phillip invested a huge amount of time, effort and money to ensure that Catholicism was restored in Spain. Within Spain however there still lived the Moriscos (Muslims who has been forced to convert to Christianity) yet they were not trusted by the 'old Christian' Spanish and a Muslim invasion was feared - the Moriscos were banished from Granada.

  2. How successful was Philip II in implementing his religious policies?

    It is said that Philip, by doing this, was repressing freedom and the currents of the day- not allowing the country to flourish culturally. However the index was not very successful, it became impossible to enforce; it was the 1590s before Philip was able to extend control over print beyond Castile.

  1. To what extent was the Dutch Revolt in 1572 primarily caused by Religion?

    This arguably supports Motley's idea of the Inquisition being the main cause, however, Philip's intention was never implemented, so was not powerful enough to be the "great cause of revolt". Limm's is mistaken when suggesting Philip tried to maintain traditional rulings, but when combined with Parker has a more valuable

  2. The First English Civil War

    settling the issue the Battle of Edgehill was to be the first of a series of pitched battles. On 24 October Essex retired, leaving Charles to claim victory and to reap its results. Banbury and Oxford were reoccupied by the Royalists, and by 28 October, Charles was marching down the Thames valley on London.

  1. In the context of India in the 1840s to 1947, how far can independence ...

    Nehru emerged as a powerful speaker and prominent organiser. However, Gandhi?s period of inactivity highlights his preoccupation with how, not when, independence would be accomplished, as he believed Indians had to be ready for their own freedom, whilst Nehru wanted independence immediately.

  2. The outbreak of the 1905 revolution was due to the grievances of the peasants ...

    This political group had a great appeal as it attracted the peasants which made up most of the country. These opposition group led to a revolution as there became an underlined hostility to the tsarist system, they had support and were willing to do something about it.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work