• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain the attitudes of the Neutralists and Interventionists to Italys entry in the First World War

Extracts from this document...


Transfer-Encoding: chunked Explain the attitudes of the Neutralists and Interventionists to Italy?s entry in the First World War On the eve of the First World War, Italy?s political landscape was changing. One of the key issues that divided the different parties was the question on whether or not they should go to war. Those that supported the war were known as Interventionists. Interventionist parties included the Futurists, Nationalists, some Socialists and some Liberals. The Futurists, led by Marinetti, desired war because they wished to see Italy be restored to the great nation it once was. They believed that the people were too stuck in the past, so they wished to destroy all records and start again ? they hoped war would help achieve this goal. ...read more.


Only a minority of socialists supported the war, including Mussolini. He left the Socialists to join the Nationalists as he saw the war as a way of regenerating Italy and hoped it might also get rid of the weak Liberal government. He too wanted to make Italy great again. He joined Nationalist protests and demonstrations. As a result, he and many of his supporters were expelled from the party. As for the Liberals, the main Interventionist liberal was Salandra. He hoped that war would help unite the nation, and that the liberals could claim the credit for restoring Italy. He also believed that the war would be short and would strengthen the Liberal government as they would be credited for winning the war. ...read more.


The socialists condemned the war as a capitalist scheme. Liberals such as Giolitti shared these sentiments, as well as being concerned about the state of the Italian army. Many Liberals opposed the idea of entering the war. About 100, led by Giolitti, believed that Italy wasn?t ready for war and that war would be bad for Italian society and economy. The Catholic Church were unhappy about the idea of the war and fighting other Catholic countries like Austria. They kept diplomatically quiet. The Italian public were also apathetic about the idea of war but supported the belief that participation might lead to territorial gains from the Austrian Empire. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Vietnam war

    conduct or activities are deemed dangerous to the security of South Vietnam". This law targeted communists, but predictably, thousands of others with no subversive intentions were swept up by the police and army security networks. By 1961, more than 60,000 South Vietnamese now lived in gaol.

  2. The origins of the first world war

    Austria and Russia, fearing a strong Germany, responded by pressuring Saxony and Hanover to withdraw, and forced Prussia to abandon the scheme in a treaty dubbed the humiliation of Olm�tz. Otto Von Bismarck was the leading Prussian Chief Minister who began the unification in 1871.

  1. "The first world war was the result of long-standing rivalries between the great powers". ...

    This essentially renders any contribution to war from this rivalry down to a short term objective root, in line with my argument. It is debatable as to whether the naval race was a long-standing rivalry or a short term event.

  2. What was the short term significance of Russias entry into World War One up ...

    Even though this means that these sources were produced as anti ? autocratic propaganda and it is highly unlikely that the Tsarina was sleeping with Rasputin, they are still useful as they show the people?s view of Rasputin?s political significance and how this was a factor for the negativity towards

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work