• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain the different Christian attitudes to warfare.

Extracts from this document...


Explain the different Christian attitudes to warfare. Anybody who turns on the TV or radio realises how relevant the discussion of war is. On September 11th at 9:46(New York time) an act of terrorism was carried out. A plane was hijacked and flown in to the south world trade centre, and then twenty minutes later a second plane was flown in to the north tower. An hour later they both collapsed. At this time most Americans must have wanted to go to war and kill the person who had done this, including Christians. In this essay I will answer the question 'is Jesus pacifist' and I will explain the different Christian attitudes to this and warfare Many people say that Jesus is pacifist and these people think war is completely unacceptable. One people who agree with this are called the 'Quakers'. The Quakers believe NO violence is acceptable. 'We utterly deny all outward wars and strife and fightings with outward weapons, for any end, or under any pretence whatever; this is our testimony to the whole world.' A quote from the Old Testament is 'he, who lives by the sword, dies by the sword.' This implies that if you use a weapon to harm someone then you will be punished. ...read more.


Also in the New Testament it says about violence being unacceptable and then it goes on to tell us how Jesus smashed up the temple when he was mad. These all happened at different times so it shows that attitudes must have changed. In my opinion I feel that the bible is very contradictive. I also feel that war is acceptable under certain circumstances and if you follow the just war criteria. For a Christian, nuclear war can never be justified. Nuclear war is a violation of every human right and will demonstrate that nobody in their right mind can justify a nuclear war. Many Christians believe that nuclear war is not acceptable under any circumstances. One person who believes this is St Thomas Aquinas, he came up with the natural moral law. This means that anything that will effect education, procreation or persecution is completely unacceptable. This is because the world has a purpose and so do we. We need to live and we need to reproduce, so therefore, anything that affects this is unacceptable. St Thomas Aquinas also came up with the just war criteria. These were, the war must be proportionate, it must be a last resort, no innocent civilians must be killed, it must be controlled by and authority or sovereign of state, there must be a just cause, there must be a good chance of winning, and finally, peace must be restored afterwards. ...read more.


This meant that if, for example, killing one person would help deter 3 people then it would be acceptable. So he would think capital punishment was acceptable. This also means that he thought Hiroshima was acceptable because 140,000 people were killed instantly and children are still being born deformed, but it stopped world war three, which would probably have killed millions of people. He would also believe that some wars would be acceptable. Like in world war two when the allied planes caret bombed Dresden. It may have wiped out a whole city but it stopped them from killing a lot of our men. In conclusion I think, for a Christian, nuclear war can never be justified because it breaks the just war criteria. It is not proportionate and it will kill innocent people. If there were no nuclear bombs I feel the world would be a much better place. There would be no threats of the world ending or nuclear war. In order to prevent nuclear war, a variety of strategies and tactics needs to be pursued. Trouble spots around the world which could flare into U.S./Soviet confrontation need to be isolated from that confrontation and resolved diplomatically. The spread of nuclear weapons needs to be checked. The nuclear relationship between the U.S. and the Soviet Union needs to be managed and directed through arms control agreements. And the political pressures for building nuclear weapons need to be examined and lessened if possible. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. History Coursework on Hammersmith and Fulham

    This because of the sudden increase of the population which would lead to more doctors having to be called up. However we can not trust this source because in the last sentence he states 'so I'm told' which suggests that he has heard of these issues through others of which we do not know.

  2. September 11th

    Special Forces would attack in conjunction with the air assault. Over half a million infantry and armoured vehicles would sweep across Iraq and close in on Baghdad, eliminating all Iraq armies and resistance. Marines would land from the small Iraqi coastline, which borders the Gulf, and progress to Baghdad.

  1. Dismantling Violence in Mozambique.

    Concealing was also part of the conversations. Civilians learned the dangers of knowledge and speech; they became wise in the ways of listening and speaking; for, "Survival depends on giving the right answers in the right contexts" (Nordstrom 81). Information was constantly altered creatively for reasons of fear and necessity; speaking correctly meant survival.

  2. "War in the Modern World includes terrorism and the threat of Nuclear War. How ...

    scale like that on the Western Front- new tactics were invented due to new technology being available to us. 6. "It must be possible to win. Wars should not be fought against an opponent who is much stronger than you as you will waste valuable lives".

  1. Explain Christian beliefs about justice, forgiveness and reconciliation.

    One example was in November 2002 when one member of the Afrika Corps shaking hands with a veteran from the Eighth Army. Again there was reconciliation between Germany and Britain at the end of the Second World War. A agreement was signed to make the two sides be allies with one another.

  2. Assess whether any moral principles have relevance to warfare.

    These are jus ad bellum, which concerns the justice of resorting to war in the first place and jus in bello, which concerns the justice of conduct within war, after it has begun. As Immanuel Kant's categorical imperative prescribes, where it is not a means to an end it cannot be morally right.

  1. We live in a world of armed conflict. Explain what differing Christian attitudes to ...

    This means that the war must be for a just cause, not for greed, revenge or power. Our motivation at all times must be love. Those with responsibility for the public and authority must also declare the war. The war cannot be declared by private groups or individuals and the proper authorities must affirm it.

  2. Even if conventional warfare is acceptable for Christians, nuclear war could never be

    Many people say that the use of weapons of bulk demolition must only be used at a last resort and that everything considered must be tried.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work