• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain the factors which shaped the Elizabethan Religious Settlement reached in 1559

Extracts from this document...


Jane Stiller U6ARD 01/10/01 Explain the factors which shaped the Elizabethan Religious Settlement reached in 1559 When Elizabeth I was proclaimed Queen in 1558 a new era of religious tolerance began. With her religious settlement, Elizabeth had to consider a number of different factors. Without doubt, the most important task following her accession was to resolve the ideological divisions in the country brought about by the religious changes in the past three monarch's reigns. However, when deciding on her own religious settlement, Elizabeth had a number of influencing factors. She had grown up as a 'committed and conventionally pious Protestant' and these views obviously effected the way she ran her household and country, and consequently influenced her decisions over the religious settlement. Another evident influence was the views of the Privy Council and of her chief councillor, William Cecil. It has been argued that their opinions forced Elizabeth into a more protestant settlement that she originally desired. There are also many debates over the role of parliament and how their personal views dictated the outcome of the settlement. In particular, historians argue about whether the Commons or the Lords shaped the religious settlement to a greater degree. It is also important to consider that Elizabeth had to take into account other factors, not just religion, when establishing the settlement. England's political, financial and international situations all had to be considered. ...read more.


This therefore shows the influence of the Privy Council. However, historians such as Jones believe that the settlement of 1559 was actually a government settlement, influenced by parliament and not the Privy Council or it's members. This idea can also be discredited as many believe that the House of Commons did not have that much influence at this time and it was only the political muscle of the Privy Council discrediting the Catholics which allowed the settlement to be pushed through the Lords. It is therefore crucial to consider the influence of the House of Lords and Chambers on the religious settlement at this time. Within the House of Commons there was a powerful party of influential Protestants. Out of the four hundred and two members of the Commons (in 1559) only two hundred and forty nine were present when the Religious Settlement was passed. There were twenty to twenty five radical Protestants, eight of which had just returned from exile. There were twenty committed Catholics. The concept of the 'Puritan Choir' which Neale introduces, would support the idea that it was the radical House of Commons that forced Elizabeth in to a more Protestant settlement that she had previously wished for. Neale argues that the 'chorist's' such as Percival Wilburn who opposed the return to the conservative 1549 Prayer book, pushed Elizabeth into this more revolutionary settlement. ...read more.


It is clear from this evidence that there were a variety of factors which influenced the religious settlement reached in 1559. It has been argued by many historians that Elizabeth had little control over the decisions made regarding religion. However, from her strong religious upbringing, this is unlikely to be the case. There is no doubt that a number of other factors influenced her decisions. However, it is difficult to gauge and decide which had more impact on the final settlement. It cannot be denied that William Cecil made a number of decisions when regarding the settlement. The power of the Lords and Commons obviously had a noticeable effect also. It can be argued, however, that Elizabeth was a "secular minded reformer" (John Guy) and cared more about politics than her own principles of religion. This would explain acts such as the Act of Exchange and the dissolving of the few restored monasteries. However, it is difficult to conclude how concerned with finances Elizabeth actually was, as there were no pressing foreign policy issues to fund. It can therefore be concluded that there were a number of factors which influenced the Elizabethan religious settlement. All of them were as important as each other, and some were repercussions of others. For example, it is difficult to distinguish whether the House of Commons and Lords acted as a result of manners of the Privy Council and Cecil. The issues in question are therefore all inter-related and it is impossible to judge, without further evidence, which influenced the Queen the most. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Elizabeth I: There is much debate amongst historians concerning the religious priorities of Elizabeth ...

    4 star(s)

    Catholic pressure was certainly a key component to the formation of the Settlement of 1559. David Starkey takes this view as he says that 'All the evidence of Elizabeth's behaviour in the first months of her reign shows that she feared the power of Catholicism'.

  2. Witchcraft in the Elizabethan era.

    Seymour was sentenced to death and beheaded. Edward VI died in 1553, leaving the throne to his half sister Mary who was set on returning England to the Roman Catholic faith. English Protestants, who were opposed to this plan and to her marriage to the Catholic King Philip II of Spain, threw the political situation into turmoil.

  1. Meddling and troublesome(TM)- how accurate a description is this of Elizabeth I(TM)s parliaments?

    The Neale interpretation would lead us to believe that Elizabeth was constantly at war with her Parliament over her reluctance to form a Church of England that was completely free from all Catholic trappings. The evidence used to support this theory is that during her first parliament of 1559 she

  2. To what extent was the Elizabethan Church Settlement of 1559 - 66 motivated more ...

    It was essential to keep the peace in England with this control, and this was another factor motivated by politics. Elizabeth was aware of the instability of England and that the quarrels over religion would lead to political division making Catholic threat from home and abroad easier and expected.

  1. "Conflict and Contest" or "Cooperation and consent," which phrase best sums up Elizabeth I's ...

    They believe that it was William Cecil who organised the delegation to request that the Queen name her successor and marry. They believe that the relationship was of "cooperation and consent". This is backed up by the fact that Elizabeth cooperated with them and promised to marry.

  2. Causes and Consequences of the Elizabethan Settlement

    This occurred immediately after the Elizabethan Religious Settlement was established. Most of the Catholic clergy had resigned and all the Catholic bishops resigned since Elizabeth?s personal preference was Protestant with some Catholic hierarchical structure. The clergy resigning forced Elizabeth to appoint Protestants.

  1. Wht was the greater danger to the Elizabethan Church: Catholicism or Protestantism?

    To further pose a threat, Catholics planned several plots to assassinate and depose Queen Elizabeth with the most famous plot being the Babington Plot of 1586, which Mary Queen of Scots was allegedly involved in. Although it eventually failed and led to the execution of Mary, the English government was sensing danger.

  2. Identify and explain what affected the power of Elizabeth I between 1558 and 1603. ...

    [3] The Roman Catholics? remained loyal to the Pope and a minority engaged in treasonable activities, whereas the English Catholics who formed the majority were loyal to Elizabeth. Despite many becoming recusants after 1570, they never really presented a threat to either the Queen?s person or her Church.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work