• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain whether you agree or disagree with this statement - "The league of nations failed during the 1930's simply because it faced greater challenges then it did in the 1920's".

Extracts from this document...


Mark Cranshaw 11P History Essay Explain whether you agree or disagree with this statement - "The league of nations failed during the 1930's simply because it faced greater challenges then it did in the 1920's" The League of Nations was set up at the end of the First World War in 1919. It began with Woodrow Wilson; he devised his 14 point plan. At the treaty of Versailles in the same year these points were rejected (mainly by France, who thought Germany deserved to be crippled for her actions during the war), but 3 of these points were kept; "National self determination", "open diplomacy" and "the league of nations was to be set up". These would ensure peace was kept and also that there were no more alliances and no more secrets. The main aims of the League were: * World peace * Disarmament The league tried many tactics to help to strengthen itself and work towards these aims. In 1921 there was a conference at Washington. At this Britain for the first time ever accepted parity over her navy. There was another conference at Geneva in 1924. At this countries agreed to arbitration - to talk if any problems occurred. In 1925 the Locarno pact was signed; countries promised to respect each others borders. ...read more.


By the end of the 30's prospects for peace were looking quite good; business was doing well, world leaders had made agreements outlawing war, Germany seemed to have put aside its bitterness, and the league had had some success in solving disputes. What is certain is that the league was successful during the 1920's. It prevented war occurrence during this time and kept the peace with few mistakes. The league did not deserve the criticism that it received during the 20's as it did its job but it did expose its weaknesses - these were exploited more during the 30's. The league failed in the 1930's because of several events. After the weaknesses of the Corfu crisis were exploited other countries began to take more of a gamble with the league. One of these countries was Japan. They were affected by the Wall Street crash and like America in a state of depression. The Japanese believed the only way to show there power and get themselves out of this state was to have a territorial conquest. Their destination was Manchuria, a Chinese province which was rich in raw materials. The Japanese already owned areas of Manchuria; they owned a railway line which ran throughout. ...read more.


No-one took the league seriously after this. I agree with the statement the league failed in the 1930's and not the 1920's simply because it faced greater challenges. During the 1920's people wanted to recover - not fight, by the 30's this recovering was complete. The bitterness between countries began to once again show. Few experimented with the leagues power because they were scared of it, but after its failures they realised its weaknesses and tested it. The Manchurian and Abyssinian crisis' just finished off the league. I believe that it failed because the USA did not join. If they had joined then the trade sanctions would have been more of a threat. It also had no real power as it relied on goodwill and persuasion. Its aims were very optimistic and it had high expectations because of this. Its structure was a disaster. Everyone needed to agree before any action could be taken. This gave major powers the power to veto anything it did not like. For example Britain could have invaded any country and just vetoed any decisions made by the league about it. Overall the League failed in the 1930's and not the 1920's because dictators (such as Mussolini, Hitler or Army leaders - like in Japan) were prepared to defy it after its mistakes in the 1920's. Also it faced much bigger challenges in the 30's than it did in the 20's. History essay Mark Cranshaw 11P ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Why did the League of Nations fail?

    5 star(s)

    Wilson's initial speech upon the creation of the League now seemed very shallow indeed: "...the moral force of the public opinion of the world - the pleasing and clarifying and compelling influences of publicity--so that intrigues can no longer have their coverts; so that designs that are sinister can at

  2. Assess the reasons why the Weimar Republic faced so many problems in the 1920s

    Chancellor Schneidermann resigned, but since the military was so weak, Chancellor Baver was forced to accept the Treaty. President Ebert made an address to the Weimar assembly in February 1919 saying "We have lost the war.

  1. How successful was the League of Nations in the 1920s The statement which ...

    But the League was successful on some small problems including settlement of disputes between Finland and Sweden over the Aaland Islands in 1921 and the prevention of war between Greece and Bulgaria over their mutual border in 1925. But the Greeks did complain about the League being unfair.

  2. Why was the League of Nations a failure in the 1930's?

    Japan was a leading League member so care had to taken-this was a serious test for the League. After a long and frustrating wait, League officials sailed to Manchuria to assess the situation for themselves. A whole year later in September 1932, a report was presented.

  1. Why was the league so ineffective in dealing with the Abyssinian Crisis?

    In January 1935, the French foreign minister, Laval, met with Mussolini in Rome for a number of secret meetings. In these secret meetings they made some secret agreement some of these involved Abyssinia and yet Abyssinia wasn't even there so one of the major powers was making secret agreements with

  2. Causes of show trials + purges of 1930s.

    These were not the only differences between the two potential leaders. The two had a strong dislike for each other, sparked by the differences between them. While Stalin was a bland official, who had reached his position through hard work, Trotsky was a Jewish intellect who had risen to a

  1. How far do David Low’s cartoons show the reasons for the failure of the ...

    Also Americans did not want to see US troops sent around the world to settle every little conflict. So when the opposition to Wilson campaigned for America to be isolationist, the Republican Warren Gamaliel Harding won the elections by a landside.

  2. "Mussolini was an all powerful dictator" - How accurate is this statement?

    Firstly all hostile newspapers were shut down and any critics of his regime were removed while anti fascist propaganda was banned as it was viewed as treason. Moreover any newspaper journalists had to first register with the fascist party in order to gain a certificate of approval before they write anything.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work