• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain why a series of Acts changing the position of the clergy was passed in the years 1529 1534. (12 marks)

Extracts from this document...


Explain why a series of Acts changing the position of the clergy was passed in the years 1529 - 1534. (12 marks) During the years 1529 till 1534 in 16th Century England, there was a period of considerable change in the law, they were designed to do three things; to mass the laity solidly behind the king, to overawe the clergy into acquiescence in his demands, and to frighten the pope into yielding to them. Henry VIII put forward many different acts, all focussing on different things, and each with different meanings. It is not certain why the series of acts were passed, however we are able to suggest different reasons and how they link together. One of the key ideas, and background reasons for some of the acts to be passed, is to be granted an annulment between himself and Catherine of Aragon. Henry wanted the divorce for a number of reasons, including the lack of male heir and the thought that marrying Catherine in the first place may have been a sin against god. Henry wished for Wolsey to secure him a papal annulment of the marriage, however as Wolsey failed to do as the king had wished, Henry looked into other ways, to allow the annulment he wanted. One of the acts passed was 'The Annulment'. Passed on the 23rd May of the year 1533, this act stated that due to the marriage between Arthur Tudor and Catherine of Aragon being consummated, the pope should never have allowed it in the first place. ...read more.


This overall limited the papacy power as he no longer has the ability to grant papal dispensation and non-residence, which before hand would have been granted on their own will, without the need of the monarchy. Additionally, in 1534 the 'Supplication of the ordinaries and the submission of the Clergy' act was passed. This introduced the fine of imprisonment at the king's pleasure against those which opposed, by either speaking or acting against the position of the monarchy. This increased Henry's power as overall it meant that the church was more controlled by the monarchy, it was also in control of the assembly of people within the church, this additionally prevented minor appeal to Rome. Of course, due to the monarch gaining so much power, the popes was limited, by being deprived of legislate authority in England. The 'Charge of Praemunire' was also a major law passed in the 16th century, as it affected many people and changed the views of others. It was first used in 1529, then 1530 then continued in 1531. This act made it treasonable to support foreign authority, the pope, or foreign laws above the Church Of England. If anyone was caught talking or acting against the Church of England, then they could be sentenced to death. This act massively changed the position of the clergy in the church, as Henry had the ability to get rid of any member he desired to, this was not legally possible beforehand. ...read more.


Religion is also a reason however it links with each of the acts, as it always a background, yet main feature. The reason acts supporting an annulment between Henry VIII and Catherine of Aragon, were granted was because Henry was extremely eager to marry Anne Boleyn, have a male heir to the throne, and rid himself of guilt, of phrases in the bible saying that he shouldn't have married Catherine in the first place. The acts resulting in the gain or loss of power, for Henry and the papacy, were passed all in the favour of Henry VIII, making things which were once obstacles easy to achieve without problems occurring, he changed it around so that he, himself was now the obstacle, on again meaning that he could get what he wanted, as everything had to pass by him. Those acts passed, based on the gain of money, link with those providing power, are mostly so that Henry can gain back the money he needs. However, despite all three of the important reasons for separate acts being passed, I believe that Divorce is the main reason a series of Acts changing the position of the clergy was passed in the years 1529 - 1534. I believe this as, all of those which are focussing on the gain of either power or money, lead back to making certain situations easier for Henry, resulting in the annulment being granted for him as he wished. I believe that the majority of the acts, result in pathways being cleared, which would have beforehand held obstacles causing the annulment being granted, harder as initially thought. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Why was The Great Reform Act passed in 1832 ?

    It made the government fear more that there would be a general up rising. The French Revolution had quite a big influence in the passing of the reform act because it contributed with other reasons for the passing of the reform and increased the governments' fear.

  2. How important was the failure to achieve annulment of Henry VIIIs marriage to Catherine ...

    playing sports with them, suggesting that when Wolsey?s relationship with the nobility became strained, the king would not want to risk his own relationship with them over it, and therefore threatening the power of Wolsey, who relied on keeping the king?s favour by doing as he wished, to subsequently remain

  1. Do you agree with the view that the main reason for Wolseys fall from ...

    Arguably it was this trust and his reputation that kept him around for so long. This suggests the view that Wolsey?s fall from power was a consequence of consistent shortcomings which the annulment only highlighted. Furthermore it is likely factional intrigues would not have conspired against Wolsey if he could

  2. The changing position of women and the suffrage question

    became increasingly accepted that women working in higher education did not have to be married. 1900 ? 15% of uni students women 1930 ? 23% Marriage Beginning of time period ? women were the unequal partner in marriage. Feminist campaigning and a significant minority of politicians pushed through legislation that attempted to address this issue.

  1. The changing position of women and the suffrage question. Revision notes

    * The 1869 Contagious Diseases Act extended the 1866 Act to all garrison towns and allowed suspected prostitutes to be locked up for five days before they were examined. * The execution of the Acts was cruel and degrading, it was difficult in borderline cases for the police to distinguish

  2. Anne Boleyn was the most important person in bringing about the Kings divorce in ...

    However Boleyn isn?t the only one to introduce these types of ideas to Henry for Thomas Cranmer also puts across to Henry the type of ideas Lutherans have, to try and influences Henry into following as they benefit him better then the situation he has at the moment.

  1. Wives & War: To what extent did these two aspects undermine Henry VIIIs rule ...

    Nevertheless Henry supported his wife but not her actions in interference with his Church and Parr?s writing of Protestant works, it would simply undermine the changes Henry made in religious reformation (Bingham 2011, pg 81), put plainly having a wife accused of being a ?heretic? put Henry in an unstable position.

  2. Do you accept the view in Source K that the diplomatic situation was the ...

    no way of escaping it and convincing Charles and the Pope that an annulment was the right thing to do. However, the fact that Source K was written in 1968 rather than in the times when Henry was alive -such as the other sources- should be considered when evaluating the credibility of such source.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work