• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain why a series of Acts changing the position of the clergy was passed in the years 1529 1534. (12 marks)

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Explain why a series of Acts changing the position of the clergy was passed in the years 1529 - 1534. (12 marks) During the years 1529 till 1534 in 16th Century England, there was a period of considerable change in the law, they were designed to do three things; to mass the laity solidly behind the king, to overawe the clergy into acquiescence in his demands, and to frighten the pope into yielding to them. Henry VIII put forward many different acts, all focussing on different things, and each with different meanings. It is not certain why the series of acts were passed, however we are able to suggest different reasons and how they link together. One of the key ideas, and background reasons for some of the acts to be passed, is to be granted an annulment between himself and Catherine of Aragon. Henry wanted the divorce for a number of reasons, including the lack of male heir and the thought that marrying Catherine in the first place may have been a sin against god. Henry wished for Wolsey to secure him a papal annulment of the marriage, however as Wolsey failed to do as the king had wished, Henry looked into other ways, to allow the annulment he wanted. One of the acts passed was 'The Annulment'. Passed on the 23rd May of the year 1533, this act stated that due to the marriage between Arthur Tudor and Catherine of Aragon being consummated, the pope should never have allowed it in the first place. ...read more.

Middle

This overall limited the papacy power as he no longer has the ability to grant papal dispensation and non-residence, which before hand would have been granted on their own will, without the need of the monarchy. Additionally, in 1534 the 'Supplication of the ordinaries and the submission of the Clergy' act was passed. This introduced the fine of imprisonment at the king's pleasure against those which opposed, by either speaking or acting against the position of the monarchy. This increased Henry's power as overall it meant that the church was more controlled by the monarchy, it was also in control of the assembly of people within the church, this additionally prevented minor appeal to Rome. Of course, due to the monarch gaining so much power, the popes was limited, by being deprived of legislate authority in England. The 'Charge of Praemunire' was also a major law passed in the 16th century, as it affected many people and changed the views of others. It was first used in 1529, then 1530 then continued in 1531. This act made it treasonable to support foreign authority, the pope, or foreign laws above the Church Of England. If anyone was caught talking or acting against the Church of England, then they could be sentenced to death. This act massively changed the position of the clergy in the church, as Henry had the ability to get rid of any member he desired to, this was not legally possible beforehand. ...read more.

Conclusion

Religion is also a reason however it links with each of the acts, as it always a background, yet main feature. The reason acts supporting an annulment between Henry VIII and Catherine of Aragon, were granted was because Henry was extremely eager to marry Anne Boleyn, have a male heir to the throne, and rid himself of guilt, of phrases in the bible saying that he shouldn't have married Catherine in the first place. The acts resulting in the gain or loss of power, for Henry and the papacy, were passed all in the favour of Henry VIII, making things which were once obstacles easy to achieve without problems occurring, he changed it around so that he, himself was now the obstacle, on again meaning that he could get what he wanted, as everything had to pass by him. Those acts passed, based on the gain of money, link with those providing power, are mostly so that Henry can gain back the money he needs. However, despite all three of the important reasons for separate acts being passed, I believe that Divorce is the main reason a series of Acts changing the position of the clergy was passed in the years 1529 - 1534. I believe this as, all of those which are focussing on the gain of either power or money, lead back to making certain situations easier for Henry, resulting in the annulment being granted for him as he wished. I believe that the majority of the acts, result in pathways being cleared, which would have beforehand held obstacles causing the annulment being granted, harder as initially thought. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. "Anne Boleyn was the most important person in bringing about the King's divorce in ...

    above many others used his knowledge and wisdom to influence others surrounding the divorce matter. In 1532, Cranmer replaced William Warham, as the Archbishop of Canterbury, after his death, as he was chosen by Henry to replace him, as unlike Warham, Cranmer was in favour of the divorce.

  2. Why was The Great Reform Act passed in 1832 ?

    The Sheriff said that the complaints of the mob were attended to, thought reasonable, and the meeting dispersed quickly and quietly. The unknown lady gives an entirely different account, in which she states that the mob forced the worthies to come to the parish church.

  1. The changing position of women and the suffrage question

    bestiality, long term desertion. Caroline Norton?s influence saw the inclusion of other clauses that affected women?s property rights. The Jackson Case 1891 Provided case law for the issue of a husband?s right to lock up his wife, which was made illegal in Mat Causes Act.

  2. Do you agree with the view that the main reason for Wolseys fall from ...

    Arguably it was this trust and his reputation that kept him around for so long. This suggests the view that Wolsey?s fall from power was a consequence of consistent shortcomings which the annulment only highlighted. Furthermore it is likely factional intrigues would not have conspired against Wolsey if he could

  1. The changing position of women and the suffrage question. Revision notes

    * The 1869 Contagious Diseases Act extended the 1866 Act to all garrison towns and allowed suspected prostitutes to be locked up for five days before they were examined. * The execution of the Acts was cruel and degrading, it was difficult in borderline cases for the police to distinguish

  2. Wives & War: To what extent did these two aspects undermine Henry VIIIs rule ...

    It is held that Henry could no longer be associated with a heretic who is claimed to be teaching the royal children of the importance of Lutheran beliefs (Wooding 2009, pg 230); this was questioned by the Privy Council most notably by Stephen Gardiner, bishop of Winchester who also accused Thomas Cranmer of religious reshaping.

  1. Anne Boleyn was the most important person in bringing about the Kings divorce in ...

    However Boleyn isn?t the only one to introduce these types of ideas to Henry for Thomas Cranmer also puts across to Henry the type of ideas Lutherans have, to try and influences Henry into following as they benefit him better then the situation he has at the moment.

  2. Do you accept the view in Source K that the diplomatic situation was the ...

    Henry was also unlikely to manage to get an annulment granted because he had no remotely powerful allies that could stand up against the Holy Roman Empire and the Pope and persuade them. Henry was now in an appalling state regarding the diplomatic situation, it looked as though he had

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work