• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain why free trade was an issue for the 1906 General Election. (12 marks)

Extracts from this document...


Explain why free trade was an issue for the 1906 General Election. (12 marks) There were various reasons why free trade was considered an issue around the 1906 General Election, much of this in my opinion was around the opportunism that was on offer to the Liberal Party. The Conservative Party had been rather factious showing poor leadership under Balfour and had a "3 way split". Free trade achieved a mandate under the Liberal victory of 1906. There was a use of propaganda with the "Small loaf, big loaf" poster which showed that bread would be expensive under the Tariff Reform. ...read more.


Furthermore, the "small loaf, big loaf" campaign by the Liberal Party won favour with the working /middle class electorate - because they were able to actually afford the food. This, as well as the poor leadership that was presented by AJ Balfour for the Conservative Party meant that the Conservatives looked rather out-of-touch with regards to the issue of free trade - he was not able to present the case for protectionism/tariff reform in a suitable way; so this led to the nail in the coffin at the election. Also at the time - the Conservative Party wanted to introduce an imperial preference to encourage people to buy food from the empire. ...read more.


To conclude, I believe that the campaign on tariff reform, most notably the "small loaf, big loaf" posters, meant that the electorate were favourably sided with the Liberal Party in introducing free trade as it simply meant that they would have cheaper food and this was presented with the core necessities of bread. Regarding the imperial preference, I think it was evident that because they would implement a tax in order to implement this, it didn't sway favour - as it meant from two different ways the Conservatives were putting up food prices. All of this as well as Balfour's inability to present tariff reform properly - made it look an extremely bad policy. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

Overall a good answer which highlights the key points well. This is a straightforward 12 mark 'Explain' question which should be written in about 12/15 minutes - bearing this in mind, it is important to keep to the main points and present them succinctly. This answer does that, but it would benefit from a little more focus on the contextual background to offer an understanding of how important this issue was becoming. Perhaps organising the factors into long and short term/immediate would be beneficial to demonstrate how the issue was increasing in importance over time. To reach higher levels, the answer would need to show the inter-relationship of the reasons given, for example linking the longevity of successful free trade policy with the prospect of
higher prices especially for food. While defence of free trade/opposition to tariff reform was central, there were other significant issues in the Election campaign such as Balfour

Marked by teacher Natalie Stanley 01/03/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The Liberal Reforms (1906-1914)

    4 star(s)

    If convicted, children were to be sent to a borstal (corrective school) rather than to prison, and probation officers were appointed for the aftercare of young offenders. Although not vastly, the lives of children were somewhat improved thanks to the "Children's Charter", but children were still exploited to a certain extent.

  2. Why did Labour win the 1945 election and lose in the 1951 election?

    a fight against the fascist Germany, but a struggle for a prosperous post-war Britain" was welcomed by the electorate. The need for a better post war Britain was felt amongst all classes and Labour's support of the Beveridge Report brought widespread support.

  1. "William Wilberforce was primarily responsible for the abolition of the Slave Trade in the ...

    on multiple occasions, and though he did eventually pass the Act, it was with the assistance of tacticians such as James Stephen. In summary, Wilberforce was a popular, influential politician with 'the greatest natural eloquence in England'2, that provided the committee with a parliamentary representative, though he was also a largely incompetent one.

  2. What kind of king does Shakespeare create in Act 3 Scenes 1 and 2? ...

    "I must leave them and seek some better service. Their villainy goes against my weak stomach and therefore I must cast it up," the boy is realising that he must find some better examples of men, he has seen a better example in Henry.

  1. Asses the most important factors that led to David Lloyd George(TM)s downfall in 1922

    to use the military facilities of the Russians, and thus evade sections of the Versailles Treaty. One aim of the conference was to cancel all war debts and reparations; in order to put pressure on the US, the Balfour Note was issued, stating that Great Britain would only collect debts

  2. To what extent was Arthur Balfour responsible for Conservative decline?

    This allowed the Liberals to make use of the resentment against the Conservatives, and gather support for the next election. His non-intervention also alienated him from the trade unions and the lower classes, thus decreasing Conservative support. The Education Act 1902 was one of Balfour's major blunders.

  1. To what extent was Disraeli personally committed to social reform

    Disraeli was never a statesman but a politician whose commitment to social reform was based more on presentation than reality. It was convenient, and not political belief or ideology, for the Conservative Party to be portrayed by Disraeli as the unifier of the classes.

  2. Why did Pitt dominate politics 1783-93?

    The third reason Pitt was able to dominate politics was the weaknesses of his opposition. The main opposition to William Pitt came in the form of the Whigs, with Fox leading the way. Although the Whig?s had royal links, they were of the wrong sort and affected them for the worse.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work