• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Explain why recent attempts to break away from communist control have been more successful then earlier attempts".

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Explain why recent attempts to break away from communist control have been more successful then earlier attempts" Poland, Hungry and Czechoslovakia where the three countries that tried to break away from communism after the World War 2. In July 1956, Poland wanted to break away from communism because the wages went down and the prices went up this had caused many problems. In October 1956 Hungry wanted to break away from communism because so that they could have free elections and withdraw themselves from the Warsaw Pact and become a neutral and independent country. In 1968 the reason why Czechoslovakia wanted to break free from Russia so that different religions could be permitted and also have freedom of press and speech. This was very powerful and made people think in a certain way it bought attention. It wanted people to be equal, so no one would complain in a communist country. The people of Hungry in 1956 also tried to break free from the Russian control, for this there had been many reasons to explain why they had done this. One reason was despite only polling 17% in the 1st elections the communist still took over in a short time they where the government, through fraud, cheating, intimidation and threats. ...read more.

Middle

Britain and France the western countries had depended on the Middle East for oil. The canal ran through Egypt and the oil was transported through the Suez Canal on its way to Europe. The Russians and Americans tried to gain influence of the Middle East and this had caused a crisis at the canal in 1956. Fortunately America had a choice of whether they would offer there support to their allies which where Britain and France or would they help Hungary and Poland which would risk upsetting Russia. The whole point of the summit meeting was to make better relations not worse so it would be a waste of time if relations had got worse. So America had decided to help their allies in Egypt. When in 1968 Russia had invaded Czechoslovakia, America was obviously shocked but still did not offer any support. The reason for America not wanting to offer their support was because just incase of upsetting the nuclear army talks, which had been held since 1963. Unfortunately the Suez crisis had got worse, and America didn't want to be in two places at the same time. The daily telegraph in 1989 had asked the following question " 1989 has there ever been a year like it?" ...read more.

Conclusion

Modern World Study 1 Conclusion. The countries, which had tried to break away from communism control in 1956 and 1968, were, Hungary, Poland, and Czechoslovakia. People in these countries disliked the Russians because Russia because Russia was a communist country. And ruled in 1956 and 1968. The Russians had sent in the red army to overcome the matter of facing economic problems, working hard and earning less. They literally hated the communist rules. The countries expected help from the west because of the Trueman Doctrine and Marshall Plan offered to help these countries who goes against the U.S.S.R The west did have their own reasons behind this promise, which was broken because the current leader, Joseph Stalin had died and the new replacement leader Gorbachev wanted to change the country so he did side with the west so they didn't wasn't to anger him in any way or act out of order before he signed the plan. In 1989 the countries in eastern European had achieved their independence, Russia didn't care to react, as it was far and busy with their own land. The main reason for the collapse of communism in Russia was the changes being brought about within Russia by President Gorbachev as he attempted to handle the countries economical problems. The reason why recent attempts were most successful is that Russia didn't do anything to stop them. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Superpower Relations 1945-90

    o He was prepared to act forcefully against signs of rebellion within Eastern Europe (See notes below on Poland and Hungary, pages 10 - 11) o He was not going to take a more lenient attitude to West Germany. In 1958 he began a campaign to force the Allies out of West Berlin (See pp 12).

  2. Was the West justified in ignoring the 1956 events in Hungary and Poland as ...

    The role of a 'buffer zone' in Soviet political and military thinking is straightforward. Politically the zone in Eastern Europe protects the Soviet Union from direct territorial contact with non-communist countries, and helps to fulfil the ideological requirements of the Soviet Communist Party in its relationship with neighbouring states.

  1. Why did the Communist party successfully gain control of China?

    -Arrange a truce with the GMD -Unite with the neighbouring provenance of Fujaan, which was rebelling.

  2. Why did communism collapse in Eastern Europe?

    It also shows how weak communist rule in East Germany really was. It was this event that sealed East Germany's fate as the USSR realised that in a united Germany, the Communists would lose control. Events eventually culminated with the building of the Berlin Wall which was the ultimate expression

  1. Khrushchev's attempts at modernisation.

    One went to be Ambassador to Mongolia, another became manager of a power station. 2000: Why did Khrushchev introduce a policy of de-Stalinisation? (5) 2001: Why did Khrushchev carry out a policy of de-Stalinisation after he became leader of the Soviet Union?

  2. The Not So Free.

    "So what's the problem" If you can walk this way with me I'll take you to the briefing" Walking slowly towards the glass room where the briefing will be held, John is filled in about the crisis by Jack. "So what's the death toll so far" asks John "We don't

  1. The Fall of Communism in Russia.

    Khrushchev concerned himself with bettering the plight of the individual, attempting to increase the supply of food and making goods such as home appliances, making automobiles somewhat available, and providing more housing. A new policy of efficiency and quality control was brought in.

  2. In the context of the period 1905-2005, how far do you agree that Khrushchev ...

    with success?; however no economic alternative was proposed.[20] If centralisation proved economically ineffective, why were decision not taken to alter the cause of direction ? similar to Khrushchev? Perhaps these are largely signs of a poor economic leadership, on behalf of Brezhnev and Stalin.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work