• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain why Stalin and not Trotsky emerged as Lenin's successor

Extracts from this document...


Explain why Stalin and not Trotsky emerged as Lenin's successor I think there are a number of main factors to consider when investigating this issue. The first thing to consider is the fact that Trotsky and Stalin come from completely different backgrounds. Trotsky was from a prosperous Jewish farming family whereas Stalin was from s peasant stock in Georgia. This meant he understood the peasants situation, as he had been there himself and peasant made up a lot of the population therefore he was quite popular already. Trotsky believed in war communism. This made him unpopular because it caused a famine in 1920-21. 7 million Russian people died and therefore people didn't like Trotsky supporting this kind of behaviour. They didn't want to have a leader who would think it ok to cause famine. ...read more.


They found him arrogant, which stemmed from his upbringing, and they suspected his cleverness. This was a bad thing for Trotsky because people didn't trust him, as they knew he could plan things wisely. People and the government mistrusted him for not joining the Bolsheviks until 1917. Stalin had no outstanding achievements like Trotsky, but he did distinguish himself in the civil war. Lenin had also become concerned by Stalin's ambition and his relationship with Stalin deteriorated rapidly. In his will, Lenin warned that Stalin had concentrated enormous power in his hands. Other politicians ignored this as it was never really published, and they called Stalin a 'grey blur' because they thought he was of no importance, and Trotsky didn't see him as a threat. Leaders were so busy in their efforts to keep Trotsky out and they preferred Stalin's belief in socialism in one country. ...read more.


He planned his bid for power carefully and he made great efforts to associate himself with Lenin wherever possible and got off to an excellent start at Lenin's funeral. He was also extremely clever in using his power within the communist party. Stalin took on boring yet important jobs in the government, which caused other leaders to call him a 'filling Clarke with virtually no significance'. Whilst doing these jobs, he used his position to put his own supporters into important posts and even transferred supporters of his opponents to remote postings. Stalin listened carefully to speeches by Lenin and other politicians and quoted back phrases. He twisted them round to make him seem better, and people believed him. This was another way that he manipulated situations. Therefore I believe that through clever propaganda and key events like Lenin's funeral Stalin rapidly gained supporters, and overtook Trotsky in the bid for ruler of Russia. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Explain why Stalin, and not Trotsky, emerged as Lenin's successor.

    He was also able to use his wit, along with the misfortune of others, to deceive the public into believing that he was the rightful heir to Lenin. An example of this is when Lenin died in 1924. Fortunately for Stalin, Trotsky fell ill at this point, and Stalin was

  2. Explain why Stalin not Trotsky emerged as Lenin's successor

    Trotsky was the man who was most feared by the other senior members in the USSR and in the Bolshevik party.

  1. Why had Stalin emerged as the eventual successor to Lenin by 1929?

    Thousands of Trotsky's supporters were replaced by Stalin loyalists such as Voroshilov, Molotov and Kalinin, strengthening his position with pro-Stalin support within the Politburo. As a cruel twist Stalin then turned on his "allies" the "rightists" as, with his new support, he no longer needed the old Politburo members and had no time for Lenin's N.E.P.

  2. Explain why Stalin, and not Trotsky, emerged as Lenin's successor.

    was not likely to take place and that Russia should stabilize itself with the help of neighbours. This was much more appealing to the Russian people, as they really did not want to go to war after all the troubles they'd had in World War One, and the Civil War.

  1. Stalin Vs. Trotsky.

    During the summer he joined the Bolshevik Party, although he clearly implied that his only reason for doing so was that the party had belatedly adopted the analysis and tactical line which he had espoused all along. His ability and his logic did not always endear him to his comrades,

  2. How Did Trotsky Contribute To

    The main reason people joined is because, as they were mainly peasants and workers, was the guarantee of enrolee's family's welfare and safety offered by Trotsky. With the brute force and pure amount of numbers in the force, the Bolsheviks again won the battle and kept hold of political power.

  1. Explain why Stalin and not Trotsky emerged as Lenin's successor

    They feared and disliked Trotsky and allied with Stalin to prevent him becoming leader. Stalin's major advantage, on the other hand, was his position inside the Bolshevik party. Although General Secretary was not thought of as a powerful position at the time Stalin was able to make it a position of great importance.

  2. Compare the characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin.

    Agriculture was still backwars. Most farms were small, because of the way land had been shared out after the Revolution. The idea was that they worked together and share everything, including what the farm produced. Some of the produce would be sold to the state at a lowprice and ,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work