• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain why Stalin and not Trotsky emerged as Lenin's successor

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Explain why Stalin and not Trotsky emerged as Lenin's successor I think there are a number of main factors to consider when investigating this issue. The first thing to consider is the fact that Trotsky and Stalin come from completely different backgrounds. Trotsky was from a prosperous Jewish farming family whereas Stalin was from s peasant stock in Georgia. This meant he understood the peasants situation, as he had been there himself and peasant made up a lot of the population therefore he was quite popular already. Trotsky believed in war communism. This made him unpopular because it caused a famine in 1920-21. 7 million Russian people died and therefore people didn't like Trotsky supporting this kind of behaviour. They didn't want to have a leader who would think it ok to cause famine. ...read more.

Middle

They found him arrogant, which stemmed from his upbringing, and they suspected his cleverness. This was a bad thing for Trotsky because people didn't trust him, as they knew he could plan things wisely. People and the government mistrusted him for not joining the Bolsheviks until 1917. Stalin had no outstanding achievements like Trotsky, but he did distinguish himself in the civil war. Lenin had also become concerned by Stalin's ambition and his relationship with Stalin deteriorated rapidly. In his will, Lenin warned that Stalin had concentrated enormous power in his hands. Other politicians ignored this as it was never really published, and they called Stalin a 'grey blur' because they thought he was of no importance, and Trotsky didn't see him as a threat. Leaders were so busy in their efforts to keep Trotsky out and they preferred Stalin's belief in socialism in one country. ...read more.

Conclusion

He planned his bid for power carefully and he made great efforts to associate himself with Lenin wherever possible and got off to an excellent start at Lenin's funeral. He was also extremely clever in using his power within the communist party. Stalin took on boring yet important jobs in the government, which caused other leaders to call him a 'filling Clarke with virtually no significance'. Whilst doing these jobs, he used his position to put his own supporters into important posts and even transferred supporters of his opponents to remote postings. Stalin listened carefully to speeches by Lenin and other politicians and quoted back phrases. He twisted them round to make him seem better, and people believed him. This was another way that he manipulated situations. Therefore I believe that through clever propaganda and key events like Lenin's funeral Stalin rapidly gained supporters, and overtook Trotsky in the bid for ruler of Russia. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. How Did Trotsky Contribute To

    Show trials happened after the member was purged from the group. It was a trial which occurred with maximum publicity, attended by the press to make sure the public either saw

  2. Explain why Stalin and not Trotsky emerged as Lenin's successor

    beneath him to actively compete with Stalin for the role of leader. Stalin on the other hand was very cunning; he had the ability to play different groups of the communist party off against each other. He stayed in the background slowly building up support for himself, for example bringing Kamenev and Zinoveiv onto his side.

  1. Explain why Stalin, and not Trotsky, emerged as Lenin's successor.

    He was also able to use his wit, along with the misfortune of others, to deceive the public into believing that he was the rightful heir to Lenin. An example of this is when Lenin died in 1924. Fortunately for Stalin, Trotsky fell ill at this point, and Stalin was

  2. Explain why Stalin, and not Trotsky, emerged as Lenin's successor.

    was not likely to take place and that Russia should stabilize itself with the help of neighbours. This was much more appealing to the Russian people, as they really did not want to go to war after all the troubles they'd had in World War One, and the Civil War.

  1. Stalin Vs. Trotsky.

    his most brilliant success was achieved in organizing the finally victorious Red Army. As war commissar he clashed with Stalin, who ensconced himself at Tsaritsyn with some of his old friends from Caucasus days and flouted Trotsky's authority. However, Stalin was as yet no adversary in the field of theory and policy, which Trotsky considered fundamental.

  2. Explain why Stalin and not Trotsky emerged as Lenin's successor.

    Stalin was constantly trying to portrait himself to the public as a man who was like Lenin, who was very popular. By doing this he could make the public associate him with Lenin who was a great leader and admired.

  1. Why had Stalin emerged as the eventual successor to Lenin by 1929?

    He thought it would help them plan better how to carry out the rest of the communist revolution. Lenin had seen right through Stalin and in his testament, released to the Politburo at his death he revealed exactly what he thought of him.

  2. Compare the characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin.

    In general the workers were happier because bonuses and wages increase therefore they were becoming richer. reduced inflation and working conditons were better off. Due to the NEP the relationship between the government and the peasants improved. Adding to this the improvement in transport because it was helped by the import of a thousand locomotives from Sweden and Germany.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work