Explain why Stalin, and not Trotsky, emerged as Lenin's successor.

Authors Avatar

Gemma Weber                Page

Explain why Stalin, and not Trotsky, emerged as Lenin’s successor.

Leon Trotsky had been Lenin’s second in command throughout the Bolshevik Revolution and the Civil War. He had proven himself as a strong and ruthless leader, an intelligent man, powerful writer, and one of the best political thinkers the party had. He was a significant factor of the Bolshevik success in November 1917. So when Lenin died on January 21st 1924 from a stroke, after an assassination attempt, many people assumed Trotsky would be the one to lead the Bolsheviks to further victory. However, due to certain factors, the role was allocated to a man named Joseph Stalin, who had been seen by many as a minor compared to other powerful members in the Bolshevik party, like Trotsky.

Leon Trotsky came from a respectable Jewish family, with both his parents being Jews. This was unfortunate for him, as Russia had a hatred of the Jews. Nonetheless, Trotsky had proved himself a great, and intelligent force during the Bolshevik Revolution and the Russian Civil War, so this was not a major factor to him not becoming the ruler of the Bolsheviks after Lenin died. However, this would always have been in the backs of the Russian minds, when thinking about the next ruler of the Bolsheviks.

Join now!

Trotsky was also very intellectual which was a disadvantage. He had been university educated, and was also from a wealthy background. The Bolsheviks had always said they represented the workers and peasants of Russia, and wanted someone like themselves running the Bolsheviks.

This was an advantage for Stalin, as he was seen as a man of the people, because he came from an ordinary working class background, and dressed and talked like a normal worker. He had many propaganda pictures of him printed with workers, or soldiers to show Russians that he was just like them.  This ...

This is a preview of the whole essay