Explain why Stalin and not Trotsky emerged as Lenin's Successor.

Authors Avatar

Explain why Stalin and not Trotsky emerged as Lenin’s Successor

In 1929 Stalin became the leader of the USSR, it was not an easy job for him, but through skill and cunning he came out on top.  When Lenin’s death occurred most would have thought it obvious that Trotsky would become his dictator.  He was behind the planning of the November Revolution, he led the Red Army to victory in the Civil War, and he was Lenin’s good friend.  Trotsky was the only party member who could rival Lenin as a speaker and writer.  So why didn’t he become leader?  Well Trotsky had many weaknesses, he was arrogant, and he didn’t care much about those below him.  He did not get involved in any dirty business, and did not make many allies within the party.  Many party members distrusted him, as Trotsky claimed that he wanted to spread the revolution outside of Russia, and the prospect of more war frightened many.  They imagined he would become a dangerous figure with power, as he had the backing of the Red Army, and they doubted his loyalty to the cause.  From his point of view he saw Stalin as inferior, and underestimated him.  He was confident he would become leader and didn’t take action to stop Stalin.  Despite all this it’s not entirely Trotsky fault, Stalin himself ensured he would gain power.

Join now!

Stalin had been a loyal member of the party for over twenty years.  His position in the party was General Secretary.  This meant he could appoint people to posts and he had control of membership of the party.  He used this greatly to his advantage; he placed all his allies and supporters into important positions in the party, and expelled those who would support Trotsky.  Most of Stalin’s work was inside the party, working behind the scenes to gain support and power.  He had a policy called “Socialism in One Country”, and it was based around the idea that Russians ...

This is a preview of the whole essay