• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain why Stalin, and not Trotsky, emerged as Lenin's successor. The race for power in Russia began following the recovery of the Russian economy when Lenin

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Sam Pedwell GCSE history coursework, Russia, question B. Explain why Stalin, and not Trotsky, emerged as Lenin's successor. The race for power in Russia began following the recovery of the Russian economy when Lenin after suffering several strokes and paralysis eventually died in the January of 1924 leaving the Russian people in mourning. For many people at the time Trotsky seemed like the obvious replacement for the almighty Lenin, and it was perhaps because of this, that Stalin did end up as leader of the USSR. Trotsky was previously better well known than Stalin; Trotsky had played crucial roles in both the 1917 revolution and the civil war whereas Stalin played relatively minor parts. Trotsky was a brilliant speaker and writer and a great asset to the Bolshevik party as hero of the Bolshevik revolution after leading his red guard. But perhaps most importantly, it seemed that he was favoured by the godly figure of Lenin. Trotsky's downfall seemed to be in the sense of false security that he felt within the Bolshevik party and his future role of leader. ...read more.

Middle

At the end of the 1920's after a long leadership contest Stalin decided to go for a scheme of rapid industrialisation. The majority of people both party members and citizens supported this and felt that Stalin's policies matched his actions and that they could relate to him. Stalin also put forward the policy of socialism in one country, the Russian people liked this as a policy because it was nationalistic, and it would give Russia a role in history as they would be forever remembered as the beginnings of socialism to which the rest of the world would follow. It also appealed to the peaceful side of the war torn Russian citizens who thought that such a policy would avoid the threat of war. This type of policy was much more appealing to Russia as a nation than Trotsky's policy of long term revolution and worldwide reform to communism, which would mean further war with other countries and money diverted from the people of Russia to support it. ...read more.

Conclusion

At Lenin's funeral Stalin made a speech confirming his "close and friendly relationship with Lenin". Stalin tried to associate himself with Lenin at every possible opportunity often having photos changed to picture the two together attempting to liken himself to the Russian people's idol, which he would use in his campaign of propaganda. Many of Trotsky's party members also feared his loyalty to the party and power within the party, and thought that he may use the might of his fearsome red army to start a dictatorship. It was both Stalin's strong political skills and the weaknesses of others around him that aided him in his rise to power, his ability to recognise an opportunity such as Lenin's funeral as a potential method of both promoting himself and demoting his opposition. He used his political skills to manipulate situations that had come about through luck; he changed his policies to fit in with the ideas of the times and played both the people of Russia and the politicians of Russia into accepting him as leader of the USSR. Sam Pedwell ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Stalin's Impact On Russia And The Russian People.

    Also, Stalin opposed single managers and workers did not control the industry. Following capitalism, wages and even living conditions were linked to skills. Finally, Stalin played a large part in improving daily life for the Russian people after the Five-Year Plans.

  2. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    * Or was it a result of Party bureaucrats trying hard to protect their own skins? * Or the justifiable removal of those Trotsky called 'radishes'? (Red on the outside but White in the middle.) * Whatever the reason, it is an area of great debate.

  1. Historians such as Pipes and Volkogonov have made the interpretation that Lenin was a ...

    Overall, Lenin cannot be easily accused of being a dictator as he adopted the policy of War Communism. This policy involved "emergency measures" that were imposed on Lenin as production fell and the Civil War started, Lenin had no intention of using the economy to establish personal power as he

  2. Compare the Characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin

    He set up the five year plans which were set targets to improve the range of industries in Russia, the power supplies and transport across Russia. This was a long term effect as it put Russia in the same position as world superpowers like America and completely changed the face of Russia forever.

  1. Blitzkreig coursework

    However the failure of the Allies to cooperate was particularly significant in the French campaign. The failure of France (and Britain) to verify defense details with Belgian forces was an important factor in the quick advancement of the German army through Belgium.

  2. During his lifetime, Lenin made many important decisions and policies which affected every citizen ...

    The result was the harsh treaty of Brest-Litvosk in March 1918 and it was one of the harshest treaties ever made as Russia had to give away all her Western lands which included sixty-two million people, farm land, railways and iron ore and coal.

  1. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    Terror was an integral part of the communist system. The 1917 Revolution and the Civil War were both born and maintained in terror. Stalin simply applied terror more ruthlessly and on a larger scale. 3. Terror was necessary in order to complete the economic change taking place from the late-1929s.

  2. Compare the characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin.

    Evidenci which proves the success of the Nep because it was estimated that upward of 250,000 private traders have migrated to Moscow since the NEP was introduced. The NEP leaded to an increase of harvests and food production, foreign trade did also see an increase.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work