• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain why Stalin, and not Trotsky, emerged as Lenin's successor. The race for power in Russia began following the recovery of the Russian economy when Lenin

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Sam Pedwell GCSE history coursework, Russia, question B. Explain why Stalin, and not Trotsky, emerged as Lenin's successor. The race for power in Russia began following the recovery of the Russian economy when Lenin after suffering several strokes and paralysis eventually died in the January of 1924 leaving the Russian people in mourning. For many people at the time Trotsky seemed like the obvious replacement for the almighty Lenin, and it was perhaps because of this, that Stalin did end up as leader of the USSR. Trotsky was previously better well known than Stalin; Trotsky had played crucial roles in both the 1917 revolution and the civil war whereas Stalin played relatively minor parts. Trotsky was a brilliant speaker and writer and a great asset to the Bolshevik party as hero of the Bolshevik revolution after leading his red guard. But perhaps most importantly, it seemed that he was favoured by the godly figure of Lenin. Trotsky's downfall seemed to be in the sense of false security that he felt within the Bolshevik party and his future role of leader. ...read more.

Middle

At the end of the 1920's after a long leadership contest Stalin decided to go for a scheme of rapid industrialisation. The majority of people both party members and citizens supported this and felt that Stalin's policies matched his actions and that they could relate to him. Stalin also put forward the policy of socialism in one country, the Russian people liked this as a policy because it was nationalistic, and it would give Russia a role in history as they would be forever remembered as the beginnings of socialism to which the rest of the world would follow. It also appealed to the peaceful side of the war torn Russian citizens who thought that such a policy would avoid the threat of war. This type of policy was much more appealing to Russia as a nation than Trotsky's policy of long term revolution and worldwide reform to communism, which would mean further war with other countries and money diverted from the people of Russia to support it. ...read more.

Conclusion

At Lenin's funeral Stalin made a speech confirming his "close and friendly relationship with Lenin". Stalin tried to associate himself with Lenin at every possible opportunity often having photos changed to picture the two together attempting to liken himself to the Russian people's idol, which he would use in his campaign of propaganda. Many of Trotsky's party members also feared his loyalty to the party and power within the party, and thought that he may use the might of his fearsome red army to start a dictatorship. It was both Stalin's strong political skills and the weaknesses of others around him that aided him in his rise to power, his ability to recognise an opportunity such as Lenin's funeral as a potential method of both promoting himself and demoting his opposition. He used his political skills to manipulate situations that had come about through luck; he changed his policies to fit in with the ideas of the times and played both the people of Russia and the politicians of Russia into accepting him as leader of the USSR. Sam Pedwell ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    * This is certainly true of the early Purges in 1930 to 1932. They were excuses for the failures of the First Five Year Plan. * Another explanation is that events were tied in with Stalin's personal battle over leadership.

  2. Historians such as Pipes and Volkogonov have made the interpretation that Lenin was a ...

    was willing to grant back political freedom as soon as the Civil War was over. The New Economic Policy (NEP) could be seen by some historians as one of the policies that proves Lenin was a dictator. They suggest that Lenin was desperate to keep power therefore he introduced NEP

  1. Stalin's Impact On Russia And The Russian People.

    transport facilities and concentrating on their heavy industry during the first and second plans. He did not consider consumer goods a priority. When it came to the third plan, some factories were to switch to the production of consumer goods but this was disrupted by the Second World War.

  2. Who Was More Important - Lenin Or Stalin?

    Many of the things Stalin did were modelled on Lenin as he tried to picture himself walking in his shoes. One of these things was terror. Lenin had started it by having his secret police, the Cheka, and through the small number of show-trials he had when he purged ?

  1. During his lifetime, Lenin made many important decisions and policies which affected every citizen ...

    Factories with fewer than twenty workers would be given back to their owners. 4. People could use money once again The NEP was a very controversial change in Lenin's policy and it brought the disapproval of many Bolshevik leaders who labeled it as a step back to capitalism, but

  2. Blitzkreig coursework

    France bordered Italy to the south and the French government�s concern over this led to the French army not being concentrated on defense against the Germans as has been previously explained. Though geography did help the Germans considerably in the polish campaign and less significantly in the French campaign the

  1. Assess the impact that Lenin had on Russia and the Russian people.

    The Cheka killed 200,000 prisoners and imprisoned another 85,000. He only killed opposition and the scale of this killing was considerably smaller to the figures of Stalin who some may argue killed for the sake of it. A long-term impact of this though was that the "whites" (the supporters of the monarchy)

  2. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    This change was often forced on unwilling groups such as kulaks. People were purged because scapegoats were needed to explain away mistakes and failure to meet targets. 4. Hitler had come to power in Germany in 1933 and Stalin feared that the USSR was not yet ready to compete with such a foreign power.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work