• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain why Stalin, and not Trotsky, emerged as Lenin's successor. The race for power in Russia began following the recovery of the Russian economy when Lenin

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Sam Pedwell GCSE history coursework, Russia, question B. Explain why Stalin, and not Trotsky, emerged as Lenin's successor. The race for power in Russia began following the recovery of the Russian economy when Lenin after suffering several strokes and paralysis eventually died in the January of 1924 leaving the Russian people in mourning. For many people at the time Trotsky seemed like the obvious replacement for the almighty Lenin, and it was perhaps because of this, that Stalin did end up as leader of the USSR. Trotsky was previously better well known than Stalin; Trotsky had played crucial roles in both the 1917 revolution and the civil war whereas Stalin played relatively minor parts. Trotsky was a brilliant speaker and writer and a great asset to the Bolshevik party as hero of the Bolshevik revolution after leading his red guard. But perhaps most importantly, it seemed that he was favoured by the godly figure of Lenin. Trotsky's downfall seemed to be in the sense of false security that he felt within the Bolshevik party and his future role of leader. ...read more.

Middle

At the end of the 1920's after a long leadership contest Stalin decided to go for a scheme of rapid industrialisation. The majority of people both party members and citizens supported this and felt that Stalin's policies matched his actions and that they could relate to him. Stalin also put forward the policy of socialism in one country, the Russian people liked this as a policy because it was nationalistic, and it would give Russia a role in history as they would be forever remembered as the beginnings of socialism to which the rest of the world would follow. It also appealed to the peaceful side of the war torn Russian citizens who thought that such a policy would avoid the threat of war. This type of policy was much more appealing to Russia as a nation than Trotsky's policy of long term revolution and worldwide reform to communism, which would mean further war with other countries and money diverted from the people of Russia to support it. ...read more.

Conclusion

At Lenin's funeral Stalin made a speech confirming his "close and friendly relationship with Lenin". Stalin tried to associate himself with Lenin at every possible opportunity often having photos changed to picture the two together attempting to liken himself to the Russian people's idol, which he would use in his campaign of propaganda. Many of Trotsky's party members also feared his loyalty to the party and power within the party, and thought that he may use the might of his fearsome red army to start a dictatorship. It was both Stalin's strong political skills and the weaknesses of others around him that aided him in his rise to power, his ability to recognise an opportunity such as Lenin's funeral as a potential method of both promoting himself and demoting his opposition. He used his political skills to manipulate situations that had come about through luck; he changed his policies to fit in with the ideas of the times and played both the people of Russia and the politicians of Russia into accepting him as leader of the USSR. Sam Pedwell ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    The Terror in context * We must not forget that these were extraordinary times in Russia, with great economic and social changes taking place. * There is no defending the scale of terror, but it needs to be put into the context of the time.

  2. Historians such as Pipes and Volkogonov have made the interpretation that Lenin was a ...

    Pipes claims that NEP was a temporary measure only introduced as a period of relaxed tension so that " ...a fresh offensive would be launched to exterminate the bourgeois... for good"21. Pipes' view is to an extent is right, as the introduction of NEP was accompanied by strict measures of

  1. Assess the Impact Lenin Had On Russia and Its People Lenin was a great ...

    The decrees improved the standard of both living and working conditions for the peasants and the workers. Working hours decreased and the workers now had insurance against injuries, disease and unemployment. This meant that all workers were now much safer and this made all the workers much happier.

  2. Who Was More Important - Lenin Or Stalin?

    Finally, came the end of Lenin's reign when he died in 1924 having suffered several strokes that had left him paralysed. It was during this period that he promoted Stalin to Secretary General but this was one move that he regretted, which was shown through 'Lenin's Testament' in which he

  1. Compare the characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin Both Vladimir Lenin and Joseph ...

    Therefore Lenin was seen as more determined to see communism prevail. The style of government that Lenin used was completely different to that of Stalin's. While the provisional government was in control, in 1917, Lenin made a speech. This speech later became known as the April Theses.

  2. .Compare the Characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin. Lenin and Stalin had many ...

    Important/ key industries under state ownership/control e.g. coal, steel, transport, stayed in the state control but salaries were increased to encourage greater efficiency. Although Lenin did not see the full impact of his NEP, this by the late 1920's allowed economic recovery and more prosperity for people.

  1. Assess the impact that Lenin had on Russia and the Russian people.

    were finally defeated and now there was no chance of the Tsar or autocracy returning. This meant reassurance of the survival the revolution and more importantly, communism. Although this affected Russia, it wasn't a change brought about because of Lenin or the new Government.

  2. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    In the course of two meetings, on October 10 and 16, Lenin managed to win over the majority first of the Central Committee (by a vote of 10-2) and then of an extended group which included not only the Central Committee, but also Bolshevik notables from the trade unions, the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work