• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain why Stalin, and not Trotsky, emerged as Lenin's successor. The race for power in Russia began following the recovery of the Russian economy when Lenin

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Sam Pedwell GCSE history coursework, Russia, question B. Explain why Stalin, and not Trotsky, emerged as Lenin's successor. The race for power in Russia began following the recovery of the Russian economy when Lenin after suffering several strokes and paralysis eventually died in the January of 1924 leaving the Russian people in mourning. For many people at the time Trotsky seemed like the obvious replacement for the almighty Lenin, and it was perhaps because of this, that Stalin did end up as leader of the USSR. Trotsky was previously better well known than Stalin; Trotsky had played crucial roles in both the 1917 revolution and the civil war whereas Stalin played relatively minor parts. Trotsky was a brilliant speaker and writer and a great asset to the Bolshevik party as hero of the Bolshevik revolution after leading his red guard. But perhaps most importantly, it seemed that he was favoured by the godly figure of Lenin. Trotsky's downfall seemed to be in the sense of false security that he felt within the Bolshevik party and his future role of leader. ...read more.

Middle

At the end of the 1920's after a long leadership contest Stalin decided to go for a scheme of rapid industrialisation. The majority of people both party members and citizens supported this and felt that Stalin's policies matched his actions and that they could relate to him. Stalin also put forward the policy of socialism in one country, the Russian people liked this as a policy because it was nationalistic, and it would give Russia a role in history as they would be forever remembered as the beginnings of socialism to which the rest of the world would follow. It also appealed to the peaceful side of the war torn Russian citizens who thought that such a policy would avoid the threat of war. This type of policy was much more appealing to Russia as a nation than Trotsky's policy of long term revolution and worldwide reform to communism, which would mean further war with other countries and money diverted from the people of Russia to support it. ...read more.

Conclusion

At Lenin's funeral Stalin made a speech confirming his "close and friendly relationship with Lenin". Stalin tried to associate himself with Lenin at every possible opportunity often having photos changed to picture the two together attempting to liken himself to the Russian people's idol, which he would use in his campaign of propaganda. Many of Trotsky's party members also feared his loyalty to the party and power within the party, and thought that he may use the might of his fearsome red army to start a dictatorship. It was both Stalin's strong political skills and the weaknesses of others around him that aided him in his rise to power, his ability to recognise an opportunity such as Lenin's funeral as a potential method of both promoting himself and demoting his opposition. He used his political skills to manipulate situations that had come about through luck; he changed his policies to fit in with the ideas of the times and played both the people of Russia and the politicians of Russia into accepting him as leader of the USSR. Sam Pedwell ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    about the Terror was that it could strike anyone, anywhere, at any time. * The victims never really knew why they were enmeshed in the system. Often they had been implicated by previous victims under torture, in an effort to save themselves. How much was Stalin involved in the Terror?

  2. Historians such as Pipes and Volkogonov have made the interpretation that Lenin was a ...

    was willing to grant back political freedom as soon as the Civil War was over. The New Economic Policy (NEP) could be seen by some historians as one of the policies that proves Lenin was a dictator. They suggest that Lenin was desperate to keep power therefore he introduced NEP

  1. Who Was More Important - Lenin Or Stalin?

    Shortly after Congress, Kirov was shot outside his office in Leningrad. Stalin claimed that there was a conspiracy to murder him and destroy the Party. Using the atmosphere of fear created by the murder, he ordered arrests. By 1936, he set about purging the Communist Party to get rid of

  2. During his lifetime, Lenin made many important decisions and policies which affected every citizen ...

    Lenin said that by taking one step backwards they would later be able to take two steps forward towards communism. By 1925 the NEP began to work. As these figures show, food production went back up to the level it had been before the Great War while industrial output increased dramatically.

  1. Compare the characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin Both Vladimir Lenin and Joseph ...

    Memories of Simon Vereschak (Coursework Booklet) Both Lenin and Stalin were devoted to the ideas of Communism and Marxism. Though, Stalin was seen as more concerned about getting power and he was seen as being greedy for power, while Lenin was more concerned about spreading communism through Russia.

  2. .Compare the Characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin. Lenin and Stalin had many ...

    This was central to Stalin's policy of 'Socialism in one country'. As Stalin summed up the situation "We are fifty or a hundred years behind the advanced countries. We must make up this leeway in ten years. Either we do it or they crush us", Stalin 1931.

  1. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    It scarcely matters that party reconcil- ation would have been problematic even without Lenin's opposition---He was resented for not even wanting to try, and for making his views known in such a callous manner and at such an inappropriate time.

  2. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    Regarded by many as Stalin?s eventual successor (this was a dangerous reputation to have). 6. Regarded as a more liberal Communist. 7. Prepared to argue with Stalin over some policies ? opposed Stalin?s attempt to have Ryutin executed. 1.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work