• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain why Stalin, and not Trotsky, emerged as Lenin's successor. The race for power in Russia began following the recovery of the Russian economy when Lenin

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Sam Pedwell GCSE history coursework, Russia, question B. Explain why Stalin, and not Trotsky, emerged as Lenin's successor. The race for power in Russia began following the recovery of the Russian economy when Lenin after suffering several strokes and paralysis eventually died in the January of 1924 leaving the Russian people in mourning. For many people at the time Trotsky seemed like the obvious replacement for the almighty Lenin, and it was perhaps because of this, that Stalin did end up as leader of the USSR. Trotsky was previously better well known than Stalin; Trotsky had played crucial roles in both the 1917 revolution and the civil war whereas Stalin played relatively minor parts. Trotsky was a brilliant speaker and writer and a great asset to the Bolshevik party as hero of the Bolshevik revolution after leading his red guard. But perhaps most importantly, it seemed that he was favoured by the godly figure of Lenin. Trotsky's downfall seemed to be in the sense of false security that he felt within the Bolshevik party and his future role of leader. ...read more.

Middle

At the end of the 1920's after a long leadership contest Stalin decided to go for a scheme of rapid industrialisation. The majority of people both party members and citizens supported this and felt that Stalin's policies matched his actions and that they could relate to him. Stalin also put forward the policy of socialism in one country, the Russian people liked this as a policy because it was nationalistic, and it would give Russia a role in history as they would be forever remembered as the beginnings of socialism to which the rest of the world would follow. It also appealed to the peaceful side of the war torn Russian citizens who thought that such a policy would avoid the threat of war. This type of policy was much more appealing to Russia as a nation than Trotsky's policy of long term revolution and worldwide reform to communism, which would mean further war with other countries and money diverted from the people of Russia to support it. ...read more.

Conclusion

At Lenin's funeral Stalin made a speech confirming his "close and friendly relationship with Lenin". Stalin tried to associate himself with Lenin at every possible opportunity often having photos changed to picture the two together attempting to liken himself to the Russian people's idol, which he would use in his campaign of propaganda. Many of Trotsky's party members also feared his loyalty to the party and power within the party, and thought that he may use the might of his fearsome red army to start a dictatorship. It was both Stalin's strong political skills and the weaknesses of others around him that aided him in his rise to power, his ability to recognise an opportunity such as Lenin's funeral as a potential method of both promoting himself and demoting his opposition. He used his political skills to manipulate situations that had come about through luck; he changed his policies to fit in with the ideas of the times and played both the people of Russia and the politicians of Russia into accepting him as leader of the USSR. Sam Pedwell ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Stalin's Impact On Russia And The Russian People.

    There is much that could be and was criticised in the Five-Year Plans. Certainly there was a great deal of inefficiency, duplication of effort and waste, although the evidence shows that the Soviets did learn from their mistakes in the second and third Five-Year Plans.

  2. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    The Terror in context * We must not forget that these were extraordinary times in Russia, with great economic and social changes taking place. * There is no defending the scale of terror, but it needs to be put into the context of the time.

  1. Historians such as Pipes and Volkogonov have made the interpretation that Lenin was a ...

    food from the countryside and that production continued during the Civil War. Most importantly it can not be overlooked that War Communism was only a temporary measure. As soon as the Civil War come to an end War Communism was replaced by the New Economic Policy; which granted workers more

  2. During his lifetime, Lenin made many important decisions and policies which affected every citizen ...

    The peasants were delighted that they would be given the opportunity to own their land. Until 1861 most of the majority of peasants had been serfs, owned by their masters. In 1861 they had been freed and were allocated a share of land which they could buy with money loaned by the Government.

  1. Compare the Characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin

    He set up the five year plans which were set targets to improve the range of industries in Russia, the power supplies and transport across Russia. This was a long term effect as it put Russia in the same position as world superpowers like America and completely changed the face of Russia forever.

  2. Who Was More Important - Lenin Or Stalin?

    This was contradicting Marxism, which angered many Bolsheviks. He claimed that the country needed a "breathing space" but some did not see it in this light. Lenin was a true follower of Marxism, founded by Karl Marx. This meant that he wanted a Communist society and for the workers (the proletariat)

  1. Blitzkreig coursework

    stunning effect the surprise element of Blitzkrieg, this was a significant contributory factor in the German initial breakthrough which attributed to their success. Another mistake made by their Allies was their failure to cooperate to make significant their numerical advantage over the German Army.

  2. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    The assassin insisted he had acted alone, but he was executed with several other alleged accomplices. Consequences of the Kirov assassination: 1. Stalin used the event as an excuse to implement a reign of terror, first against leading party or ex-party members.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work