• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain why Stalin, and not Trotsky, emerged as Lenin's successor.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

2. Explain why Stalin, and not Trotsky, emerged as Lenin's successor. As Lenin approached his final years of power, he was left with two main concerns. Firstly, he was becoming increasingly alarmed about the gradual movement of partial communism to full communism. This tied in closely with his second, and more important concern of who was to become his successor. As Lenin became increasingly ill, there was rising tension between the two likely candidates to replace Lenin. Initially, it looked as though Trotsky was the rightful heir. Having served well in planning the revolution, he was well respected by troops, an extremely good public speaker, an outstanding organiser, and a keen writer of revolutionary ideas. Stalin on the other hand was seen as dull and humourless and didn't get on personally with Lenin, yet there are a number of reasons why he emerged as Lenin's successor. To begin with, whilst the to important leaders of the Communist Part, Kamenev and Zinoviev agreed with Trotsky Politically, they very much disliked him personally, and therefore formed an alliance with Stalin to prevent him coming to power. ...read more.

Middle

Trotsky was also extremely arrogant, and showed very little interest in making alliances. He spared very little attention to those who he believed were stupid, and made little attempt at getting people on his side. It is for this reason that Trotsky became extremely unpopular with both those who disagreed with him, but also those who agreed with him politically, such as Kamenev and Zinoviev, who would have noticed his lack of interest in expanding the Bolshevik party. In addition to this, Trotsky refused to get involved with political fighting, and therefore it is possible that he did not put one hundred percent into battling with Stalin for power. Stalin on the other hand was much more resourceful and cunning in the way he approached things. He was able to play off the left and right wing groups of the Communist Party causing them to turn against each other. For example, he played off the right-wing party members, Kamenev and Zinoviev, using their fear of right wing members such as Trotsky, and international communism to persuade them to form an alliance with him. ...read more.

Conclusion

Having said this, Stalin's 'Socialism in One County' proposal was unpopular amongst many left-wing members of the Communist party, however he was able to use the new support gained from his recent proposals to overcome this opposition, and ousted the left-wing members from their positions. The final event that helped Stalin into power was his survival of Lenin's Testament. Shortly before his death, Lenin wrote letter to the party congress to be read out after his death. In it, Lenin recommended that Stalin should be removed from his position as General Secretary of the Communist Party, and replaced. Things did not look good for Stalin if this letter was to get out, however to his delight, the Central Committee took the decision not to publish this letter, in order to avoid provoking further disunity after the civil war. By 1928, Stalin had achieved charge of the Soviet union, and successfully blocked Trotsky from following in Lenin's footsteps. In my opinion, this is largely down to his extremely strong position within the party, and his luck in avoiding Lenin's testament being published. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Historians such as Pipes and Volkogonov have made the interpretation that Lenin was a ...

    In addition to their historical opinions there are historical facts suggesting their argument is wrong. The interpretation that Lenin used terror simply as a means of enforcing his policies and establishing control has been questioned by other historians who see the policy of the Red Terror as a temporary measure

  2. The enormous role that Trotsky played in the success of the Bolsheviks up until ...

    Or perhaps it was his complete and utter belief. Belief in Lenin, belief in his army, belief in communism, his cause and the ideology of himself and others that gave him the determination and the ability to succeed. Whatever the reason, there is no doubt that Trotsky played a key role in the take over of the Bolsheviks.

  1. Stalin Vs. Trotsky.

    This was the decisive blow. Although he was still not completely crushed, Trotsky receded to the background. If he had been another kind of man, he might have tried to use the Red Army against his adversaries, but his loyalty to the Party was paramount, and he accepted his deposition without trying to resist.

  2. Explain why Stalin not Trotsky emerged as Lenin's successor

    Trotsky refused to compete for leadership. He was absent at Lenin's funeral saying that Stalin had told him the wrong date he told him it was on the 26th when really it was on 27th January 1924, because Trotsky was in the south of Russia, and he could not get

  1. Explain why Stalin and not Trotsky emerged as Lenin's successor

    They feared and disliked Trotsky and allied with Stalin to prevent him becoming leader. Stalin's major advantage, on the other hand, was his position inside the Bolshevik party. Although General Secretary was not thought of as a powerful position at the time Stalin was able to make it a position of great importance.

  2. Explain why Stalin and not Trotsky emerged as Lenin's successor

    Trotsky was the most obvious successor after Lenin. He was the best known of the communist leaders after Lenin. He was extremely able as he had organised the Bolshevik takeover and saved the entire Bolshevik government. He had a reputation outside the Soviet Union and was well known across Russia.

  1. Explain why Stalin, and not Trotsky, emerged as Lenin's successor.

    He had many propaganda pictures of him printed with workers, or soldiers to show Russians that he was just like them. This straight away gave him an advantage over Trotsky, as Trotsky was arrogant and did not want to be seen as an ordinary worker, he wanted to be seen as a powerful leader.

  2. Compare the characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin.

    Lenin sent Trotsky to meet the Germans to negotiate a peace treaty. Trotsky walked out of the talks because the Germans demanded too much territory. He said there would be ��no peace, no war.�� However,Lenin sent him back, because he was sure that the Bolsheviks would stay in power only if the war could be ended quickly.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work