• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain why Stalin, and not Trotsky, emerged as Lenin's successor.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

2. Explain why Stalin, and not Trotsky, emerged as Lenin's successor. As Lenin approached his final years of power, he was left with two main concerns. Firstly, he was becoming increasingly alarmed about the gradual movement of partial communism to full communism. This tied in closely with his second, and more important concern of who was to become his successor. As Lenin became increasingly ill, there was rising tension between the two likely candidates to replace Lenin. Initially, it looked as though Trotsky was the rightful heir. Having served well in planning the revolution, he was well respected by troops, an extremely good public speaker, an outstanding organiser, and a keen writer of revolutionary ideas. Stalin on the other hand was seen as dull and humourless and didn't get on personally with Lenin, yet there are a number of reasons why he emerged as Lenin's successor. To begin with, whilst the to important leaders of the Communist Part, Kamenev and Zinoviev agreed with Trotsky Politically, they very much disliked him personally, and therefore formed an alliance with Stalin to prevent him coming to power. ...read more.

Middle

Trotsky was also extremely arrogant, and showed very little interest in making alliances. He spared very little attention to those who he believed were stupid, and made little attempt at getting people on his side. It is for this reason that Trotsky became extremely unpopular with both those who disagreed with him, but also those who agreed with him politically, such as Kamenev and Zinoviev, who would have noticed his lack of interest in expanding the Bolshevik party. In addition to this, Trotsky refused to get involved with political fighting, and therefore it is possible that he did not put one hundred percent into battling with Stalin for power. Stalin on the other hand was much more resourceful and cunning in the way he approached things. He was able to play off the left and right wing groups of the Communist Party causing them to turn against each other. For example, he played off the right-wing party members, Kamenev and Zinoviev, using their fear of right wing members such as Trotsky, and international communism to persuade them to form an alliance with him. ...read more.

Conclusion

Having said this, Stalin's 'Socialism in One County' proposal was unpopular amongst many left-wing members of the Communist party, however he was able to use the new support gained from his recent proposals to overcome this opposition, and ousted the left-wing members from their positions. The final event that helped Stalin into power was his survival of Lenin's Testament. Shortly before his death, Lenin wrote letter to the party congress to be read out after his death. In it, Lenin recommended that Stalin should be removed from his position as General Secretary of the Communist Party, and replaced. Things did not look good for Stalin if this letter was to get out, however to his delight, the Central Committee took the decision not to publish this letter, in order to avoid provoking further disunity after the civil war. By 1928, Stalin had achieved charge of the Soviet union, and successfully blocked Trotsky from following in Lenin's footsteps. In my opinion, this is largely down to his extremely strong position within the party, and his luck in avoiding Lenin's testament being published. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Explain why Stalin not Trotsky emerged as Lenin's successor

    to the funeral on the 26th but could get there for the 27th. Stalin did this, because he wanted to fool Trotsky, and to fool other people, in to showing that Trotsky did not care about Lenin that is why Stalin did it (Trotsky did not appear).

  2. Explain why Stalin and not Trotsky emerged as Lenin's successor

    To many party members this seemed an achievable aim. Also he had been a loyal member of the Bolsheviks for 20 years. Many supported him because of his apparently safe middle of the road views. People were worried the party would split up after Lenin's death as the Civil war had already divided the country.

  1. Explain why Stalin and not Trotsky emerged as Lenin's successor

    Unfortunately for Trotsky he was ill and also on holiday for the funeral and so was absent, while Stalin stole the limelight. Once again, Stalin took another chance that he saw. He phoned Trotsky to tell him that he wouldn't get back in time for the funeral, which he lied

  2. The enormous role that Trotsky played in the success of the Bolsheviks up until ...

    Or perhaps it was his complete and utter belief. Belief in Lenin, belief in his army, belief in communism, his cause and the ideology of himself and others that gave him the determination and the ability to succeed. Whatever the reason, there is no doubt that Trotsky played a key role in the take over of the Bolsheviks.

  1. Explain why Stalin, and not Trotsky, emerged as Lenin's successor.

    Stalin was also ingeniously cunning. He took dull, but important jobs in the Bolshevik party to build up supporters, like the job of General Secretary. He worked very hard, which gained him respect, and therefore helped him gain supporters.

  2. Stalin Vs. Trotsky.

    In a few short weeks nearly a quarter of a million men and women were admitted in the new "Lenin enrollment." At the time of the XIII Party Congress in May 1924, the economic situation was improving sufficiently to enable the triumvirs to call their critics to account.

  1. Historians such as Pipes and Volkogonov have made the interpretation that Lenin was a ...

    Furthermore the Politburo consisted of members chosen by the Central Committee. Volkogonov explains that "there was never a debate about it power"3; this he believes was achieved as "State power has been handed over to the so-called Party organ which was in fact the main instrument of the Bolshevik dictatorship"4.

  2. Explain why Stalin and not Trotsky emerged as Lenin's Successor.

    Despite all this it's not entirely Trotsky fault, Stalin himself ensured he would gain power. Stalin had been a loyal member of the party for over twenty years. His position in the party was General Secretary. This meant he could appoint people to posts and he had control of membership of the party.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work