• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain why the United States became increasingly involved in the war in Vietnam.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Assignment: Model B: Vietnam Q1/ Explain why the United States became increasingly involved in the war in Vietnam. There were a numerous amount of reasons for the US getting involved in Vietnam and then increasing its involvement. It first got involved to contain communism, a long-term cause of US involvement. They believed in the "domino theory" which stated that if Vietnam fell to communist rule, and then so would all of Indo-China. Therefore it decided to support South Vietnam financially and militarily and sent in 11,000 troops under Kennedy's presidency in December 1962. By 1965, 180,000 US troops were fighting in Vietnam - an increase of 169,000 troops in roughly 3 years! This figure increased further to 500,000 soldiers by 1968. Now that we know what happened, as historians we must ask ourselves why. I believe that the major reason for this was that the Americans underestimated the Viet Cong, supplied and supported by China and the Soviet Union, and were not ready or well trained enough to fight against them. I know this is true because the guerilla tactics used by the Viet Cong did not suit the American style of conventional warfare. ...read more.

Middle

It is an extract from a book, "Four Hours in My Lai", published in 1992. It is a secondary source, which means the writer has had insight into all the occurrences of the war and can use other resources and references to form his book or conclusions. He also had no wartime pressure and could write whatever he wanted. However, we are not given the whole book to see all his interpretations of problems faced by US troops and are only given this clip of information. Also, it is limited because My Lai is the focus of the book, so it does not show the whole picture of the Vietnam War. A British journalist who is using secondary sources to create his interpretation writes this source and he was not present in Vietnam. Therefore the source is limited as it does not show the whole picture or the full argument but only gives us one of many problems for the US. Despite the fact that I totally agree with the interpretation of the source, I feel that more information is needed to form a stable argument as to the problems faced, like photographs, newspaper articles, cartoons, extracts from encyclopedias and quotes made by various historians. ...read more.

Conclusion

There were Vietnamese people talking about how they saw their own sisters get raped and their relatives and friends were shot and their houses burnt to the ground in front of their eyes. So how would people living in the US knowing that their country is sending their friends and relatives to commit such atrocities react? This again acts as evidence as to why there were anti-war feelings throughout the globe. The source however is again limited because its focus is My Lai. Plus, we know from various sources that My Lai was hidden for a while and so the My Lai massacre would not have been the reason for anti-war movements in the US, but a reason for it. In conclusion, we can understand that the sources alone do not provide enough to explain the reasons for anti-war feeling in America. The sources show US atrocities and also US policies and lies which all draw the conclusion that the war was unjustifiable, but their limitations dhow us that more evidence is needed. Together they provide us with a clearer picture but I believe that more sources and more historical events, such as the Kent State University protest, should be cross-referenced to help us to understand why the US civilians felt the need to demonstrate their opinions by protesting. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Explain why America became increasingly involved in the affairs of Vietnam

    3 star(s)

    But the real cause of their anger was Diem's anti-Buddhist polices. Buddhists, unlike Catholics, had to have government permission to carry out their acts of worship. Diem also had a law, which banned all flags except the flag of Vietnam.

  2. Was the My Lai Massacre a failure in the Rules of Engagement or a ...

    For four months the Peers Panel interviewed 398 witnesses, ranging from General Koster to soldiers of the Charlie Company. More then 20,000 pages of testimony where recorded by the Army and House of Representatives. The report asked for action to be taken against dozens of soldiers who had committed rape, murder, or participated in the cover-up.

  1. Source A is an extract from a book written by John F Kennedy, before ...

    They had very little experience with the kind of warfare that the VC chose to fight in Vietnam. Even when the Vietcong did fight a set-piece battle, as source C says, 'these encounters achieved nothing.' Furthermore, as explained by Source E, the Vietcong had support amongst the people of Vietnam

  2. What can you learn from Source A about the reasons for US involvement in ...

    People began to think that it was not right to impose the American political system on to another, completely different, culture. Another reason why public opinion changed was the death toll of US soldiers. Many people could not understand how so many soldiers could be killed by a so-called 'backward

  1. How Useful are Sources A-C to explain why the United States became involved in ...

    I also know that the short term reason for the USA sending troops to Vietnam was to deafest the NLF because Johnson told his Joint Chiefs of staff that he would do all that was necessary to prevent the NLF winning in South Vietnam but was unwilling to take unpopular

  2. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    Father Suleiman Abu Khalil and Father Albert Sherfan, two priests, also ''disappeared'' during the events of 13 October 1990. Father Albert Sherfan was the head of the Deir al-Qalaa Monastery in Beit Meri and Father Suleiman was the treasurer. On 13 October 1990 it was reported that the Syrian forces

  1. Why the US became increasingly involved in the war in Vietnam

    The communist controlled the North and a non-Communist Government controlled the South. Diem was a catholic in a predominantly Buddhist country, this did not stand well with the Buddhists. Diem made his relations with the Buddhist because he persecuted the Buddhists by barring the festivals, destroying their monasteries.

  2. How useful are sources A to C to explain why the United States became ...

    Johnson has used the bible to gain public support, as he says, 'Hithertho shalt thou come, but no further...' He has done this because a lot of the United State's population were Christians so it would persuade them to think that going into war is morally the correct thing to do.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work