• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain why the United States withdrew its forces from Vietnam in 1973.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History Coursework Rebecca Trenner 1. Explain why the United States withdrew its forces from Vietnam in 1973. The United States withdrew its forces in Vietnam for many reasons, but mainly because they saw no prospect of victory. The number of US casualties was increasing and the Vietcong seemed able to absorb any number of losses. Public opinion in the US was turning against the war and Nixon knew that his prospects of a second term depended on winning over public opinion. Also the US was getting little support from the South Vietnamese government whilst the Vietcong had support from China and the USSR. The Vietcong were much better adapted to fighting in the jungle than the US. Unlike conventional wars in which the Americans had fought, the war in Vietnam had no defined front lines. The intense heat made it difficult for them to see where they were going, carry weapons and move swiftly. As much of Vietnam was covered in jungle, swamp and paddy fields, it soon became clear that the terrain was unsuitable for tanks. This led to an increase in the use of helicopters as troop carriers and heavy goods vehicles for moving guns, vehicles, ammunition, supplies and even boats across jungles and hills. ...read more.

Middle

An added problem was that, although the Government of South Vietnam was supposed to be working with the Americans, they did little to help with the war. The Government was corrupt, and so, South Vietnamese boys were never forced to help with the fighting - the Americans were forced to fight alone. American losses in the war (in terms of life and money) continued to rise. In November 1967, the Pentagon announced that total US casualties in Vietnam since the beginning of 1961 had reached 15,058 killed and 109,527 wounded. The president estimated the cost of the war to be approximately $25 billion per year. The US soldiers already had low morale because of the vast number of casualties, but adding to this was the fact that they knew that the war and their involvement in it was not supported back in America. The increasing numbers of casualties meant that public opinion back in the US was turning against the war. When the Vietnam War started only a small percentage of the American population opposed the war. Those who initially objected to the involvement in Vietnam fell into three broad categories: communists who wanted an NLF victory; pacifists who opposed all wars; and liberals who believed that the best way of stopping the spread of communism was by encouraging democratic, rather than authoritarian governments. ...read more.

Conclusion

Soon after taking office Nixon introduced his policy of Vietnamisation. The plan was to encourage the South Vietnamese to take more responsibility for fighting the war. It was hoped that this policy would eventually enable the United States to gradually withdraw all their soldiers from Vietnam. To increase the size of the ARVN, a mobilisation law was passed that called up all men in South Vietnam aged between seventeen and forty-three into the army. In June 1969 Nixon announced the first of the US troop withdrawals. The 540,000 US troops were to be reduced by 25,000. Another 60,000 were to leave the following December. In January 1973 the US, the two Vietnams and the Vietcong agreed a ceasefire and the last US troops were withdrawn in March. In conclusion the US withdrew from Vietnam for political reasons. Public opinion turned against the war when it became clear that both the casualties and the cost of the war were rising and that the US could not win the war. Nixon knew that the only way he could secure a second term in office was to end US involvement in the war. He tried to do this through the process of Vietnamisation but ultimately he wanted the troops out by any means. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. The Arab-Israeli conflict 1956, 1967 and 1973.

    in the two previous wars and so they were more than prepared for these types of surprise attacks. Due to the fact that it was a holiday, meant that most of the soldiers were at home and quickly contacted to report for duty.

  2. Explain why the US withdrew its forces from Vietnam in 1973?

    So, in an attempt to overcome the problem of the terrain providing so much cover for the enemy troops, the Americans decided that they would reluctantly need to use their air superiority, which they were concerned about using as they didn't want to be portrayed as aggressors, who mindlessly destroyed the "innocent" Vietnamese farmers' livelihoods.

  1. American History.

    could regulate colonial trade but not use that power to raise revenue. - The Massachusetts Assembly called for unity in the face of the Acts and circulated a joint petition of protest, which the ministry ordered them to recall, giving the other assemblies the incentive to join forces against it.

  2. How useful are sources A to C to explain why the United States became ...

    This makes the source less useful, as no information can be gathered about these reasons. Sources A, B and C are all useful to some extent. Source A gives the official reasons for America getting involved in Vietnam, that Johnson wants the public to hear and Source B and C give the unofficial reasons.

  1. Armed forces.

    It wouldn't take colonial administrators long to see the benefits that such an infrastructure could bring to the colonies they were in charge of. Particularly, as some of these colonies could be immense in size and with little existing infrastructure.

  2. To What Extent Have The Attempts For A Palestinian State Been Blocked By The ...

    Closures and Sieges is equally as pivotal in maintaining the Palestinian issue as merely a 'humanitarian issue'. What these methods entail is the sealing off of the occupied Territories to movement into Israel, and also sealing off areas within the territories to movement between one another, via an 'extensive system of roadblocks, curfews and checkpoints'.

  1. Truman - Guilty or Innocent

    The new organisation formed in April 1949 became known as NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organisation), primarily because all member countries were situated around the North Atlantic Ocean. Stalin saw this as a severe threat and as a result set up a communist counterpart of NATO, The Warsaw Pact.

  2. Explain why the United States withdrew its forces from Vietnam in 1973

    The country was partitioned into separate states, North and South Vietnam. The USA saw South Vietnam as another "domino." The Secretary of State, John Dulles, was anti-communist and stated that if areas in South East Asia were taken over by Communists, then places like Malaya and Thailand would easily fall.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work