• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain Why The USA Withdrem its Forces From Vietnam in 1973

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Explain Why the United States withdrew its forces from Vietnam in 1973? America became involved in the Vietnam conflict because of their fear involving the spread of communism. By helping the South Vietnamese resist the communist North the US government believed they could prevent the spread of Communism throughout Asia and eventually the world. This was called the 'Domino Theory'. America believed they could easily defeat North Vietnam; "We should declare war on North Vietnam. . . .We could pave the whole country and put parking strips on it, and still be home by Christmas." Ronald Reagan 1965 Factors contributing to the withdrawal of the US troops from Vietnam include; the differing military tactics of the two sides, media influences, civilian reaction and Nixon's policy of 'Vietnamisation'. The US withdrew their forces from Vietnam in 1973 because President Nixon had promised the protesting Americans, that his government would bring it to an end with "the right kind of peace, a peace that would last". An important long term cause leading to the withdrawal of US troops was the conflicting military tactics of the two sides. ...read more.

Middle

Napalm stuck to the skin and caused horrific burns. The morale of US troops worsened as they saw the devastating effects. This led to public outrage and US citizens began to question the war. The effects of the chemicals on US troops created resentment and hence led to their withdrawal. They were no longer fighting to resist communism but to kill. The cost of fighting the war totalled $168.1 billion, with the eventual cost estimated at $600 billion. For each Vietcong member killed, it cost $400,000. Tax money was being wasted on a worthless cause. Support began to fall and protests for the removal of troops developed by 1967. For example, 3,000 students gathered at a college to protest about the war, ending with 4 non-protesters being shot dead. The rising numbers of US casualties was also concerning. By 1967, 160 soldiers were killed a week. The death tally, ludicrous cost of the war and brutal tactics made US troops question why they were fighting war. This led to another long term decisive factor which was to play an integral part in the withdrawal of US troops - the media. ...read more.

Conclusion

Help was promised if this did happen. Written in January 1973, in a letter to president Thieu, Nixon claimed "You have my assurance that we will respond with full force should the settlement be violated by North Vietnam." However, when the war resumed only supplies were sent. Within a year Saigon fell and by 1976 North and South Vietnam became a single communist country under the rule of Ho Chi Minh. The American policy of containment had failed. The conflicting military tactics of the two sides was the most important cause for the withdrawal of US forces. If there been a series of pitched battles, the war would have been won by the US within months. However, the Vietcong's successful use of Guerrilla warfare prevented this. Their use of the Jungle was too great for the US soldiers to defend against as it was unfamiliar terrain and the Vietcong used this advantage effectively. Frustration was building up for US troops because the lack of support from the South Vietnamese, who they were fighting for, allowed the Vietcong to hide amongst the villagers undetected. This frustration culminated in atrocities and massacres by some US troops which was broadcasted all over the world causing great embarrassment for America. Ultimately, the poor US tactics led to the withdrawal of their forces in 1973. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. To what extent can it be argued that the use of guerilla warfare tactics ...

    It also needs to be linked to the overall question you are addressing - namely, establishing the main reason why they lost. You need a signposting sentence here to provide a smooth link between paragraphs. In a war in which the average age of troops is 19, a great level of inexperience is to be expected.

  2. The Arab-Israeli conflict 1956, 1967 and 1973.

    and weaken and destroy Nasser. Therefore, in order to achieve all these aims, Britain and France teamed up with Israel in secret and decided on a military invasion on Egypt. France also agreed to provide Israel with arms and all the military equipment needed for the invasion.

  1. Describe the military tactics and weapons used by both the USA and the Vietcong ...

    There was a rear-sight shaped like a 'V', and a foresight blade at the end. This meant that you could use both eyes when shooting and didn't have to be as accurate; making it ideal again for the VC and Guerilla fighting.

  2. Explain why the US withdrew its forces from Vietnam in 1973?

    free love, drug use and no violence, began to show their protesting roots and rallied for demonstrations against the war. Many soldiers too were turning to drugs to heal the dismay of being part of such a dreadful war and, when these pictures were relayed back to America, people took

  1. To what extent can it be argued that the use of guerilla warfare tactics ...

    The VC would always try and avoid conventional battles with US troops; rather they favoured picking off stragglers or as mentioned before springing surprise attacks and then disappearing. The troops could not see their enemy and could therefore not use their weapons to destroy them.

  2. Was the My Lai Massacre a failure in the Rules of Engagement or a ...

    They decided to prosecute twenty-five people, from officers to enlisted men, including General Koster, Colonel Oran Henderson, and Captain Medina. Medina who had to take a polygraph test told the truth when he said that he didn't tell his soldiers to kill the innocent people of My Lai.

  1. American History.

    into the south and west in the 1670s [wanted to gain direct control over the fur trade]. This brought them into conflict w/the Iroquois Confederacy, which had had skirmished w/the Europeans over the fur trade [the Beaver Wars] as early as 1633.

  2. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    The Tiger barracks at Amchit were captured after holding out for most of the day. The 'Day of Long Knives' as it became to be called claimed around 200 lives around half of which were civilians who had been caught during indiscriminate shooting.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work