• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain why there was an anti-war movement in the united states during the late 1960 - source based work.

Extracts from this document...


IS THERE SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE IN SOURCES 'A' TO 'E' TO EXPLAIN WHY THERE WAS AN ANTI-WAR MOVEMENT IN THE UNITED STATES DURING THE LATE 1960s AND EARLY 1970s? Source 'A' shows that people were sent off to war against their own will as they would not have usually been let into the army as they scored so low on intelligence tests. This is a reason for people to oppose this war as these people who are being drafted are being forced to do something against their own will and are risking their lives in the process. It also says that a lot of men had died, especially in the first few months. They were not given proper training and so were more likely to die or become a casualty. People were wondering if Vietnam was worth dying for and whether it mattered if communism spread through Asia. ...read more.


It seems as if they are just trying to stop communism from spreading past Vietnam and not to it. This bad treatment to innocent people would upset the American public and encourage them to support the peace movement. I know that the US did treat innocent civilians harshly and that they also tried to cover incidents up by lying. This is because the government papers known as the Pentagon Papers were stolen and publicised. They show that the US did not always act correctly. Source 'C' backs up source 'B' in the way of attacking/killing innocent civilians. It shows how it is immoral and not the way to persuade the people of the evil of communism. The bombing of civilians gave people a reason to protest against war, as war was obviously not the way to achieve the aims of the US. ...read more.


Source 'E' says how the media, especially television portrays the war as being more gruesome than it really is. This would show why there was so much protesting as they had been unknowingly mislead into what the war was really like. I think that the sources do give some good reasons and motives for the public of the US to protest against the war, but some aspects are not mentioned. These include the unfair executions and torturing of men without trial, and that some of the chemical weapons used by the US were harmful to the environment, as scientists discovered. Also, these sources do not show what the secretary of defence, Robert McNamara, said about the bombing of North Vietnam and how it was not helping, as this drove many people to the protests. They believed that if the main politician, the expert, agrees that the bombing should be stopped, then it must be. After all, he was the secretary of defence for seven years. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. I will be looking at how the U.S became increasingly involved Vietnam, the problems ...

    This is because they are watching in their very own living rooms the same horrors the soldiers are seeing. For the first time in history anyone from grandmothers to toddlers were able to view people dieing and screaming in pain.

  2. The Vietnam War - anti-war movement source based questions

    He states that the media "over exaggerated the extent of the protest" and claims that most student campuses were fairly quiet- most of the time. His views lean towards the right wing. It is a secondary source and Garfinkle could have access to a wide variety of primary sources in order to help him for his conclusions.

  1. Hiroshima Coursework This piece of coursework will concentrate on three questions, all source based.

    So the sources intended audience is people who hate the USA, i.e. the Japanese and the USSR. The narrator of this source has the advantage of hindsight but his motives have to be questioned. He would not be able to tell his true feelings because of the situation between the two countries.

  2. Does Source C show that the anti-war protests described in Source A had an ...

    Source H is a drawing from an American children's book showing US troops landing in Vietnam. This is a secondary piece of evidence and an artist's inaccurate representation. This could be biased as it is drawn by an American and due to the fact it is from a children's book it may be simplified or the truth could be censored.

  1. How Useful are Sources A to C to Explain Why the United States Became ...

    Source D is media, as it is a poster, but the poster is showing military tactics and how the Viet Cong were very hard to defeat. Source D propaganda, as it is a Vietnamese poster and is likely to help persuade Vietnamese people to join the war.

  2. How useful are sources A to C to explain why the United States became ...

    His political tendencies toward socialism and anarchism are a result of what he calls "the radical Jewish community in New York." Since 1965 he has become one of the leading critics of U.S. foreign policy. He published a book of essays called American Power and the New Mandarins, which is

  1. Is there sufficient evidence in sources A to F to explain why there was ...

    to why there was an anti-war movement are direct courses of the war, because they only came about during the Vietnam War. The sources A-F, do not explain all the reasons to why there was and anti-war movement, but they do help us to understand a few of the reasons

  2. Vietnam peace movement

    At first, only a few protests took place, mostly made up of college students. Anti war protests really took off in 1965 when conscription was introduced. People attempted to put off conscription by faking illness, going away or marrying but really it boiled down to one thing.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work