• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain why there was such different reactions in the USA to the country's involvement in the conflict in Vietnam in the 1960's.

Extracts from this document...


Explain why there was such different reactions in the USA to the country's involvement in the conflict in Vietnam in the 1960's The opinions on the Vietnam War were split from start to finish. Many people believed it was the right thing to do and were right behind all the government officials who supported the war, but many people strongly disagreed with the war and were read and free to voice their opinions in America. In the start however most of the country backed the war. America seemed to believe they were the world's policeman. Most Americans believed it was their patriotic duty to go to war. Not only did they think the country should go to war they thought that it would be over in a short time. With the country never having lost a war the American public had every right to feel confident and with limitless power had no reason to think that it would be a long war. The Americans had been forced to believe Communism was a bad thing, so another view of the American public was that they were afraid of the spread of communism and the 'Domino Theory'. Buddhist monks all over America and anywhere in the south-east were protesting in very strange fashion by burning themselves. They hoped to make people see how desperate they were for the war not to go ahead. ...read more.


Hippies were obviously against the war. They offered a different opinion to everyone else. Freedom, peace and love did not involve war surprisingly enough and the hippies were strongly against the war. Sit-ins and marches were held to protest but the hippies could not have a strong point due to the governments spin on their drug use. Lots and lots of women were against the war because they were the wives of the soldiers. When they saw what was really happening due to media coverage they wanted the war to be stopped and their husbands back. In the early sixties however despite all these groups opposing the war there was an overwhelming support for going to war. The public opinion quickly changed though in 1968 after the Tet Offensive. This was where the Vietnamese celebrated their national holiday a day early and then attacked American soldiers on the day of the holiday. This was a suprise attack and the US lost many soldiers in this attack. This humiliated the American government and they had now lost all credibility. The soldiers no longer trusted their leaders who told the Americans they were winning the war. Also back in America the public had lost all confidence in the government. Members of the government resigned saying America could no longer win the war and that morale was already at its lowest. ...read more.


The public opinion rocketed against the war due to disbelief of what their soldiers were doing. America was now not only unpopular in their own country they were unpopular all over the world. The hippies were becoming more widespread and had more of a voice towards the end of the 1960's because more people wanted to listen to them now. They were not getting confidence from the government so they had to get it for more unlikely sources. They held more protests, the most memorable outside the American embassy. Vietnam was also very expensive. the mass weapons and defoliants were not cheap to produce and they were being used frequently. People had to pay higher taxes, this made the government more unpopular and less people trusted them. Overall I don't believe all this affected the public opinion that much. In 1971 an opinion poll was held. They asked members of the public if they thought it was right to go into Vietnam. More people believed it was wrong but there was still a majority in favour of going to war. The final results were 60% in favour to 40% against it. This was a massive rise but still did not affect anything. Therefore overall I believe that the public opinion change was important but was not as important as it perhaps first seemed. I can understand why the American public were upset and could not trust the government but i believe the government was right to go into war. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Why was there a Sino-Soviet split by the late 1960s?

    These clashes were continual and never-ending, China wanted what the USSR was keen to avoid, and the USSR wanted what China saw as a personal attempt to thwart their ambitions, and consequently relations deteriorated. Mutual interests, it appeared, were confined to their shared 'ideology', a loosely employed term because as discussed previously, communism took on different meanings for different countries.

  2. Free essay

    Why did the USA become involved in Vietnam in the 1950's and 1960's

    We know how this aid did not work because the peasants did not want to be removed from their land. We know why this aid did not work because none of the policies applied to Vietnam's citizens (who were mainly peasant).

  1. Why Did the USA become involved in Vietnam in the 1950s and 1960s

    they had over 1 thousand bottles of wine and 8 prostitutes, so they really weren't up to fighting. Therefore Giap had taken over this valley of "Dien Bien Phu"; the French knew that the war was lost. I believe that the USA had been involved in this Vietnam War because

  2. How did the poets and the songwriters of the 1960's react to the Vietnam ...

    to go' They spent ten years and billions of dollars and achieved 'notta thing' to quote an American serviceman returning back to the USA from Vietnam. He has nowhere to go and the, USA has nowhere to go; they can only go lower and lower.

  1. Explain why there were such different reactions in theUSA to the country's involvement in ...

    to war, the only people let to fight were the poor and black people. Initially, young men were eager to join the army. They wanted to go and fight in Vietnam as they saw it as a chance to be heroes and fight

  2. In what ways was the Pacific war a racist conflict?

    The overwhelming image of the Japanese that the film created was that of, in the films own words, "an obedient mass with but a single mind". Everything in the film showed the Japanese to be regimented and ordered, and the films commentary went on to describe how this showed the

  1. IsThere Sufficient Evidence In Sources a-E To Explain Why There Was an Anti-WarMovement In ...

    The public would be outraged at the human cost for the war, and the terrible conditions, which their soldiers were thrown into, without enough training. This ultimately turned the people against the war, creating anti-war views and eventually to an anti-war movement.

  2. Explain why there were such different reactions in the USA to the country's involvement ...

    Huge protests brought together the various direct-action movements. Some protests became violent. Some protestors were even shot dead with live ammunition by US troops.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work