• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain why there were such different reactions in the USA to the country’s involvement in the conflict in Vietnam in the 1960’s.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

David Gray Vietnam Coursework: Task 3 Explain why there were such different reactions in the USA to the country's involvement in the conflict in Vietnam in the 1960's. In 1960 the US sent increasing amounts of money, military equipment and advisors to South Vietnam. At this time the US perceived it could play a role in supporting democracy in South Vietnam, against the fear of invasion from the communist North. When the war in Vietnam started only a small percentage of the American population opposed the war. Those who initially objected to the involvement in Vietnam fell into three main categories; people who had left wing political views who wanted an NLF victory; pacifists who opposed all wars; and liberals who believed that the best way of stopping the spread of communism was by encouraging democratic rather than authoritarian governments. (Simpkin, Vietnam War). Following success in Korea, patriotic Americans, who had never lost a war largely, supported government policy. Indeed, a 1964 opinion poll showed that 85% of Americans approved of...the war policy. By 1969, fewer than 50% of the population were opposed to anti-war protests. (Smith, The USA 1917-1980) Since the early 1950's, the US had increasingly become involved in the affairs of South East Asia. President's Eisenhower and Kennedy supported the Domino Theory, fearing that if Vietnam fell to communism, neighbouring countries, which had important trade links with the US, would also fall. ...read more.

Middle

He also criticised the government for 'taking young black men who had been crippled by our society...to guarantee liberties in South East Asia which they had not found in South West Georgia or East Harlem...Negro and white boys...killed together for a nation that has been unable to seat them together in the same schools.' Until the mid 1960's, critics of American policy in Vietnam had been few and even these were discounted as being liberal, disloyal pro-communists. The growing influence of the number of US casualties, the horror of the war relayed each evening on colour televisions in homes nationwide, the draining of funds from Johnson's 'Great Society' programme and the racial overtones of the war made the anti-war movement 'respectable' and one that Washington could not ignore (Harriet Ward, World Powers in the 20th Century) the Revolt of the American Establishment, the University presidents, the Lawyers, the bankers, the corporation heads, who are the articulate elite of 'middle America'. Senators J. William Fulbright and Robert Kennedy, foreign policy experts George Kennan and Walter Lippmann, Dr. Benjamin Spock and Dr. Martin Luther King JR. encouraged hundreds of thousands of Americans to participate in antiwar marches and demonstrations to Washington in 1967 (J.McLeary, Modern World History). By the spring of 1968 they were convinced that victory in Vietnam was not worth the immense social cost (300 Americans dead a week) and the immense financial drain ($30,000million a year)(Alistair Buchan, The Observer). ...read more.

Conclusion

By now the American at large, not just students, deserters and draft dodgers were becoming disenchanted by the war. Congress had ignored its constitutional duties throughout the Vietnam War, legislating merely on domestic matters. The President had formulated foreign policy. Once public opinion became markedly anti-war, Congress began to assume its authority, declaring that no funds appropriated for military purposes could be used to widen the war, expressly forbidding the use of ground troops in Laos and Cambodia. Te war had polarised and even the middle ground of ordinary Americans had reached the conclusion that winning the war was impossible. President Johnson's promise of a 'Great Society' was vanishing. The money needed for social justice had been spent on the Vietnam War and angry black Americans and college-aged youth turned to violence to hasten social change. LBJ faced 1968, the election year, in disarray. Violent protests in many black ghettos in US cities led many to believe that troops would be needed to stop revolution in the US. In 1970, universities in America exploded as President Nixon extended the war by attacking Cambodia. At Kent State University, the National Guardsman fired a volley of shots that killed four students and wounded nine others. The protests against the student deaths spread to other universities and two more students were killed, shot by the Police. This was the final catalyst in turning public opinion against the war in Vietnam. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. What can you learn from Source A about the reasons for US involvement in ...

    Source H is from a letter written home by an America soldier. In the letter, the situation in Vietnam is described as bleak and tragic. The soldier emphasises that he is "sick to death of it", referring to the situation in Vietnam.

  2. Forrest Gump; the Modern Day Fairytale

    they don't want to confront their own emotions, let alone explain them to a child. "Mamma always says..." The other woman in Forrests life; Jenny is not an apparent icon and seemingly not a good role model with the rocky route she chose in life.

  1. American History.

    not give a crap about Indian traditions and culture. - So, due to the factors listed above, it was exceedingly difficult for the two groups to maintain the harmonious relationship they had developed at the beginning. Before long, the settlers began to follow a pattern that would occur time and again: they took advantage of their allies, then turned against them (using their internal politics to divide and conquer)

  2. The Role and Importance of the Media in Vietnam

    However, as I mentioned before, neither the television nor the written press were able to offer the American public battles they could identify with, a sense of purpose to the struggle. In the protracted war the VC were fighting, all television could present was a series of "continuous and seemingly

  1. The role of partisan politics in the spread of McCarthyism

    13 Although Truman called the bill "the greatest danger to freedom of speech, press, and assembly" 14, the Democratic Congress overrode his veto in order to pass the bill. 15 Part C: Evaluation of Sources The two sources investigated in this section will be McCarthyism, edited by Thomas C.

  2. 'To what extent had the USA become two different societies by the eve of ...

    the north was still reliant on the agricultural sector of the economy and the poplar view of the north as an urban society, rather than an agricultural society during the civil war, is therefore misguided. As the north was still a predominantly rural society before the civil war, and was

  1. Select and explain the most important turning points in Senator Joe McCarthy's political career

    However the policeman witness who saw him on the 2nd floor said he was totally cool and collected, and not out of breath at all. They claimed that he shot through tree foliage, even though it would have made more sense to shoot the President on Houston Street, it would

  2. US involvement in South Vietnam - source related study

    It states that when the men had already been made to believe they were desperately needed, they discovered that there was nothing for them to do out there. It also contradicts source A because J.F.K states in source A that the Americans were out in Vietnam to stop the spread

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work