• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain why there were such different reactions in the USA to the country’s involvement in the conflict in Vietnam in the 1960’s.

Extracts from this document...


David Gray Vietnam Coursework: Task 3 Explain why there were such different reactions in the USA to the country's involvement in the conflict in Vietnam in the 1960's. In 1960 the US sent increasing amounts of money, military equipment and advisors to South Vietnam. At this time the US perceived it could play a role in supporting democracy in South Vietnam, against the fear of invasion from the communist North. When the war in Vietnam started only a small percentage of the American population opposed the war. Those who initially objected to the involvement in Vietnam fell into three main categories; people who had left wing political views who wanted an NLF victory; pacifists who opposed all wars; and liberals who believed that the best way of stopping the spread of communism was by encouraging democratic rather than authoritarian governments. (Simpkin, Vietnam War). Following success in Korea, patriotic Americans, who had never lost a war largely, supported government policy. Indeed, a 1964 opinion poll showed that 85% of Americans approved of...the war policy. By 1969, fewer than 50% of the population were opposed to anti-war protests. (Smith, The USA 1917-1980) Since the early 1950's, the US had increasingly become involved in the affairs of South East Asia. President's Eisenhower and Kennedy supported the Domino Theory, fearing that if Vietnam fell to communism, neighbouring countries, which had important trade links with the US, would also fall. ...read more.


He also criticised the government for 'taking young black men who had been crippled by our society...to guarantee liberties in South East Asia which they had not found in South West Georgia or East Harlem...Negro and white boys...killed together for a nation that has been unable to seat them together in the same schools.' Until the mid 1960's, critics of American policy in Vietnam had been few and even these were discounted as being liberal, disloyal pro-communists. The growing influence of the number of US casualties, the horror of the war relayed each evening on colour televisions in homes nationwide, the draining of funds from Johnson's 'Great Society' programme and the racial overtones of the war made the anti-war movement 'respectable' and one that Washington could not ignore (Harriet Ward, World Powers in the 20th Century) the Revolt of the American Establishment, the University presidents, the Lawyers, the bankers, the corporation heads, who are the articulate elite of 'middle America'. Senators J. William Fulbright and Robert Kennedy, foreign policy experts George Kennan and Walter Lippmann, Dr. Benjamin Spock and Dr. Martin Luther King JR. encouraged hundreds of thousands of Americans to participate in antiwar marches and demonstrations to Washington in 1967 (J.McLeary, Modern World History). By the spring of 1968 they were convinced that victory in Vietnam was not worth the immense social cost (300 Americans dead a week) and the immense financial drain ($30,000million a year)(Alistair Buchan, The Observer). ...read more.


By now the American at large, not just students, deserters and draft dodgers were becoming disenchanted by the war. Congress had ignored its constitutional duties throughout the Vietnam War, legislating merely on domestic matters. The President had formulated foreign policy. Once public opinion became markedly anti-war, Congress began to assume its authority, declaring that no funds appropriated for military purposes could be used to widen the war, expressly forbidding the use of ground troops in Laos and Cambodia. Te war had polarised and even the middle ground of ordinary Americans had reached the conclusion that winning the war was impossible. President Johnson's promise of a 'Great Society' was vanishing. The money needed for social justice had been spent on the Vietnam War and angry black Americans and college-aged youth turned to violence to hasten social change. LBJ faced 1968, the election year, in disarray. Violent protests in many black ghettos in US cities led many to believe that troops would be needed to stop revolution in the US. In 1970, universities in America exploded as President Nixon extended the war by attacking Cambodia. At Kent State University, the National Guardsman fired a volley of shots that killed four students and wounded nine others. The protests against the student deaths spread to other universities and two more students were killed, shot by the Police. This was the final catalyst in turning public opinion against the war in Vietnam. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. What can you learn from Source A about the reasons for US involvement in ...

    Some plans for the USA had to be scrapped so that funds could be redirected to the Vietnam war, and this left many people feeling rather bitter towards the government, and questioning the government's reasoning for the war. Other reasons were the demonstrations that were held, protesting against the war, and the government.

  2. America In Vietnam, 1953-73

    A Pentagon analyst, Daniel Ellsberg leaked these top secret government documents on the Vietnam War which represented two years of research by the Pentagon and exposed the lies about the war and the complete lack of any plan to win in Vietnam.

  1. Forrest Gump; the Modern Day Fairytale

    Forrests starts his run to try and clear his raging whirlpool of tumultuous emotions, he impulsively puts on his Bubba- Gump hat and starts running and doesn't stop for along time! As the months passed by we see Forrest age until he becomes almost unrecognizable, his hair becomes a tangled

  2. American History.

    Another problem was conceptions of property ownership. For the Indians, land? was communal and couldn't be bought/sold. Also, the English thought land ownership implied it was farmed. Most significantly, the English had a big time superiority complex, and did? not give a crap about Indian traditions and culture.

  1. The role of partisan politics in the spread of McCarthyism

    Reeves, a professor and Senior Fellow of the Wisconsin Policy Research Institute. The purpose of this collection is to allow for the different points of view concerning McCarthyism 'in the hope that students will be less inclined to select the "right one" than to think about and discuss the varied

  2. The War on television screens in American living rooms has made Americans far more ...

    US political establishment, the military's chain of command, and an already divided American public. Camera footage was recorded and sent home and this was distressing for them. They realised what they had got themselves into and the scenes captured were made more horrific by the colour television.

  1. "The war on colour television screens in American living rooms had made Americans far ...

    Some of the sources show that TV was not the reason America lost the war though does show the importance of the media. Source D is a North Vietnamese poster showing that the American troops unable to find the Vietcong.

  2. Why did the USA send combat troops to Vietnam in 1965?

    The South Vietnamese people did not support the government entirely because; Diem decided to support the landlords against the peasants, which were the majority of the population. People saw Diem as being a puppet of America they did not like this as it meant they were not independent like the North.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work