• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11

Government efforts in Southeast Asia to create harmonious multicultural societies ultimately proved futile. How far do you agree?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

In the second half of the 20th century, newly independent Southeast Asian states faced many challenges that saw different approaches adopted, with varying degrees of success in the various countries. Economic and political challenges were often the most crucial to the survival to these nascent nations, yet an equally important challenge was that of creating a harmonious society. In light of the diversity of cultures within each of these nations, government efforts to create harmony were often plagued with many problems, so I do agree to some extent that these efforts ultimately proved futile. However, there has been some success, especially in countries such as Singapore and Malaysia. To a large extent, the various policies implemented to try to achieve harmonious multicultural societies failed miserably in countries such as Myanmar, but were more successful in countries such as Singapore. The policies can come under two main theme, "unity in diversity" and "cultural nationalism". "Unity in diversity" basically espouses the idea that the state should try to accommodate the needs of the ethnic minorities, so as to make them feel included into the society. Policies under this theme included the adoption of national ideologies aimed at making the citizens have a common identity and the inclusion of articles in the various constitutions that made provisions for guaranteeing the rights of the minorities "Cultural nationalism", on the other hand, seeks to assert the dominant culture onto the minorities, and expect them to assimilate into society. ...read more.

Middle

Even in Singapore, where the government has successfully created a harmonious society, there have been some minor sources of tension. For example, the launch of the "Speak Mandarin Campaign" and Special Assistance Programme schools were aimed at making Chinese Singaporeans more rooted to their culture, but this aroused fears of Chinese chauvinism. Another example would be the disadvantage that many ethnic minorities face in seeking employments because of the many employers that require employees to speak Mandarin. The tension generated by these issues can be said to affect the harmony of Singapore's society, albeit to a very small extent. Despite the many failures, however, to say that the governments' efforts to create harmonious societies have failed would be grossly misrepresenting the results of government efforts. After all, the territorial integrity of the various Southeast Asian states have been maintained, apart from the independence of Timor Leste from Indonesia. In countries like Malaysia, Singapore and Indonesia, a significant level of harmony has been achieved over the years, even if this harmony is only on the surface, as in the case of Indonesia, between the Javanese Malays and the Chinese. Even in Myanmar, some degree of stability has been achieved because of the ceasefires signed between the military government and the ethnic minorities. In present-day Myanmar, there is little harmony to speak about between the military government, which is largely influenced by the Burman majority, and the ethnic minorities. ...read more.

Conclusion

This was not helped by the move to centralise governance in the Burman-populated territories, as ethnic minorities feared that they would lose their autonomy. Hence, it can be said that the military governments failed to make concerted efforts to achieve harmony in the Burmese society, and so it was not that policies implemented failed, but that policies implemented failed to consider the interests of the ethnic minorities in the first place. A similar situation can be seen in Indonesia, although to a smaller extent. The discriminatory policies by the government against the Chinese minority perpetuated the resentment of the Javanese majority against the economic domination by the Chinese, and this inevitably led to the anti-Chinese riots in 1998. This shows that the lack of genuine harmony between the various racial groups could be attributed to some degree to the policies of the government. In conclusion, it can be said that the efforts by Southeast Asian governments to create harmonious societies were largely successful, especially in countries like Singapore and Malaysia where no major racial riots have broken out over the past few decades. Even in Indonesia and Myanmar, there is some degree of stability, though much of the problem lies in the lack of sincerity by the government's part in implementing policies. "Government efforts in Southeast Asia to create harmonious multicultural societies ultimately proved futile." How far do you agree? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Why Does the Chinese Government At the Start of the 21st Century Refuse To ...

    It resulted in Europeans being captured and killed. The European response was just as brutal. They sent in armies to loot Beijing and the Boxers were executed in the streets. In 1911 there was another rebellion. The focus of this rebellion was to overthrow the weak Manchu dynasty.

  2. Free essay

    Critically examine the factors which accelerated the decolonisation process in Southeast Asia.

    longer willing to be used as a pawn in the conflicts between empires. Furthermore, due to the thoroughly politicised masses during wartime, the nationalists movements proved too strong to be willing to accept the re-imposition of colonial rule, which speeded up the decolonisation process.

  1. MEDIA, CULTURE AND SOCIETY

    School of Journalism. In attendance was Hans Blix, the former chief U.N. weapons inspector, Joseph Wilson, former U.S. ambassador to Iraq and a host of senior journalists and editors from the U.S. and abroad. The intension of this conference was not clear, but due to the lack of finding chemical

  2. Introduction - US policy to Southeast Asia in general

    To Abouzahr, The French could not have maintained the war without it - therefore French post-war recovery was further hindered, with American money being used in Indochina rather than for the recovery projects it was intended for. Indochina became a difficult contradiction in American foreign policy.

  1. American History.

    In the end the passage of the Assumption Bill was exchanged in a series of compromises for the location of the capital [on the Potomac]. The Bank of the United States - soon Hamilton submitted another report on? recommending the chartering of a nat'l bank that would be capitalized at $10 million and would mainly be funded by private investors.

  2. Khrushchev's attempts at modernisation.

    A significant reason why Khrushchev did not achieve more was that he was not a planner. Instead he was a man who imperfectly thought out bright ideas! His Virgin Lands scheme was not well thought through. Too often crops were planted on lands with an unsuitable soil or a harsh climate leading to disastrous crop failures.

  1. Superpower Relations 1945-90

    * 1,400 flights occurred on one day. * 79 American British and Germans died in accidents. * The Airlift cost $100,000,000. In May 1949, Stalin called off the blockade. Why did Stalin's blockade fail? Stalin seriously underestimated the determination of the Western Allies to resist Soviet pressure.

  2. Why does the Chinese government at the start of the twenty first century refuse ...

    In 1912, Yuan Shikai became president of China, but in 1913 when Sun Yatsen's People's National Party or Kuomintang (KMT) became won the largest amounts of seats in the National Assembly, Yuan failed to co-operate and was not interested in sharing power.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work