• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The cult of Stalin and the purges of the 1930(TM)s were two aspects of Stalin(TM)s determination to retain supreme power. How far do you agree with this opinion?

Extracts from this document...


"The cult of Stalin and the purges of the 1930's were two aspects of Stalin's determination to retain supreme power". How far do you agree with this opinion? There is little doubt that Joseph Stalin made drastic and continual efforts to retain his supreme power during the 1930's. The two main methods and perhaps the most memorable are 'the great purges' (otherwise known as the 'great terror') and 'the cult of Stalin'. Although Stalin had been triumphant in the 'power struggle' against Leon Trotsky in 1929, rather than alleviating his insecurities, Stalin became increasingly paranoid. It seems that the more power and control he gained over Russia and its people, the more irrational and mistrustful he became. This was more than likely because he had more to lose and this encouraged him to instigate a more brutal and controlling regime. Other examples of his vindictive rule were the purging of kulaks during collectivisation and the excessive demands he made during industrialisation and the five-year plans. He also conducted purges targeted at Bolshevik opposition. He insisted on members reapplying for their membership to the party using excuses like corruption, drunkenness and being politically inactive to dismiss them, thus frightening members into submission. This was because if they lost their party cards they could lose their jobs, which ultimately meant they lost their homes, their privileged rations and public status. At the time, Stalin was the General Secretary and consequently controlled whose memberships were renewed and as a result any member suspected of betrayal or opposing his policies had their membership revoked. ...read more.


Everyone was a potential victim during this phase of the purges. The NKVD massacred kulaks, priests, former members of anti-Bolshevik armies, those who had been abroad or had relatives abroad, immigrants and even citizens.[8] The second show trial was held in January 1937, in which seventeen people stood accused, among them were Karl Radek, Yuri Piatakov and Grigory Sokolnikov. Thirteen of the defendants were executed, while the remainder were sent to the Gulags. The third show trial, held in March 1938, involved 21 defendants allegedly belonging to the "Bloc of Rightists and Trotskyites", whose leaders consisted of Nikolai Bukharin, Alexei Rykov, Genrikh Yagoda (former Head of the NKVD), Christian Rakovsky and Nikolai Krestinsky, all of whom were executed. The third phase of the great purges began in the spring of 1937 and was led by the NKVD which targeted the armed forces. Previously, many of the Red Army officers had been officers under the Tsarist regime and during Lenin's rule had been forged into the Red Army by Trotsky, causing Stalin to fear that they would turn against him and form a military dictatorship as an alternative government to his style of communism. Officers were by now living in fear of World War II breaking out and because they had earned their ranks on merit and had not bought them, they did not feel they owed Stalin any loyalty, increasing his fear of a military coup. ...read more.


As a result Stalin commanded Lavrenti Beria, the new Head of the NKVD, to purge the Communist Party of candidates for his leadership. However, on 2nd March Stalin suffered a brain haemorrhage resulting in the plan being terminated.[12] To this day, events surrounding his death have been shrouded with enigma as it has been claimed that the night before the haemorrhage, his guards were given orders, from Stalin himself, to retire for the night and not to disturb him. When he did not rise the next day at his usual time, the guards became concerned but did not interrupt him as they feared the repercussions of disobeying the dictator. That evening one of the guards was ordered to enter Stalin's room to investigate and on entry he found Stalin lying on the floor, paralysed, soon after he slipped into a coma. The guard summoned the senior party men of the Politburo and family members to the 'Dacha', Stalin's favourite holiday home. His daughter, Svetlana Alliluyeva's testimony claims that after 3 days (5th March 1953) Stalin briefly regained consciousness, looked around the room, raised his hand and pointed upwards as if "bringing down a curse upon us all" and then he died.[13] Conversely, due to the tardiness of the Politburo in calling for medical assistance, the Russian historian Edvard Radzinski asserts that Stalin was injected with poison by the guard Khrustalev, under the orders of his master (KGB chief, Lavrenty Beria to prevent Russia participating in the initiation of World War III.[14] In the end it was Stalin's own paranoia and tyranny that led to his demise. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. Lenins Economic Policies lacked consistency in the period 1918-1924. How far would you ...

    This led to the introduction of the NEP. The basic idea was to create an economy with a public, or state controlled, and a private section, which operated on the basis of supply and demand. The NEP saw the end to grain requisitioning. It was replaced by a tax in kind system.

  2. Robespierre fell when the Terror had outlived its usefulness- How far do you agree ...

    Austria who had previously threatened to invade France, had been pushed back by French forces and was not a threat to France for the time being. The value of the assignat was rising by 1793, stabilising France's finances, Food supplies to major cities and towns had been stabilised by the

  1. To what extent was Napoleon a Dictator

    laws they had in different regions into one set of laws, mainly based on Roman law. However again it was illiberal. When we think of a dictatorship, we normally connote the ideas of repression, and this is exactly what is seen.

  2. How Important Were The Policies Of Gorbachev In Bringing An End To The Cold ...

    The Cold War issues were gone. Although, there was some opposition, mainly from Conservative members of the Communist Party and many of the Soviet armed forces who opposed the dismantling of Communism within the Soviet Union. However, their coups against Gorbachev failed, and by December 1991, the remaining republics dissolved the Soviet Union, the Cold War was now officially over.

  1. A direct comparison of the role of central power and control during the late ...

    era of repression was just a continuation of foundations laid down by the Tsars. 'The Tsarist regime was based on absolutism, which allowed for repression as a series of corrective and regulatory measures - as a necessary evil to prevent a greater evil.'6 When this is compared the Soviet leaders,

  2. The First English Civil War

    While the Earl of Manchester (with Cromwell as his lieutenant-general) was appointed to head the forces of the Eastern Association against Newcastle, and Waller was given a new army wherewith again to engage Hopton and Maurice, the task of saving Gloucester from the King's army fell to Essex.

  1. In the context of India in the 1840s to 1947, how far can independence ...

    Further discontent was caused when a peaceful demonstration in Amritsar on the 13th April 1919, descended into massacre when Brigadier-General Dyer opened fire on thousands of unarmed civilians, who were unable to escape. Considered ?one of the most brutal episodes in the history of the Raj?,[17] nearly four hundred people were killed; it was followed by public floggings and humiliation.

  2. How far do you agree that by 1763 the ties between Britain and the ...

    the King could dismiss governors in Royal Colonies and the Privy Council could veto legislations passed by the lower house. However the colonies enjoyed a high degree of salutary neglect as the British government were reluctant to do anything that might cause trouble in the colonies.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work