• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Disputes at Yalta and Potsdam were more important than previous war-time disagreements in the collapse of the Grand Alliance in 1945. How far do you agree with this view?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Disputes at Yalta and Potsdam were more important than previous war-time disagreements in the collapse of the Grand Alliance in 1945." How far do you agree with this view? After the invasion of the Soviet Union in June 1941, the USSR found itself fighting along side Britain. After the bombing of Pearl Harbour the USSR more shockingly found itself in alliance with USA. Hostility between East and West was to be temporarily forgotten and the Grand Alliance was formed; yet with such previous opposition, tension began to emerge within. In 1945 post-war negotiations began at the Yalta conference which was surprisingly accommodating: the Soviet Union agreed to join war against Japan and follow the principle of free elections in Eastern Europe. Despite these agreements however, most people feared Stalin's word to be dishonest and there was major conflict over the issue of Polish Government and territory. ...read more.

Middle

The Orthadox view would be that timing was crucial for the second front to be successful; either way there is not doubt that the question of the second front was an important disagreement between the Grand Alliance. It is important not to disregard other conflicts when considering the collapse of the Grand Alliance. An extremely important one is the ever present clash of ideologies; Marxism-Leninism "the origins of the Cold War lay in the hostility between these two competing views" S. Phillips. The vast contrasts of the USSR and the USA are reflected in the ideas and personalities that their leaders had and despite mutual respect they held many felt a clash between the two great powers to be inevitable. Tension rose and contributed to the deterioration of the alliance. Britain had officially gone to war against Germany in 1939 to uphold the independence of Poland; making this country's fate one of the utmost significance. ...read more.

Conclusion

One issue that has not been mentioned is possibly the most important; suspicion seems to be a clear underpinning factor to all these disagreements that ultimately lead to the collapse of the Grand Alliance. Each of the events prior to, during and post-war have all increased suspicions that the USA and USSR were harbouring. Stalin was wary from the beginning after America's intervention of the Civil War that only just placed the Bolsheviks in power. The show trials illustrated the aggressive nature of Russia's government this combined with the information leaking from Riga created huge suspicions towards the USSR These foundations of tension were built up with further suspicions on deciding the second front, the clash of Marxism and Leninism, decisions made at Yalta and Potsdam, and the idea that a clash was inevitable. Thus this leads to the conclusion that all the factors played a part and that it was ultimately suspicion that heightened each situation so much that the Grand Alliance collapsed in 1945. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Assess the view that Stalins suspicions of his western allies between 1941 and 1945 ...

    4 star(s)

    It is without this consideration it would appear that Wolfson is strongest in his argument. Historian James Fitzgerald argues that the independence of post-war Poland was undermined by decisions taken at the Teheran Conference in November 1943. His view was that the Western Allies created a situation which no independent

  2. Would you agree with the view that conflict over Berlin in the period 1945-1990 ...

    Stalin's aim for Eastern Europe was to spread communism and to create a zone of friendly governments as a defence against the West. President Truman, who disliked Stalin, saw communism as an evil force creeping across Europe and threatening countries around the world.

  1. Discuss the claim that Stalin(TM)s actions in Eastern Europe during 1944 and 1945 were ...

    Because Poland was of particular interest to Stalin, after being the route of three invasions of the USSR; it worried the Allies greatly creating clashes at their very first meeting in Teheran. Stalin was extremely crafty in the negotiations over Polish territory, source B covers the fate of post-war Poland; "There was discussion over the boundaries of post-war Poland."

  2. Causes of show trials + purges of 1930s.

    the articles is that the authors saw the actions by Stalin and the Communist Party to be ruthless. The reaction in the UK, particularly London, was completely different to the reaction in the USA and Canada. In the newspaper called The Times, there were a number of articles, that were

  1. How important was war in Lenin's securing and consolidation of power in the USSR.

    However, after persuading his own party, other socialists still believed Lenin to be a madman. His plan had partly backfired, as he now put himself under isolation, his party only numbered 26,000 which was a large minority. In July 1917 riots broke out in Petrograd, but The Provisional Government used troops to end the riots and ordered Lenin's arrest.

  2. Why was there so much mistrust between the Soviet Union and the West by ...

    His plan was to occupy a number of "satellite" states in Eastern Europe and therefore create a 'buffer' which could bear the brunt of any attack. He thought he could achieve this by bullying Truman and Attlee who were both new to their jobs and therefore probably insecure and, possibly, weak.

  1. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    Women did not enjoy the same party benefits as men and they could be undermined easily in the party. One of the few prominent party members was Alexandra Kollontai (member of Central Committee and Commissar for Social Welfare) but she had a disagreement with Lenin and was demoted.

  2. The Holocaust was the result of Hitlers long held grand design to pursue a ...

    Stenographic report of a meeting on the Jewish question, chaired by Goering, 12 November 1938 This source again undermines the main contention of the Intentionalist historiography, that Hitler was key and fundamental in the orchestration of the Final Solution.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work