• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Disputes at Yalta and Potsdam were more important than previous war-time disagreements in the collapse of the Grand Alliance in 1945. How far do you agree with this view?

Extracts from this document...


"Disputes at Yalta and Potsdam were more important than previous war-time disagreements in the collapse of the Grand Alliance in 1945." How far do you agree with this view? After the invasion of the Soviet Union in June 1941, the USSR found itself fighting along side Britain. After the bombing of Pearl Harbour the USSR more shockingly found itself in alliance with USA. Hostility between East and West was to be temporarily forgotten and the Grand Alliance was formed; yet with such previous opposition, tension began to emerge within. In 1945 post-war negotiations began at the Yalta conference which was surprisingly accommodating: the Soviet Union agreed to join war against Japan and follow the principle of free elections in Eastern Europe. Despite these agreements however, most people feared Stalin's word to be dishonest and there was major conflict over the issue of Polish Government and territory. ...read more.


The Orthadox view would be that timing was crucial for the second front to be successful; either way there is not doubt that the question of the second front was an important disagreement between the Grand Alliance. It is important not to disregard other conflicts when considering the collapse of the Grand Alliance. An extremely important one is the ever present clash of ideologies; Marxism-Leninism "the origins of the Cold War lay in the hostility between these two competing views" S. Phillips. The vast contrasts of the USSR and the USA are reflected in the ideas and personalities that their leaders had and despite mutual respect they held many felt a clash between the two great powers to be inevitable. Tension rose and contributed to the deterioration of the alliance. Britain had officially gone to war against Germany in 1939 to uphold the independence of Poland; making this country's fate one of the utmost significance. ...read more.


One issue that has not been mentioned is possibly the most important; suspicion seems to be a clear underpinning factor to all these disagreements that ultimately lead to the collapse of the Grand Alliance. Each of the events prior to, during and post-war have all increased suspicions that the USA and USSR were harbouring. Stalin was wary from the beginning after America's intervention of the Civil War that only just placed the Bolsheviks in power. The show trials illustrated the aggressive nature of Russia's government this combined with the information leaking from Riga created huge suspicions towards the USSR These foundations of tension were built up with further suspicions on deciding the second front, the clash of Marxism and Leninism, decisions made at Yalta and Potsdam, and the idea that a clash was inevitable. Thus this leads to the conclusion that all the factors played a part and that it was ultimately suspicion that heightened each situation so much that the Grand Alliance collapsed in 1945. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Assess the view that Stalins suspicions of his western allies between 1941 and 1945 ...

    4 star(s)

    It is without this consideration it would appear that Wolfson is strongest in his argument. Historian James Fitzgerald argues that the independence of post-war Poland was undermined by decisions taken at the Teheran Conference in November 1943. His view was that the Western Allies created a situation which no independent

  2. Causes of show trials + purges of 1930s.

    fact that there had been great Russian casualties in the offensive, but because of the fact that the people were war weary and wanted an end to the war not an extension and prolongation of it. It seems odd that Kerensky should push for an offensive when the controversy surrounding Milyukov's note is considered.

  1. Would you agree with the view that conflict over Berlin in the period 1945-1990 ...

    Ultimately Stalin failed to keep his promises and quickly prevented popular elections in Poland, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, Rumania and Bulgaria by assigning permanent communist governments and suppressing all democratic supporters. The result was the creation of a buffer zone between Russia and the West.

  2. Discuss the claim that Stalin(TM)s actions in Eastern Europe during 1944 and 1945 were ...

    Because Poland was of particular interest to Stalin, after being the route of three invasions of the USSR; it worried the Allies greatly creating clashes at their very first meeting in Teheran. Stalin was extremely crafty in the negotiations over Polish territory, source B covers the fate of post-war Poland; "There was discussion over the boundaries of post-war Poland."

  1. How important was war in Lenin's securing and consolidation of power in the USSR.

    His persuasiveness, one of Lenin's key attributes, won the party around, and he also kept an understanding, that the Soviets would only take over when the Bolsheviks had a majority in them. Another show of Lenin's genius when it came to bargaining and persuading.

  2. Why was there so much mistrust between the Soviet Union and the West by ...

    His plan was to occupy a number of "satellite" states in Eastern Europe and therefore create a 'buffer' which could bear the brunt of any attack. He thought he could achieve this by bullying Truman and Attlee who were both new to their jobs and therefore probably insecure and, possibly, weak.

  1. The Holocaust was the result of Hitlers long held grand design to pursue a ...

    Rather the way in which Hitler allowed rival agencies to improvise policies and to compete for his approval led to a ?cumulative radicalisation?. Mommsen is a key figure belonging to the Structuralist school of History and is a well-respected eminent German Historian.

  2. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    Provided people followed the party line, they were treated well and became successful and wealthy. Many writers and artists disappeared during the Great Terror for not promoting Stalin?s policies. In 1932, all existing proletarian artistic organisations were merged into one single union and Stalin?s hold over cultural life was complete.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work