• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Meddling and troublesome(TM)- how accurate a description is this of Elizabeth I(TM)s parliaments?

Extracts from this document...


'Meddling and troublesome'- how accurate a description is this of Elizabeth I's parliaments? Henry VIII's reign had seen the monarch using Parliament as a way of sanctioning his own religious and political wishes, to give legitimacy to constitutional changes as by gaining the consent of Parliament, technically a representation of the English people, Henry could claim that the changes had the support of the country. However, Parliament had merely passed all the Bills and Acts that Henry had requested with little or no discussion. However, neither Elizabeth nor her siblings possessed the force of personality necessary to control Parliament with such ease, and it was during her reign that they began to increase in power. Due to the structure of the English government there existed technically a balance of power between the monarch and Parliament, in which Parliament had to give its consent to proposals by the Queen in order for them to become law. However, final authority undoubtedly lay with the monarch and according to custom and tradition, Parliament was expected to merely consider the issues that the Queen raised, and give their consent for them to become laws, which was seen as their duty as loyal subjects. There were certain subjects which lay within the royal prerogative, which Elizabeth did not wish to have Parliament discuss or advise her on. Within this domain lay issues of national importance, such as religion, foreign policy, royal finance, whether or not she should marry, who should succeed her, and matters of a personal nature such as who she chose to favour. ...read more.


Despite the dissolution of this link when Francis died in 1562, the English suspicion of a Scottish-Franco alliance was still prevalent. Many feared that were Mary to take the throne, England would become a mere pawn of the continental power of France. Her Catholicism was also of course a huge threat as she became the figurehead for various Catholic plots, and hence her very existence was presented a threat to Elizabeth and her Government. As Catholics believed Elizabeth to be illegitimate they were anxious to have her replaced with the 'rightful' heir who in their eyes was Mary. By 1571 Parliament demanded the execution of Mary, following the exposure of the Ridolfi plot. Elizabeth's reluctance was seen as exasperating but of course, she held final say over the matter and Mary survived. She held her ground over the unremitting pressure and fought proposals to have Mary attainted and barred from the succession. It is not clear why she felt such reluctance to execute Mary, but perhaps it was a personal dislike of executing monarchy (she didn't want to give the impression that this was an acceptable thing to do), however unpragmatic this may have been. Elizabeth used her customary skill to divert parliament's attention to another matter. However, by the 1580s Mary represented such a danger to Elizabeth's personal safety that it became impossible for her to ignore the issue. ...read more.


On reflection Elizabeth's parliament still had a great deal of respect for her and in no way set out to undermine her authority or question her right or the right of the institution of the monarchy over them. When they did clash it was over issues on which Elizabeth's safety or that of the Tudor dynasty was at stake, indicating a concern for her welfare and that of the country rather than any significant differing of opinion or wish to create unrest. This is especially well illustrated over the marriage and succession issue, and the problem of Mary Queen of Scots. Therefore, although perhaps Parliament can be said to have illustrated more independence of opinion than ever before, Neale's theory of the Puritan Choir representing an opposition party within Parliament has been significantly discredited for us to safely say that Parliament was in fact an extension of Elizabeth's Privy Council, therefore working with her rather than against her. If anything on occasions where her occasionally irrational decisions threatened to pose a danger, her parliaments merely attempted to put enough pressure by public opinion to coerce her in to taking the lesser of two evils. So, while perhaps being more meddling than previously seen, it would be unfair to describe Elizabeth's Parliaments as troublesome as they were ultimately acting out of concern for Elizabeth's safety and a wish to create stability within England. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. coursework on Elizabeth I

    She also wanted to show herself as being regal and dignified, so better than common peasants. She wore expensive, extravagant costumes and placed crowns and jewels in the background to show to the English just how rich she really was, and made her skin pale to show she didn't need to work.

  2. Assess the validity of the view that the Rump and Barebones parliaments had no ...

    The Rumpers were apparently intending to "perpetuate themselves" rather than to transfer their power to a temporary council of MPs who would oversee fresh elections as agreed on 19th April 1653. Whether or not this is true it still gave people at the time and later historians the impression of a weak, corrupt, self-interested government.

  1. "Conflict and Contest" or "Cooperation and consent," which phrase best sums up Elizabeth I's ...

    This view is backed up by the fact that Elizabeth imprisoned the Bishop of Winchester and the Bishop of Lincoln, after their public dispute with Protestants, showing that she viewed them as opposition. Another event that backs this up is that all but one bishop in the House of Lords

  2. To what extent was there a Struggle for Power between Elizabeth I and her ...

    The Privy Council took the lead here, applying pressure on the Queen through the Commons and the Lords. Bishops produced theoretical arguments and a committee of lawyers produced legal reasons. As a result of this, two bills were produced, one a petition for Mary's attainder for treason, the other excluding her from the succession.

  1. "An exercise in Dynastic Consolidation" - How far is this an accurate description of ...

    In spite of the truce with France, Henry negotiated a commercial treaty with Brittany, another country that had had helped him in his time of exile. Also. In January 1487 Henry renewed Edward IV's treaty with Maximilian, King of

  2. 'A religious settlement of her own choosing'. How far is this an accurate view ...

    was that which was to be reviewed by the committee of divines it called for. Staying with Jones's theory, it seems it was the resistance of the Marian bishops and a group of conservative peers in the Upper House which caused the decisive trouble for the government.

  1. East of Eden: An Interpretation

    These examples include Charles, Cathy, and Caleb. Charles had become jealous at the fact that his father got more pleasure out of Adam's gift than out of his own, and in a rage, tried to kill his brother. This was the first story line that followed that of Cain and Abel.

  2. How was Isabella able to secure her succession to the Castilian throne in 1469-1479?

    Naturally, any full-scale war causes major problems, but especially so if your throne is not secure.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work