• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Foreign policy was the major reason for the breakdown of crown-Parliament relations from 1625-1629

Extracts from this document...


?It was the foreign policy of Charles I that led to the breakdown of the relationship between crown and Parliament in the years 1625-1629? Though foreign policy was one of the main contributing factors as to why the relationship between Crown and Parliament broke down, there were other reasons of the same significance that created the total destruction. These other reasons are things such as; Charles? personality, religion and finance. Religion for instance caused great division between the two, with Charles openly supporting anti-Calvinism and Montagu and his two writings, A New Gagg For An Olde Goose and Apello Caesarem that made Parliament grow suspicious of his religious intentions. At the beginning of his reign, Charles immediately brought unrest simply because of him being the ?mirror opposite? (Cogswell) of his successor, his father, James who was ?gregarious and loquacious? (Smith), in contrast to Charles, who appeared ?taciturn and cold? (Smith). This, for obvious reasons, circulated an air of uncertainty around him, as it was a vast change. However, it is said that these personality flaws stemmed from his childhood and his stammer that he struggled to overcome and further hindered him from being a successful ruler as he was unable to communicate and rarely explained his actions. ...read more.


At this point, Charles makes a deal with the judge to call an interim ruling, meaning the outcome is in his favour. However, this would only be special to this particular scenario and Charles was aware another case may appear and has this rule changed into one that applied to any similar situation; from a rule of court to a firm precedent. This would never have been found out were it not for Buckingham who broadcast the fact that Charles had manipulated the courts which as a consequence allowed for further distrust towards Charles as his underhand ways were highlighted to everyone and proving he could manipulate the system in an unfair and unjust way. In addition, the pairing of the Petition of Right and the Three Resolutions, something, which Parliament felt they had to enforce in an attempt to control Charles. The Petition of Right came about due to the failed Bill of Rights, by Seldom and Elliot- extreme Parliamentary members. However, it was seen as a damning upon the king and so was rewritten and made more conservative so that Charles would actually agree and have it passed. ...read more.


Charles put this into action as he had no Parliamentary financial support and a war with Spain and France was strongly under threat. In conclusion, I do not think that Foreign policy solely on its own was to blame for the breakdown of relationship between Crown and Parliament as that, as a factor on its own, doesn?t constitute a relationship breakdown. However, if combined with the others, it would create a lot of distrust towards Charles and his disloyalty would only fuel this, which would then result in the final breakdown of the relationship. The one key factor that seems to stem the others, would he his personality. Charles was well known for being arrogant, believing in his own self-righteousness and acting without explanation, mainly because of his inferiority complex produced by his stammer. As king, it lead him to be paranoid over critiques and possible opposition that can act as almost a justification for his actions and own style of rule. It is also probable that did he not have these character flaws, he would have refrained from acting as he did and the relationship would have been pleasant and it would not have suffered a breakdown as a direct result. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    History of british race relations

    3 star(s)

    (Sims, GR, Living in London, 1904) During the early 1900's, Thomas Dewar and William Evan-Gordon campaigned in the east end with an aim to bring limitations to immigration. It worked; in 1903 parliament called a royal commission and two years later the first aliens act limiting immigration into Britain was passed.

  2. Why did King Charles I Resort to Personal Rule in 1629?

    to refer to, effectively constricting the King a lot further than he had been before. It also forced the king to rely on Parliament because it outlawed forced loans and imprisonment without just cause. The King signed it, but it was to cause him trouble in the future.

  1. Why did Charles' relationship with Parliament deteriorate between 1625-1629? ...

    The trip was unsuccessful and caused considerable embarrassment for Charles and Buckingham, leading them to declare war with Spain in vengeance, undoing King James' efforts to keep the peace. He also negotiated Charles' marriage to the Catholic princess, Henrietta Maria and led many unsuccessful expeditions, including the ill-managed attack on

  2. Why Did Charles Dissolve Parliament in 1629?

    when Charles imprisoned the 76 people who refused to pay the loan. Judges refused to pronounce the loan as legal so five nights brought a case against the crown due to the fundamental law of habeas corpus (if you are not charged within 24 hours of detention, you must be released).

  1. Why was there a breakdown in relationship between king and parliament in 1629?

    to a mere 3,000 due to starvation, lack of resources and medical problems. To parliament this was the wrong action to have been taken by Charles and the King and parliament become divided over the management of the war and tensions began to arise over the foreign policy of the king and how it was governed.

  2. Why did Charles I decide to dissolve parliament in 1629?

    The Attorney General (royal legal officer) on Charles's side tried to change records, on Charles's 'request', so when this story emerged Charles's reputation was damaged. This was a decision Charles should have regretted that left Parliament seething. In 1628 Parliament offered five subsidies and tonnage and poundage.

  1. To what extent did foreign policy sour relations between the monarch and Parliament between ...

    After this time, however, relations between monarch and Parliament began to sour, and one of the key factors in this breakdown of relations was the foreign policy pursued by James from 1614 onwards. From this time, James attempted to negotiate marriage - first for his eldest son and then, after

  2. How far was foreign policy the main cause of conflict between Crown and Parliament ...

    James was forced to make concessions: monies granted by parliament would be under a Commons committee and the king would discuss declarations of war or peace with parliament before hand. Parliament then granted £300,000 for a naval war in defence of the ‘true religion’.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work