• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

From a military perspective examine the changing nature of U.S Foreign policy in the post cold war era.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

From a military perspective examine the changing nature of U.S Foreign policy in the post cold war era. Since the end of the cold war we have seen a dramatic change in U.S foreign policy towards Europe. We have seen it change from one of suspicion and aggression towards the Soviet Union to one that is ready to work together militarily with most members of Europe. Many different events have seen the U.S work together with Europe mostly at peacekeeping but many events have also contradicted this and shown problems in the relationship between the two. President Reagan foresaw the coming changes that took place and proclaimed in a speech to the house of commons in 1982 that 'while we must be cautious about forcing the pace of change, we must not hesitate to declare our ultimate objectives and take concrete actions to move towards them' (Reagan, 1982, www.mtholyoke.edu). This essay is designed to help the reader understand significant events that influenced U.S foreign policy towards Europe, how these events changed or help to explain current foreign policy and what the nature of U.S foreign policy was and what it is today. First to understand how U.S foreign policy has changed we must first take a brief look at what it used to be during the cold war era. America was very suspicious of the Soviet Union and their foreign policy took a realist perspective which 'was couched in terms of self interest, indeed, in terms of national survival' (McKay, 2001, page 311). ...read more.

Middle

In one report it was claimed that 'America, France and Britain - the driving force behind the military effort - have displayed an impressive degree of unity' (Economist, 9th Sept 1995, page 37) which supports the claim that since the cold war era relations between the U.S and Europe have been improved, especially with Russia supporting the efforts in Bosnia which could not have been predicted considering the atrocious state of U.S-Soviet relations under a decade ago during the cold war After Bill Clinton decided to get the U.S militarily involved in the Bosnian conflict he began to be more involved in foreign policy towards Europe, with some crowning him as 'a foreign policy president' (Economist, Oct 14th 1995, page 67). This was partly due to his efforts to be re-elected, especially after the loss of power over America's domestic agenda now that the Republican party controlled Congress. His involvement in Bosnia 'he boasts...are bringing results' (Economist, Oct 14th 1995, page 67) and with progress being made in other European areas of military conflict like the diplomatic talks in Northern Ireland and later military action in Kosovo we can see what a significant difference Clinton made to the nature of U.S foreign policy, how he has moved America into closer understanding with Europe and how he has helped shape U.S foreign policy into what it has become in present day. He helped America make the transitional stage from being a lone actor on international affairs, which they had been for some time, to one that is the leader who works closely with her allies. ...read more.

Conclusion

than ever before. However not every European supported America with some believing that 'the attacks on America were a consequence of the evils of American foreign policy' (Economist, Sept 15th 2001, page 21) which shows that U.S foreign policy must also be careful because it has enemies in Europe as well as the middle east. To conclude we must look at the past decade since the end of the cold war and realise that American foreign policy has moved on a great deal. The 'New World Order' in 1991 'recognised that the U.S could not do everything' (Dumbrell, 1997, page 163) and signalled the start of an American Foreign Policy that relied more on multilateral action rather than unilateral. This change has meant that the U.S has had to find closer friends and has therefore brought Europe in as a closer ally than ever before. The different conflicts that America has joined on European soil, fighting with European soldiers in Bosnia and Kosovo has brought the two together through co-operation on military matters. Also 'the September 11th attacks will not be an American return to isolationism, but a reinvigoration of engagement' (Gordon, 2001, www.brook.edu) with relations with Russia never being so good in the post-cold war era. This constantly changing world environment means that the future of U.S foreign policy will never be certain but the days of isolationism and suspicion of Europe are for the moment behind us and with the new war on terrorism in which America will lead 'U.S foreign policy will probably never be the same again' (Gordon, 2001, www.brook.edu). ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. This graduation paper is about U.S. - Soviet relations in Cold War period. Our ...

    Yet these very commitments threatened to generate misunderstanding and conflict with the Soviet Union whose own priorities were much more directly expressed in terms of "practical arithmetic." Russia wanted security. The Soviet Union sought a sphere of influence over which it could have unrestricted control.

  2. The Cold War was a big rivalry that developed after World War II.

    troops from Europe in 2 years � new French zone added to occupation zones of Germany, but Stalin allowed $20 billion reparations from East Germany � Decalaration on Liberated Europe promises "free and unfettered elections", but secret agreement on Curzon boundary � United Nations to be created, but Stalin gets

  1. Superpower Relations 1945-90

    The airlift was their way of calling his bluff. Stalin had no choice but to call off the blockade, since the only other way to get the Allies out of Berlin would have been by force. That would have led to a 3rd world war.

  2. What part did Ronald Reagan play in bringing the Cold War to an end?

    position of strength.'6 Reagan came to power with a mandate to do this, and between 1981 and 1986 military spending doubled, which was the biggest increase since the 1960s and the 'missile gap' scare.7 Consequently new missile and stealth bomber programmes were commenced or re-commenced, and the Strategic Defence Initiative (S.D.I.)

  1. Assess the strategic strengths and weaknesses of America's 'containment of communism' policy since 1945.

    Walzer states: "Searching for a level of conflict at which our technical superiority could be brought to bear, we steadily escalated the trouble , until finally it was an American war, fought for American purposes, in someone else's country."15 Nixon had realised this and this became one of the parts of the 'Nixon Doctrine'.

  2. The aim of this essay is to evaluate if the end of the Cold ...

    and Liberal Democracy(the West). The period of 1945 and 1947 saw an increase in the consolidation of the Soviet Union over Eastern Europe; this contributed more to the estrangement of the superpowers and began the Cold War in earnest. The Cold War was first focussed in Europe but soon spread

  1. Superpower Relations and the Thaw in the Cold War

    * Rise of communism in Vietnam seemingly confirmed US suspicions. European Decolonisation * European no longer possessed the will nor the resources to retain their vast overseas empires. * The power vacuum left by the defeat of Nazi Germany had been filled by 1948 * However, the process of decolonisation

  2. How significant was the presence of foreign powers as an influence on the nature ...

    The League of Nations took no territorial integrity into consideration when doing this, and, run by the allies, self interest took priority as each vied for power within the Middle East. Dr Nigel Ashton supports this by stating that the mandates ??sowed the dragon?s teeth?? which eventually grew into a

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work