• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

From a military perspective examine the changing nature of U.S Foreign policy in the post cold war era.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

From a military perspective examine the changing nature of U.S Foreign policy in the post cold war era. Since the end of the cold war we have seen a dramatic change in U.S foreign policy towards Europe. We have seen it change from one of suspicion and aggression towards the Soviet Union to one that is ready to work together militarily with most members of Europe. Many different events have seen the U.S work together with Europe mostly at peacekeeping but many events have also contradicted this and shown problems in the relationship between the two. President Reagan foresaw the coming changes that took place and proclaimed in a speech to the house of commons in 1982 that 'while we must be cautious about forcing the pace of change, we must not hesitate to declare our ultimate objectives and take concrete actions to move towards them' (Reagan, 1982, www.mtholyoke.edu). This essay is designed to help the reader understand significant events that influenced U.S foreign policy towards Europe, how these events changed or help to explain current foreign policy and what the nature of U.S foreign policy was and what it is today. First to understand how U.S foreign policy has changed we must first take a brief look at what it used to be during the cold war era. America was very suspicious of the Soviet Union and their foreign policy took a realist perspective which 'was couched in terms of self interest, indeed, in terms of national survival' (McKay, 2001, page 311). ...read more.

Middle

In one report it was claimed that 'America, France and Britain - the driving force behind the military effort - have displayed an impressive degree of unity' (Economist, 9th Sept 1995, page 37) which supports the claim that since the cold war era relations between the U.S and Europe have been improved, especially with Russia supporting the efforts in Bosnia which could not have been predicted considering the atrocious state of U.S-Soviet relations under a decade ago during the cold war After Bill Clinton decided to get the U.S militarily involved in the Bosnian conflict he began to be more involved in foreign policy towards Europe, with some crowning him as 'a foreign policy president' (Economist, Oct 14th 1995, page 67). This was partly due to his efforts to be re-elected, especially after the loss of power over America's domestic agenda now that the Republican party controlled Congress. His involvement in Bosnia 'he boasts...are bringing results' (Economist, Oct 14th 1995, page 67) and with progress being made in other European areas of military conflict like the diplomatic talks in Northern Ireland and later military action in Kosovo we can see what a significant difference Clinton made to the nature of U.S foreign policy, how he has moved America into closer understanding with Europe and how he has helped shape U.S foreign policy into what it has become in present day. He helped America make the transitional stage from being a lone actor on international affairs, which they had been for some time, to one that is the leader who works closely with her allies. ...read more.

Conclusion

than ever before. However not every European supported America with some believing that 'the attacks on America were a consequence of the evils of American foreign policy' (Economist, Sept 15th 2001, page 21) which shows that U.S foreign policy must also be careful because it has enemies in Europe as well as the middle east. To conclude we must look at the past decade since the end of the cold war and realise that American foreign policy has moved on a great deal. The 'New World Order' in 1991 'recognised that the U.S could not do everything' (Dumbrell, 1997, page 163) and signalled the start of an American Foreign Policy that relied more on multilateral action rather than unilateral. This change has meant that the U.S has had to find closer friends and has therefore brought Europe in as a closer ally than ever before. The different conflicts that America has joined on European soil, fighting with European soldiers in Bosnia and Kosovo has brought the two together through co-operation on military matters. Also 'the September 11th attacks will not be an American return to isolationism, but a reinvigoration of engagement' (Gordon, 2001, www.brook.edu) with relations with Russia never being so good in the post-cold war era. This constantly changing world environment means that the future of U.S foreign policy will never be certain but the days of isolationism and suspicion of Europe are for the moment behind us and with the new war on terrorism in which America will lead 'U.S foreign policy will probably never be the same again' (Gordon, 2001, www.brook.edu). ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Who was responsible for the start of the Cold war?

    As a result hostility between the two countries rose to an all new level, even to the extent where ordinary Americans were told to look for 'Red's under the bed,' a reference to communist spies. There is definitely a strong case for arguing that the dawn of Russian nuclear capability marked the beginning of the 'Cold war.'

  2. What part did Ronald Reagan play in bringing the Cold War to an end?

    position of strength.'6 Reagan came to power with a mandate to do this, and between 1981 and 1986 military spending doubled, which was the biggest increase since the 1960s and the 'missile gap' scare.7 Consequently new missile and stealth bomber programmes were commenced or re-commenced, and the Strategic Defence Initiative (S.D.I.)

  1. Japan: Post-Occupation Era 1952-80

    He was forced to resign owing to a scandal?? involving the shipping industry. At that moment, the socialists increased their influence. Hence, to keep itself in power, in November 1955 the Liberal Party merged??itself with another conservative party, the Democratic Party.

  2. Free essay

    Do you consider military intervention in Africa as successful? Focus on the policies in ...

    UNTAG subsequently had the task of supervising an apparently non-contentious transition. Forces of SWAPO crossed the border from Angola on the day the cease-fire leading to the transition was due to come into effect, and were bloodily suppressed by South African forces with the consent of the Special Representative of the UN Secretary-General (UNSGSR)

  1. Superpower Relations and the Thaw in the Cold War

    Marking a border between the two different spheres of influence * The insecurity of the second half of the 1940?s had been caused by both sides attempting to mark out their areas of dominance. * By 1949, the division of Europe had become entrenched, the US military commitment to NATO

  2. The aim of this essay is to evaluate if the end of the Cold ...

    its dynamics into the other parts of the globe such as Asia, Middle East and Africa where the hot wars within the Cold War were fought. The conflicts were fought in most parts of the world with the West backing one side and the East supporting another side.

  1. How significant was the presence of foreign powers as an influence on the nature ...

    ??complex of tensions and despotisms that constitute the contemporary Middle East??[9] The creation of the new modern states was carried with no cultural, historical or political knowledge over where the ideal place to establish borders would be, and therefore, without regard to natural or human boundaries, they were made according to distinct territorial entities.

  2. How far did dtente introduce a new era of co-operation in US-Soviet relations during ...

    Coming into the talks America had 1,054 inter-continental ballistic missiles (ICBMs), 656 submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs) and 540 long range bombers whilst the Soviets had 1200 ICBMs, 200 SLBMs and 200 bombers. Thanks to these circumstances both sides were sufficiently interested to sign agreements over an anti-ballistic missile treaty, where each side was limited to 2 systems ? discouraging aggression.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work