• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Germanys invasion of Belgium in 1914 was completely unjustifiable. Use sources A-E to show far the evidence confirms this statement. (AS May/June 2009)

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

?Germany?s invasion of Belgium in 1914 was completely unjustifiable?. Use sources A-E to show far the evidence confirms this statement. Germany invaded Belgium on 3 April 1414. There is evidence from these sources that both supports and contradicts the claim that Germany?s invasion of Belgium was unjustifiable. In both Source C and Source D, they agree that Germany?s invasion was unjustified, although Source D agrees to this to a limited extent only. Source C describes the invasion in almost personal tones by the use of the word ?painful?. It is clear that the Belgian Government was unsympathetic to the German army?s request of free passage through their country to reach France. Germany?s advance is an ?attack on her independence?, and this is emphasized by ?no military or strategic interest justifies such a violation?. Therefore Source C is of the view that the invasion was completely unjustifiable. Source D makes the point that the British Government was in support of the Belgian Government. ...read more.

Middle

In total contrast, Sources B and E share a similarity with the view that the German invasion was completely justified. Source B offers the view that Germany is on the defensive against France, and that the German Government fears that Belgium will be unable ?to resist such a considerable French invasion? without the aid of Germany. This puts the blame of the Belgium invasion squarely on France, as Germany is portrayed as a friend of Belgium who seeks only to help them. The source fails to mention that France was not hostile to Belgium at all. The reliability of this Source is thus questionable. The Schlieffen Plan depended on France declaring war on Germany. However, this had not yet occurred by 2 August, and the Schlieffen Plan was doomed if France did not lead an attack. Therefore, to ensure the Schlieffen Plan worked, Germany had to engage France in war and the only way they could do this was to invade Belgium to cross into France. ...read more.

Conclusion

The Source may be interpreted as being fairly reliable. The report being printed in a German newspaper, and the writer not having injected any personal opinion but only writing down the exact words of the German politicians, shows that there is no bias in the report. However, it is unlikely that ministers and politicians would announce aggressive policies candidly. Source B and E both show a similarity in claiming that the Germans advancement into Belgium as a ?wrong? that they commit. This is corroborated by all the other sources. However, only Source B and E maintain that it is justifiable for several reasons. In conclusion, although there is evidence in the Sources both to challenge and support the claim that Germany?s invasion of Belgium in 1914 was completely unjustifiable, I believe that there was no real cause for the invasion. It was because of the Schlieffen Plan that demanded France?s declaration of war that hadn?t come yet, that led to the invasion. Therefore they invaded for no real justifiable reason. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Versailles Treaty- evaluation of sources

    Interpretation A is limited in the sense that it doesn't pinpoint whether the peacemakers are to be criticised. Nonetheless, the passage acknowledges that the punitive terms set by the peacemakers' rarely ensured peace but instilled an irrevocable bitterness in the Germans and this "desire to reverse the judgement of Versailles" meant that conflict was forthcoming.

  2. Causes of show trials + purges of 1930s.

    Kerensky used this as a way to "blacken the Bolshevik name" and increase the provisional government power, thus proving that the provisional government was not as weak or unorganised as originally thought. Yet the provisional government proved how weak they truly were by allowing the Bolshevik leaders back into Russia to defeat General Kornilov.

  1. Hitlers Germany

    The surge of enterprise which brought Germany its remarkable improvement in the standard of living made the way of a liberal, democratic economy an easy one for the working population to accept and cherish. West Germany lost through strikes from 1949 to 1954 an average of only 103 man hours per thousand employed.

  2. How far do David Low’s cartoons show the reasons for the failure of the ...

    To discourage aggression from any nation, to encourage countries to cooperate, to encourage nations to disarm and to improve the living and working conditions of people around the world. The structure of the League may of seemed strong in the early years but in the 1930's the underlying problems would be revealed.

  1. How did Britain Survive (June 1940-1943)?

    One of the things that perhaps was the greatest asset to the British during the Battle of Britain was the radar. The experienced radar operators were able to accurately estimate the size and speed of the approaching aircraft. This meant that the RAF was never caught unprepared, previously Germany was

  2. World War Two Sources Questions

    He and his generals and the remaining troops in the city surrendered without a fight. Therefore we can see that the source gives us a very good explanation of the background information as to why the Germans surrendered. However, the actual surrender could be misleading, and we also need to know of the Russians participating role in the whole situation.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work