• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month


Extracts from this document...


GOVERNMENT POLICY WAS THE KEY CAUSE OF THE WALL STREET CRASH. HOW FAR DO YOU AGREE WITH THIS VIEW? The Wall Street Crash, which occurred in October 1929, was the mass selling of shares, which led to a massive drop in prices, which prompted further selling of shares. In one day, $14 billion was wiped off the value of the stock market. This panic selling was triggered by rumours and fears that the stock market was about to collapse (these rumours were brought about by large share holders, like Baruch and Kennedy dumping shares, and news of the collapse of the British financial empire which was financed by debt and credit, just like America's). But why did a sudden loss of confidence have such massive repercussions? The answer lies in the long term problems in the economy which had created instability and weaknesses in the economy. Until October 1929 these weaknesses had been masked by the confidence of American people and businesses; the high prices of stocks and shares were the result of speculation - the belief or confidence that they were worth more. But as confidence crumbled, there was nothing left to sustain the economy. The key reason why the economy could not sustain itself was because the policies of the government had created major faults in the American economy, and in every area of the economy, which meant that what started as mass selling of shares resulted in a major Wall Street Crash. ...read more.


Whilst in principle these actions were supportive, in practice they artificially propped up the German economy, which led to massive investment in Germany ($3,900million was invested after the Dawes Plan) as investors hoped to make a quick buck, just like they were in the American 'get rich quick' / speculative economy. This meant that government policy had in fact encouraged investment at home and abroad based on speculation. When investors realised that the returns (values) of stocks at home and abroad were artificially high, it would trigger a loss of confidence and massive sales - i.e. the Wall Street Crash. Another reason why government policies caused the Wall Street Crash is because the government pursued a laissez faire policy towards businesses and regulation. As a result, the 1920s were characterised by the creation of trusts and corporations - such as US Steel. The government actively ignored anti-trust laws, rather than using their federal powers to police and regulate industry. In a case heard at the Supreme Court the government argued that big businesses were not illegal, so long as some competition remained. However, in reality, the trusts wiped out competition - fixing prices and swallowing up smaller businesses (for every 4 businesses that succeeded in the 1920s, 3 failed). As a result, 1000s of smaller businesses failed, whilst the trusts became 'captains of industry', with the knowledge and the money to produce things very quickly and efficiently. ...read more.


The post-war Agricultural Credits Act funded 12 banks to offer loans to any farmers working co-operatively. However, the Act ultimately meant more smaller farmers became in debt. The larger farmers who could afford the loans squeezed the small farmers out of the market. Prohibition made farmer's problems even worse by cutting the need for grain previously used in alcohol. Ultimately, America's unequal distribution of wealth should have signalled to the government that its capitalist system was not working - and steps should have been taken to alleviate the imbalanced spending power. Because the government did not alleviate the situation, the divide grew bigger (making these people dependent on credit / loans, which they couldn't repay because of their lack of employment) - making the economy more fragile and unstable. Therefore, in October 1929, when a massive amount of selling began in the New York Stock Exchange, a mad panic set in. The confidence bubble had burst - triggered by a few rumours and fears that the market was going to crash. Had the government not pursued such a laissez faire approach to the management and regulation of banking and business, and had it responded earlier to the rich / poor divide in American society, the Wall Street Crash would never have happened because there would not have been such over-inflated / false confidence; there would have been foreign markets to trade with; and banks, businesses and individuals would have been regulated and acting in the interest of long-term not short-term gains. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 essays

  1. Reasons for the Wall Street Crash of 1929.

    Investors assuming the Great Bull market would go on forever. There was a collective delusion, or a belief on the part of all parties that home prices would keep rising forever, no matter how high or how fast they had already gone up, and an obscure accounting rule called mark-to-market,

  2. How far do you agree with this description of the prosperity of the USA ...

    faire policy with the economy of minimal interference and letting the banks regulate themselves and letting the economy run its course. They believed if the did not interfere in people's lives then they would be free to make money.

  1. How far do you agree with the view that the Wall Street crash was ...

    can also be accounted for having an impact on the Great Depression. Whilst there was strengths in the economy from the Bull Market causing a rapid economic growth, and easy credit and speculation leading to a consumer boom, and credit being easy accessible, factors which seemed to appear as a

  2. How far do you agree with the view that the Wall Street crash was ...

    the boom, had much more responsibility for the economic depression compared to the Stock market crash. In 1929, American farmers' annual income stood at an average of $273 a year, well below the national average of $750 and their hard times as well as lack of purchasing power was an important factor.

  1. Evaluate the view that overproduction of goods was the most important reason for the ...

    In addition the introduction of Prohibition meant that there was less need for grain, hence farmers had more products left over. The introduction of tractors led to improved farming methods and even more food being produced. During the 20s 30% of the population lived in rural America and their income

  2. To what extent was Hitler's foreign policy consistent and planned?

    The latter of the two suggestions may seem a little far-fetched when coupled with the issue of the Soviet Union, however, it is not to be discarded when assessing whether infact German foreign policy was planned and consistent. Having withdrawn in October 1933 from the League of Nations and the

  1. To what extent was the loss in confidence the main cause of the Wall ...

    The stock exchange, due to brokers selling techniques offered just the opportunity. Media encouragement was the popular press using their articles and papers to encourage readers to save $15 a month, to invest in stock, allow dividends to grow and by the end of 21 years they would have at least $80,000.

  2. How Far Do You Agree That The Impact Of World War 2 Was The ...

    Brown vs Board of Education (1954) where the clause from Plessy vs Ferguson stating that facilities must be ?separate but equal? was overturned.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work