• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Have powers from outside the Middle East helped or hindered In the search for a resolution to the Arab-Israeli conflict since 1948? Explain your answer

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Felicity Briggs Modern World Assignment: The Arab Israeli Conflict Question 1 Have powers from outside the Middle East helped or hindered In the search for a resolution to the Arab-Israeli conflict since 1948? Explain your answer Since 1948 many outside powers have tried to resolve the Arab-Israeli conflict. This is because the Arab Israeli conflict became very violent at the time and a number of outside powers were involved including the UN, America, Britain, Germany, France and Norway. As well as wanted to help resolve conflict many of these countries has their own interests/motives at heart. For instance America didn't want conflict to continue as it was putting a strain on the amount of oil imported from the Arab countries. The actions of the outside powers can be divided into two categories; those actions that helped peace and those that inflamed conflict. The first time outside powers got involved and hindered peace within the relevant time span was in 1948 itself. ...read more.

Middle

In this case the outside powers hindered peace. The dispute continued for a number of years until the next major conflict between the two sides in 1967. This was called the Six Day War for obvious reasons. For the eleven years previous Israel had continued to build up its armed forces by purchasing supplies from Britain, France, the USA and West Germany. At the same time the Arabs were purchasing weapons from the USSR. This hindered peace greatly as the sides wouldn't have been able to fight to the extent they did if they hadn't been supplied with the weapons in the first place. As well as all the negative things the outside powers did they achieved a number of positive things. The Suez war stopped when the UN forced Israel along with Britain and France out of Suez. The UN troops then replaced these troops with their own peace-keeping force; In this case the UN helped peace. ...read more.

Conclusion

However from this point it become harder to define what helped peace and what hindered it. This was obviously supposed to be a step towards peace some people disagreed with them including people from both the Arab and Israeli groups. Although a Declaration of Principles was made and agreed by both sides conflict still continued after this as a result. Therefore it is hard to say whether the outside powers helped peace or not although there intention was obviously to solve the conflict. In conclusion I have found out that peace in the Arab Israeli conflict has been like a roller coaster. Although outside powers have tried to achieve peace, especially the UN, overall they have been a great hindrance to peace in the Middle East that seems to suggest that if Israel was not supplied with arms by the different countries and if America hadn't signed the Friendship treaty the conflict might be closer to being resolved. I believe that overall the outside powers hindered the Arab-Israeli conflict rather than achieving peace. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Arab-Israeli Conflict 1948-1996.

    This was due to the attendance of the PLO who were advising the Palestinian representatives what to do behind closed doors. The Israelis knew of this and disagreed to many of the Palestinians terms, making the bilateral an ineffective peace initiative.

  2. Why was the Six-day War of 1967 a Significant Turning Point in the History ...

    The Israelis were similarly pressured by the U.N. Ultimately; Israel was forced to withdraw from the Sinai and Gaza Strip. This led to the U.N. placing a peace keeping force on the Sinai and the Gaza strip. Even though there was no real victor it was felt that Israel had shown its military might.

  1. Both sides were merely pursuing their legitimate interests. This was the crux-and the tragedy-of ...

    The rise of Nasser in 1952 led to attempts to strengthen the Egyptian economy which served as a precursor to the nationalization of the Suez Canal as America changed their mind about funding the Aswan Dam project. Nonetheless, Nasser did it legally and issued adequate compensation.

  2. The Arab-Israeli conflict 1956, 1967 and 1973.

    and thus they, along with Israel, decided to make a joint attack on Egypt. This factor therefore led to great conflicts between the Arabs and Israelis. b) Choose one factor which you think was the most important in causing the war.

  1. Despite the Camp David agreement the conflict between the Arabs and the Israelis has ...

    and so they had an ulterior reason to persevere in their influencing upon Israel to make peace. This is a reason why the conflict is still going on because Israel resents America's change of loyalties and game plan. They were used to unconditional support from America and felt pushed into a corner when they were unexpectedly put under pressure.

  2. The Arab Israeli Conflict -

    The only way left for us is war. I will have the pleasure and honour to save Palestine" - King Abdullah of Transjordan- 1948. The international reaction to the violence was one of disgust and disbelief, yet it was no surprise that the nations thought that Israel would be destroyed

  1. How significant was the presence of foreign powers as an influence on the nature ...

    Martin Kramer supports this by highlighting how young colonels, such as Nasser now wanted to ??propel the Arab world to unity, power and prosperity.??[6] The creation of the PLO in 1964 supports this by demonstrating the anti-imperialistic views Nasser wanted to implement, and by doing so, making his anti Zionist

  2. The USA played a much more significant role than the USSR in the Arab-Israeli ...

    At first, USSR's diplomatic support, arms from Czechoslovakia, part of the Soviet bloc, were crucial to Israel in the 1948 Arab-Israeli conflict. Throughout their War of independence, Soviet military aid from Czechoslovakia, consisting of 20,000 Czech rifles, 2,800 machine-guns and over 27 million rounds of ammunition by 1948 along with

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work