• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Have powers from outside the Middle East helped or hindered In the search for a resolution to the Arab-Israeli conflict since 1948? Explain your answer

Extracts from this document...


Felicity Briggs Modern World Assignment: The Arab Israeli Conflict Question 1 Have powers from outside the Middle East helped or hindered In the search for a resolution to the Arab-Israeli conflict since 1948? Explain your answer Since 1948 many outside powers have tried to resolve the Arab-Israeli conflict. This is because the Arab Israeli conflict became very violent at the time and a number of outside powers were involved including the UN, America, Britain, Germany, France and Norway. As well as wanted to help resolve conflict many of these countries has their own interests/motives at heart. For instance America didn't want conflict to continue as it was putting a strain on the amount of oil imported from the Arab countries. The actions of the outside powers can be divided into two categories; those actions that helped peace and those that inflamed conflict. The first time outside powers got involved and hindered peace within the relevant time span was in 1948 itself. ...read more.


In this case the outside powers hindered peace. The dispute continued for a number of years until the next major conflict between the two sides in 1967. This was called the Six Day War for obvious reasons. For the eleven years previous Israel had continued to build up its armed forces by purchasing supplies from Britain, France, the USA and West Germany. At the same time the Arabs were purchasing weapons from the USSR. This hindered peace greatly as the sides wouldn't have been able to fight to the extent they did if they hadn't been supplied with the weapons in the first place. As well as all the negative things the outside powers did they achieved a number of positive things. The Suez war stopped when the UN forced Israel along with Britain and France out of Suez. The UN troops then replaced these troops with their own peace-keeping force; In this case the UN helped peace. ...read more.


However from this point it become harder to define what helped peace and what hindered it. This was obviously supposed to be a step towards peace some people disagreed with them including people from both the Arab and Israeli groups. Although a Declaration of Principles was made and agreed by both sides conflict still continued after this as a result. Therefore it is hard to say whether the outside powers helped peace or not although there intention was obviously to solve the conflict. In conclusion I have found out that peace in the Arab Israeli conflict has been like a roller coaster. Although outside powers have tried to achieve peace, especially the UN, overall they have been a great hindrance to peace in the Middle East that seems to suggest that if Israel was not supplied with arms by the different countries and if America hadn't signed the Friendship treaty the conflict might be closer to being resolved. I believe that overall the outside powers hindered the Arab-Israeli conflict rather than achieving peace. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Why was the Six-day War of 1967 a Significant Turning Point in the History ...

    The Israelis were similarly pressured by the U.N. Ultimately; Israel was forced to withdraw from the Sinai and Gaza Strip. This led to the U.N. placing a peace keeping force on the Sinai and the Gaza strip. Even though there was no real victor it was felt that Israel had shown its military might.

  2. The Arab-Israeli conflict 1956, 1967 and 1973.

    Since Czechoslovakia was under the influence of the USSR and it was the main country to provide the Arab world with fighter planes, warships, bombers, tanks and guns, it was seen as though the USSR were directly providing help for the Arabs.

  1. The role of Saddam Hussain in serving the aims of America in the Middle ...

    Britain nearly succeeded in doing so. The Suez crisis, in which Britain openly took part, was the first war that London had staged in the Middle East since the Second World War in order to defend her influence and her interests.

  2. Have powers from outside the Middle East helped or hindered the search for a ...

    They introduced a Palestine partition to keep peace. In my opinion this was a very naive action because previous events had shown that many Arabs and Israelis had an 'all or nothing' view on the conflict and were not willing to compromise. Predictably, the division didn't work because the Jews provocatively called their part of the division Israel.

  1. The Arab Israeli Conflict -

    In July 1948, these were used to bomb the Egyptian capital, Cairo. The Arab nations didn't fight effectively, deciding to attack at different times rather than as one full army, and as a result, the Arab nations involved negotiated their own peace talks - a further sign that they were only united by their desire to attack Israel.

  2. The Arab-Israeli conflict.

    community, the USA would then contribute in the war on Britain's side. Balfour then sent a letter to the leading British Jew, Lord Rothschild, promising indefinable support for a 'national home' for the Jews in Palestine. This letter came to be known as the Balfour Declaration.

  1. Despite the Camp David agreement the conflict between the Arabs and the Israelis has ...

    The Israelis therefore became more adamantly against compromise and any deal they were pushed into was consequently hoax and had a chance of being short-lived. This factor could be thought of as a short-lived problem because America's support was, at the end of the day, conditional and so it could be considered a minor problem.

  2. How significant was the presence of foreign powers as an influence on the nature ...

    Martin Kramer supports this by highlighting how young colonels, such as Nasser now wanted to ??propel the Arab world to unity, power and prosperity.??[6] The creation of the PLO in 1964 supports this by demonstrating the anti-imperialistic views Nasser wanted to implement, and by doing so, making his anti Zionist

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work