• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Have powers from outside the Middle East helped or hindered the search for a resolution to the Arab-Israeli Conflict since 1948?

Extracts from this document...


Have powers from outside the Middle East helped or hindered the search for a resolution to the Arab-Israeli Conflict since 1948? Since 1948 many countries became involved in the conflict, namely Britain, France, the USA, Russia and the UN. One of the main reasons for this was oil in the Middle East and interest from France and Britain. The USA and Russia were involved because of the Cold War conflict. Britain's early actions didn't help peace as most agree that Britain's actions led to the 1948 War of Independence; and agreement with the Jews. When Britain needed help in WW1 the promised to help back the Jews and Arabs but the British could not satisfy both. In 1946 too many Jews were beginning to move in, as any Jew in the world was welcome. Britain decided to restrict Jewish entry, which was met by Jewish rioting. Attempting to bail out of a difficult situation, Britain asked the help of the UN and quickly pulled out, leaving behind a mess. Britain's next main incentive to get involved in the Middle East was the Suez Canal on the Mediterranean Sea. ...read more.


The UN suggested Israel give back the land it had gained but this was of course declined. But in 1973 the UN's main contribution to the peace came: they declared a ceasefire. An agreement was signed between Egypt and Israel and a peace-keeping force was sent to the area and also the Lebanon in the 1980s. This act of peace-keeping was a major redeeming feature in the UN's performance in the conflict. I think that previously, the UN's actions showed that they didn't understand the opinions on the conflict if the Arabs and Israelis, but a peace agreement was the right step to take in the search for peace. Russia was the main super-power that had an effect on the conflict. During the cold war Russia supplied Arab states with weapons which of course didn't encourage peace. When the Six Day War broke out, Russia sided with the Arabs and broke off diplomatic relations with Israel. Countries from outside taking sides caused problems in almost all cases in the conflict. Soon after the PLO was started, Russia backed the terrorism. ...read more.


An attempt to control peace amongst terrorist groups (mainly PLO) in 1983 went wrong when 146 were killed in an attack on their base in the Lebanon. After the Gulf War and the collapse of the Soviet Union, the USA was left with the most control over the conflict. President Clinton offered Yasser Arafat a deal which seemed too good be true (as mentioned in question 2) but he declined. To clear things up, Clinton brokers another agreement but Baruk loses an election and the new leader Sharon is swept to power. He is a violent man. To this day the USA has seemed biased towards the Israelis and most believe they were not forceful enough. All in all the USA has done the best job in the search for peace, mainly because of their control, but early on when Russia had similar control over the conflict, they acted very badly in trying to resolve the conflict. Britain's involvement wasn't as influential as the super-powers' but generally they were unhelpful and left a sticky situation to the UN. Other than the UN's poor decision to introduce a partition, they acted well and the ceasefire was an important step. Alex Hawthorne 11S 18 November 2002 History Coursework Mrs Allan ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Rationality, Educated Opinion and Peace

    work What is History he extends the role of reason to the capacity to reform: The primary function of reason, as applied to man in society, is no longer merely to investigate, but to transform; and this heightened consciousness of the power of men to improve the management of his

  2. Arab-Israeli Conflict 1948-1996.

    The multilateral track aimed to tackle more regional topics such as the environment, refugees, water etc. The multilateral track was not effective in solving the conflicts between the Arabs and Israelis as it did not concentrate on the real problems at hand.

  1. How far do you agree that Israeli victories in successive Arab-Israeli conflicts in the ...

    This helped the Israelis in their victories over the Arabs because of the dramatic increase in the population of Israel it meant that ore people could enlist in the army. The growth of the Israeli economy meant that more money could be spent on their defence which was a major reason for the victories in the Arab-Israeli Wars.

  2. Have powers from outside the Middle East helped or hindered In the search for ...

    This meant that the US supplied arms to the Israeli forces to fight against the Palestinians. I believe this hindered peace as it encouraged Jews to use physical violence against the Palestinians instead of trying to come up with a peaceful solution.

  1. The Arab-Israeli conflict 1956, 1967 and 1973.

    (9 marks) From the list of factors given, I consider that the Russian foreign policy was the most important in causing the wars in 1956, 1967 and 1973 between the Arab's and Israelis. During the Arab-Israeli conflict, the world's two greatest 'super-powers', USA and the USSR were in a cold war against each other.

  2. American History.

    Irish immigrants] rebelled against the provincial gov'ts b/c they felt they lacked influence and that the gov'ts were unfair. Prelude to a Revolution (1754 - 1774) *Changes in Colonial Outlook* - So how was it that the happy colonists changed their minds and, after over a century of peaceful subordination to Britain, began fighting for independence in 1776?

  1. Despite the Camp David agreement the conflict between the Arabs and the Israelis has ...

    Another factor that caused this change of opinion was the fact that America was still being criticised. They were accused of double standards after helping Kuwait in the Gulf War but merely 'sympathising' with the Palestinians. America needed to keep favour with the Arab states for reasons such as oil

  2. The Arab Israeli Conflict -

    because it was vulnerable, facing attack from Egypt, Lebanon and Iraq, all at the same time- "Powerful Arab interests, both inside and outside Palestine, are defying the resolution of the General Assembly and are engaged in a deliberate effort to alter by force the settlement envisaged therein".

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work