• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Have powers from outside the Middle East helped or hindered the search for a resolution to the Arab-Israeli Conflict since 1948?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Have powers from outside the Middle East helped or hindered the search for a resolution to the Arab-Israeli Conflict since 1948? Since 1948 many countries became involved in the conflict, namely Britain, France, the USA, Russia and the UN. One of the main reasons for this was oil in the Middle East and interest from France and Britain. The USA and Russia were involved because of the Cold War conflict. Britain's early actions didn't help peace as most agree that Britain's actions led to the 1948 War of Independence; and agreement with the Jews. When Britain needed help in WW1 the promised to help back the Jews and Arabs but the British could not satisfy both. In 1946 too many Jews were beginning to move in, as any Jew in the world was welcome. Britain decided to restrict Jewish entry, which was met by Jewish rioting. Attempting to bail out of a difficult situation, Britain asked the help of the UN and quickly pulled out, leaving behind a mess. Britain's next main incentive to get involved in the Middle East was the Suez Canal on the Mediterranean Sea. ...read more.

Middle

The UN suggested Israel give back the land it had gained but this was of course declined. But in 1973 the UN's main contribution to the peace came: they declared a ceasefire. An agreement was signed between Egypt and Israel and a peace-keeping force was sent to the area and also the Lebanon in the 1980s. This act of peace-keeping was a major redeeming feature in the UN's performance in the conflict. I think that previously, the UN's actions showed that they didn't understand the opinions on the conflict if the Arabs and Israelis, but a peace agreement was the right step to take in the search for peace. Russia was the main super-power that had an effect on the conflict. During the cold war Russia supplied Arab states with weapons which of course didn't encourage peace. When the Six Day War broke out, Russia sided with the Arabs and broke off diplomatic relations with Israel. Countries from outside taking sides caused problems in almost all cases in the conflict. Soon after the PLO was started, Russia backed the terrorism. ...read more.

Conclusion

An attempt to control peace amongst terrorist groups (mainly PLO) in 1983 went wrong when 146 were killed in an attack on their base in the Lebanon. After the Gulf War and the collapse of the Soviet Union, the USA was left with the most control over the conflict. President Clinton offered Yasser Arafat a deal which seemed too good be true (as mentioned in question 2) but he declined. To clear things up, Clinton brokers another agreement but Baruk loses an election and the new leader Sharon is swept to power. He is a violent man. To this day the USA has seemed biased towards the Israelis and most believe they were not forceful enough. All in all the USA has done the best job in the search for peace, mainly because of their control, but early on when Russia had similar control over the conflict, they acted very badly in trying to resolve the conflict. Britain's involvement wasn't as influential as the super-powers' but generally they were unhelpful and left a sticky situation to the UN. Other than the UN's poor decision to introduce a partition, they acted well and the ceasefire was an important step. Alex Hawthorne 11S 18 November 2002 History Coursework Mrs Allan ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. The Arab-Israeli conflict 1956, 1967 and 1973.

    After an Israeli tractor ploughed Syrian land and was opened fire on to, the Israelis' air force bombed the Syrian guns and shot down six Syrian fighter planes sent to attack them. The USSR, being a close ally of the Arabs and Syria in particular, stepped in when Israel threatened

  2. The Prelude to the 1975 War and the Cairo Agreement.

    By Israeli estimates, only thirty of those killed were terrorists. For ten days, the PLO then unleashed artillery fire against the upper Galilee. Although only six Israeli citizens were killed, many Israelis were shocked and stunned by the PLO's capability to sustain such an attack.

  1. The role of Saddam Hussain in serving the aims of America in the Middle ...

    However America in her first open intervention in the region since the 1940s foiled this attack and forced France, Britain and Israel to withdraw completely from the lands and the territorial waters of Egypt. Part of the pressure exerted on Britain specifically in order to force her to withdraw from

  2. American History.

    Besides his beliefs in a simple, limited central gov't, Jefferson called for unity in his First Inaugural Address. - In reality, though, Jefferson was consolidating the DRs hold on power by refusing to recognize appointments Adams made in the last days of his presidency and by placing DR's in vacant seats formerly held by Federalists.

  1. The Arab Israeli Conflict -

    A famous, but gruesome example of Israeli dictatorship was in the destruction of Deir Yassin, on the 10th April 1948, where 132 Zionist terrorists killed 250 men, women and children in the village. "The Jews used machine guns, then grenades and finished of with knives.

  2. The Arab-Israeli conflict.

    Another reading of the Balfour Declaration is that it was to make sure familiarity was dependable with any country around the Suez Canal. After the First World War Jews and Arabs were subjected to dissatisfaction as independence was not positive, instead it developed into a 'mandated territory.'

  1. Have powers from outside the Middle East helped or hindered In the search for ...

    This meant that the US supplied arms to the Israeli forces to fight against the Palestinians. I believe this hindered peace as it encouraged Jews to use physical violence against the Palestinians instead of trying to come up with a peaceful solution.

  2. Despite the Camp David agreement the conflict between the Arabs and the Israelis has ...

    and so they had an ulterior reason to persevere in their influencing upon Israel to make peace. This is a reason why the conflict is still going on because Israel resents America's change of loyalties and game plan. They were used to unconditional support from America and felt pushed into a corner when they were unexpectedly put under pressure.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work