• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Henry V is presented as a strong and capable King. Is this an accurate description of Shakespeare's Henry V?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Henry V is presented as a strong and capable King. Is this an accurate description of Shakespeare's Henry V? Henry V, the son of Henry IV, received the crown after his father's death in 1413. Before Henry received the crown he had a very wild youth, he was outgoing and naturally strong, he liked drinking and parties and got himself quite a bad reputation. People began to criticise Henry when he became Prince of Wales in 1399, because of his gambling ways and the way he took advantage of being Prince and also people said he would never make a good king. But their opinions changed and so did Henry when he became King of England. In the play, Henry V shows himself to be a king who is both fool hardy and domineering. He ignores problems within his own country in order to expand his empire and thus his wealth in France. He was a man who took extreme risks and was fortunate that these risks did not bring his downfall and disaster to England. He may be seen as a common man. Fool hardy and impetuous as a youth, he appears to have been unable to cast-off these dubious personality traits. It is more appropriate to describe Henry V as more suited to be a soldier than to be a king. In battle he is valiant, his motivational skills to rallying his men to fight the French, against remarkable odds, are an inspiration to any military man. ...read more.

Middle

The whole matter could have easily been dealt by Exeter, but once again Henry is shown to be almost foolhardy in taking the matter into his own hands. Henry can also be seen as calculating and cold. In act III, Henry shows his capabilities as a military commander. He is aware that war is cruel and that in battle it is necessary to, "imitate the action of the tiger." Henry warns the governor of, Harfleur, of the dangers that will follow if the town is seized by force. Henry fears that the soldiers will no longer be under his control. It is clear therefore that even as a general Henry has weaknesses and fears that his men are not truly as well disciplined as they should be. Henry also commits two acts that appear to be inconsistent with good judgment as King. First he informs Exeter to, "Use mercy to them all." This is an extremely dangerous decision; by not punishing them Henry may leave himself open to attack by these very people. Henry also prevents his troops from robbing and attacking the French from his journey to Agincourt, in doing this he shows considerable compassion, in act III scene VI "...in our marches through the country, there be nothing compelled from the villages, nothing taken but paid for, none of the French upbraided or abused in disdainful language; for when lenity and cruelty play for a kingdom, the gentle gamester is the soonest winner." ...read more.

Conclusion

British losses we are expected to believe four titled men and, "of all other men but five and twenty." It seems that Shakespeare was inferring that the battle was comic and its outcome even more comic. Such a victory shows that either the French incompetent and unbelievably stupid or the British were nearly invincible. Finally in the epilogue, Shakespeare through the chorus reminds us that the succeeding king, "Lost France and made his England bleed..." line 12, epilogue. This shows the futility of the acts of Henry V. Because he won in France, the British may see Henry V as a hero. This victory should also be viewed against the motivations in going to war. Henry's naivety and inability to make decisions is shown when he approached Canterbury on the merits of his claim to the French throne. A strong and decisive leader would not require the help of men who obviously would have a vested interest in the outcome. As a youth, Henry was hot-headed and strong willed. The decision to invade France in order to further his claim shows that he has changed little. The act of placing British into a battle, where they were outnumbered five to one, is an appalling fact. Henry's poor judgment and his failure to settle problems within England are unforgettable. In short, the British should be appalled by such a king, there is little doubt his impetuosity could very well have caused even greater problems to Britain. Becca Moss ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. What kind of king does Shakespeare create in Act 3 Scenes 1 and 2? ...

    "Called and choice - drawn cavaliers", here the prologue describes the soldiers as being specially picked gallant young men. Strength and power are also represented in the prologue: "pith/puissance". By speaking of his men in this way, Shakespeare is portraying Henry as being self-assured and confident in himself as a king and his men.

  2. Explore the Nature of Kingship In "Henry V".

    Henry is also viewed as a very religious king. Henry himself tells us how he views him self as a religious man "We are no tyrant but a Christian king". Henry always believes that God is on his side in his claims and in battle. "But this all lies within the will of god".

  1. Henry V Character Analysis

    His consistency and loyalty to the battle again show his dedication to his own nation as well as its causes as he declares that he "would not wish himself anywhere but where he is", thus revealing wholehearted support for the battle.

  2. Shakespeare Portrays Henry V as the Model Monarch

    In the morning the French nobles, full of confidence, leave their camp for the Battlefield. They comment about the English saying there are not enough to give them a decent battle & they worry that the English will be so overwhelmed by the French they will surrender without a fight

  1. How do the poets in 'Charlotte O'Neils song' and 'Nothing Changed' show their feelings ...

    They were also able to earn a lot more than in England. 'Nothing's Changed' is a far more angry poem. Whereas the girl in the first poem is able to make a change to the way she is treated, the second poem seems to suggest that although things have changed politically, society is still divided.

  2. Meddling and troublesome(TM)- how accurate a description is this of Elizabeth I(TM)s parliaments?

    However, by the time of her next Parliament in 1566 they appeared to be somewhat troubled by her lack of action concerning her marriage (especially in light of her episode of smallpox during which it was feared she would die and leave England without an heir that was desirable to

  1. Shakespeare: Richard II, Henry IV and Henry V

    Lest child, child's children cry against thee woe'. Carlisle's words find an echo in Henry V when Henry pronounces 'and some are yet ungotten and unborn that shall have cause to curse the Dauphin's scorn'. In Henry IV Part I, we find the fulfilment of Carlisle's awful prophecy.

  2. Wives & War: To what extent did these two aspects undermine Henry VIIIs rule ...

    Anne of Cleves herself was never flatted by diplomats with regards of her beauty, even Henry?s own court painter Holbein commented only on her ?honesty? (Bingham 2011, pg 81), she was regarded as being quite uneducated and seemed not to enjoy the pleasures that Henry most admired, a somewhat imperfect

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work