Henry VII and His Money.

Authors Avatar

STUDY UNIT 2 - HENRY VII AND HIS MONEY

INTENTION 

In the last Study Unit we saw something of Henry Tudor's hard struggle and the eventual outstanding success of his attempt at ruling the country he won in battle. As you can no doubt imagine, it was no easy business continually fighting off rivals and securing himself on the throne. In this Study Unit we will consider how it was that Henry, after arriving on the throne in debt, could leave a vast fortune to his son. The great wealth that Henry accumulated was both a reflection and a cause of his strength, and on the strength of the throne the peace and prosperity of the country rested to a large extent. If we see how Henry accumulated so much money and how he manipulated and spent it, we should get some clues as to the causes of his success. Later we will see what his son, Henry VIII, did with this wealth and the undisputed throne left to him.

PRESENTATION 

Henry Tudor and kingship.
In this section we will see the sources from which Henry was able to get-money, and some of the ways he used it to administer the country and strengthen the throne0 We will also see that the means Henry used to accumulate this wealth were occasionally unscrupulous and unjust0 You might wonder why it was that a man Like- Henry Tudor would risk his life to win a throne, and then spend a further twenty-four years of hard relentless work strengthening it and administering England. From the glimpse we can get of the- man across the years you might feel that someone like Henry Tudor, who was ready to be so unscrupulous to increase his fortunes, was hardly the sort to work so hard simply for the benefit of his subjects.

In a way we can see in this a reason for the success of kingship in those turbulent times Kingship was able to harness the greed, lust for power and abilities of a tough man like Henry Tudor to give peace and prosperity to a kingdom. If the man who took on himself the kingship was strong enough he would be able to hold onto the throne and destroy all rival claimants, and so provide eventual peace0 His success would attract the support of those elements in the kingdom who wanted peace and stability, and that support would further act to strengthen the King and would further act to strengthen the King and make his success more likely. Once settled, the King who was greedy for personal wealth had first to make his country and its citizens wealthy. So again we see how even the worst characteristics of the man who was King could work to the good of the country. In such ways the interests of King and subjects coincided. Not, of course, that Henry was such a paragon of all vices - though neither was he ever in danger of rivalling Edward the Confessor's achievement of canonization - but you can perhaps see how it was that even those qualities we tend to disapprove of today in our society could be valuable in providing good government for the country.

In Italy at this time there was a man called Niccolo Machiavelli who was shortly to write a book which was to become one of the most famous or notorious of its time. Machiavelli was an Italian diplomat and politician, and he dedicated this book The Prince to Lorenzo the Magnificent. In The Prince, Machiavelli argues that for a ruler the only 'good' is to strengthen his throne and his kingdom. Conventional notions of what is morally good or bad, honest or dishonest, he says are irrelevant to the ruler. By Machiavelli's standards, then, Henry VII would be considered an almost perfect ruler, pursuing the interests of the throne and country before those of morality pr justice. But you might feel that the world would be better if Kings, princes and politicians adhered to a higher standard of political morality than Machiavelli suggests for them. As was suggested in Study Unit 1, the kingship which Henry Tudor took upon himself was of itself powerful.

Join now!

The whole of English society was organized in such a way that the King was at the centre of all political, social and legal activity. If there were times in the past when English kingship seemed weak it was because weak men sat on the throne; men who were incapable of managing the powers that were attached to the position, and who were unable to control subjects who tried to usurp various powers which belonged to it. Every strong ruler tried to regain control over the patronage which weak predecessors had lost. Thus Henry VII spent time and energy on ...

This is a preview of the whole essay