• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Henry VIII was a conservative, but the results of his policies were revolutionary" Discuss this statement in relation to English government policies in the 1530's.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Henry VIII was a conservative, but the results of his policies were revolutionary" Discuss this statement in relation to English government policies in the 1530's. Henry was a supreme egotist. He advanced personal desires under the guise of public policy or moral right, forced his ministers to pay extreme penalties for his own mistakes, and summarily executed many with little excuse. In his later years he became grossly fat, paranoid, and unpredictable. Nonetheless he possessed considerable political insight, and he provided England with a visible and active national leader. Although Henry seemed to dominate his Parliaments, the importance of that institution increased significantly during his reign. Other advances made during his reign were the institution of an effective navy and the beginnings of social and religious reform. The navy was organized for the first time as a permanent force. Wales was officially incorporated into England in 1536 with a great improvement in government administration there. In 1521, Henry had been given the title "Defender of the Faith" by the pope for a treatise against Martin Luther, and he remained orthodox in his personal doctrinal views throughout his reign. Even though the rest of Europe was going through a reformation/renaissance Henry VIII kept a traditional yet modern monarchy. ...read more.

Middle

Ultimately, he was a victim of his times. The 16th century was a confusing mess of changing loyalties, betrayals, near-constant fighting, and most importantly, a rising scepticism of that great institution of the fading medieval world, the Roman Catholic Church. With the advent of the printing press a century before, literacy and intellectual debate grew rapidly. The High Renaissance in Italy occurred during the first 20 years of Henry VIII's reign. It was a time of unparalleled scientific experiment, intellectual fervour, and spirited debate. In such a time, traditional views of kingship were bound to change for both the ruler and those he ruled. So from an early age it is apparent that he does posses conservative views. Cromwell's reforms actually made the Tudor state more powerful "but this advance was weakened by minority" Henry did his best, before his death, to set up a Privy Council which he could trust to guide and inform his young heir. He chose advisors who were closest to him to take on the task, and by doing this hoped to avoid any emerging power struggles. Henry wanted all members to have equal power and thought that they should govern until Edward reached the age of eighteen. ...read more.

Conclusion

Other historians such as Joel Hurstfield and John Guy, both argue (bravely against Elton) that parliaments power did not increase and the roles of parliament didn't change. They back up their statement by saying that Cromwell basically held parliament in "contempt" to be used to pass laws that Henry told them to do. To some extent parliament didn't exist as a mainframe in Government as Henry created a Privy Council of those he trusted. My opinions lye towards arguing with Elton because Henry VIII's reign was revolutionary due to major changes in European policy and English policy. Once separated from Rome, Henry could see his sovereignty over the people. Which brought back sovereignty, which is party of a conservative monarchy re-instating power over the masses. Elton's theory is not one that should be ignored as it does prove to be significant when studying a mixed view subject. I believe that is some elements of Henry's reign his ministers were more powerful than himself and perhaps his ministers were controlling the country at one point, but overall Henry disposed of the powerful ministers, Wolsey, was used as a scapegoat when Henry wanted a divorce, this caused ex-communication from Rome and Cromwell abused his position and was punished for it. Henry, once again showing Sovereignty and diminishing Elton's theory. George Carter 7/5/07 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Was Anne Boleyn or Thomas Cromwell the more influential in bringing religious reform in ...

    This was rather inconvenient, as, although several ways existed for the marriage to be terminated (among them, Catherine could have become a nun, a suggestion which she greeted with the response that she would be glad to do so if Henry would become a monk; Henry could have arranged for

  2. Constitutional Nationalism succeeded in achieving its aims whereas revolutionary nationalism failed and cultural nationalism ...

    Another of the successes of the Fenians was the spreading of their message through their newspaper, the Irish people. Also, according to Russell Rees "in many towns the Fenian movement played a prominent role in the organisation of a variety of social and recreational pastimes, and this aspect alone may have been sufficient to attract interested members."

  1. King Henry VIII.

    But More soon discovered that Henry found it easy to keep his enjoyment of learned conversation apart from the conduct of policy. Nothing for the moment could dent Wolsey's strength, and this had serious drawbacks for the King, who supported him.

  2. Gladstone's Government. Unpopular foreign policies, popular domestic policies. How far do you agree with ...

    This act was arguably Gladstone's most successful piece of Irish legislation and it united all of the Liberals (a rare occurrence!). However, despite uniting the Liberal party, the bill caused acrimony between the House of Commons and House of Lords and Queen Victoria was forced to personally intervene to help get the bill passed.

  1. This essay examines the actions of Charles VII in relation to events pertaining to ...

    Wheeler, Bonnie & Charles T. Wood. Fresh Verdicts on Joan of Arc. New York: Garland Publishing, Inc., 1996. A collection of essays from well regarded scholars on the topic of Joan of Arc including Kelly Devries and Jane Marie Pinzino.

  2. How far did Henry VIII persue new foreign policies during the period 1509-1514?

    Henry's uncle, Jasper Tudor, was the only constant figure in his life, and always gave Henry stability, loyalty and a political role model. Henry VII fought for the crown, against the Yorkist king Richard III, at the Battle of Bosworth.

  1. The changing position of women and the suffrage question. Revision notes

    * Sylvia Pankhurst however, became an increasingly vocal critic of the war and supported conscientious objectors. The ELFS changed its name to the Workers Suffrage Federation in 1916 and by 1918 it had become the Women?s Socialist Federation. * The Women?s Dreadnought became the Workers Dreadnought The NUWSS * Most

  2. Wives & War: To what extent did these two aspects undermine Henry VIIIs rule ...

    Henry went to war for his own and national interests, conclusively victory in any war brings about vast rewards and brings about stability in political matters; however did Henry?s involvement with France and Scotland undermine his rule any way at all?

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work