• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

History Coursework - How useful are sources A, B and C in explaining why the USA become involved in Vietnam?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History Coursework - How useful are sources A, B and C in explaining why the USA become involved in Vietnam? Each of these sources gives us some insight into why the USA became involved in the Vietnamese war. However, whilst the sources can be useful on one hand they all have their limitations. Source A is taken from a speech that was delivered by President Johnson in April 1965. Source B is part of a private conversation between President Johnson and an unknown person in May of 1964. The last source, source C is lifted from an interview which Noam Chomsky is being interviewed in October 1982. The first source I will examine is Source A. This is helpful in giving us an idea of what President Johnson wanted the American public to believe about the war that they were fighting in, like the reasons for the USA becoming involved in a matter that was so far away from home. He states that one of the reasons for this was that the USA had a promise to keep. This is made clear as he says "we fight because we have a promise to keep" in the speech. ...read more.

Middle

What makes this source more reliable than the others is that it is a private conversation. This indicates that Johnson never intended for what he was saying to be leaked to the media or the public, so what he is saying is surely true as there'd be no need for him to lie. He also sounds informal in the way he is speaking, using colloquial language, for example the word 'damn' is used in one sentence. On the other hand this source has it's limitations as well. He states that he thinks it is not possible to fight the war in Vietnam as it is so far. This is untrue; he knows they can fight the war as he has sent thousands of troops to Vietnam along with US marines and chemical and other weapons. In a way this makes the source unreliable. Source C, the final source, is the only one of the three sources that is not spoken or delivered by President Johnson. It is taken from Noam Chomsky being interviewed in October 1982. Within in this source Chomsky puts forward what he believes are the real reasons for America becoming involved in Vietnam in the first place. ...read more.

Conclusion

Source B displays President Johnson's personal views about the situation in hand. This helps us clarify two things; one - how the President personally felt about what was happening in Vietnam, and two - that President Johnson was either lying in his speech of April 1965, or he drastically changed his views about Vietnam between the time of his speech and the time of the private conversation. Source C gives us unofficial reasons for America's involvement; this is unlikely to be biased about the reasons as he was not involved in the war, meaning he has no motive for lying about them. This makes the source quite reliable, in some ways more so than the other two. Although, Source C does miss out some vital details and doesn't mention a word about Communism, which is the main reason America became involved, not one of the sources mention anything about the policy of containment or the Truman doctrine, which makes them less useful because no opinions about these policies are shown. Overall, I would say theses sources give us some insight into why the USA became involved with Vietnam, however this insight is limited. We are not given the whole story or full reasoning behind the USA's involvement. In some ways Historians would find these sources useful but not explicit enough. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Dtente, meaning and definition.

    Irrelevance of the military Alliances: Military alliances like SEATO, CENTO had already faded away. Remaining active and potent alliances like NATO and Warsaw Pact also lost their relevance after November 1990. The heads of 34 NATO and Warsaw Pact nations, assembled at a historic summit in Paris on November 10,

  2. 1920's USA.

    to the time when people were highly suspicious of immigrants and hence Attorney-General Palmer ordered for many suspected socialists to be deported. But this is not very clear. Also the line that says that everybody was content is not very true.

  1. Use the sources and your knowledge of American history to explain why there has ...

    This shows that FDR was right in the extra power that he gave the executive branch, because the situation required the President to have such a role. In addition, Source B heavily supports FDR in the way that he governed the country, and supports the policies that he introduced.

  2. How Useful are Sources A-C to explain why the United States became involved in ...

    But he yet wasn't willing to do this. Johnson and his advisors believed that further air attacks, if needed, would be enough to bring Victory. The source then goes on to says "Since 1945 every American president has offered support to the people of South Vietnam" This links to the

  1. Hiroshima Coursework This piece of coursework will concentrate on three questions, all source based.

    This is not at all surprising that Truman does not state it was wrong for the bomb to be dropped. This source contradicts with source E. Source G is from an interview made in 1963 with Saburo Hayashi, secretary to the Japanese War Minister in 1945.

  2. 3 presidents

    This was seen as barbaric and Wilson believed this was a breach of standard warfare 'rules'. Germans sank the 'Lusitania'. Of the 1200 that died, 128 were American! In 1916, the Sussex was sunk. Wilson threatened the Germans and made it clear that if American lives were endangered, there would be consequences.

  1. How Useful are Sources A to C to Explain Why the United States Became ...

    Americans also 'feared that South Vietnam might be able to reform and improve itself'. America also feared that Vietnam may 'develop its economy'. The US did not want anyone to build up their economy as Americas wanted to be world's supreme power.

  2. The aim of this essay is to evaluate if the end of the Cold ...

    explaining events such as the dissolution of the Soviet Union and the Berlin Wall fall, their theory is able to explain these event (Blair et al, 2009 p.21-22). Between the years 1947 -1991, the world experienced the struggle by two fundamental opposing systems; the socialist communism and liberal democracy.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work