• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

history unit 4 Germany's attack on Poland in September 1939 was the main reason for Britain's decision to declare war on Germany.' How far do you agree with this judgement?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

(F2) 'Germany's attack on Poland in September 1939 was the main reason for Britain's decision to declare war on Germany.' How far do you agree with this judgement? When Hitler sent the German army to invade Poland on September 1st 1939 he had pushed his luck just one step too far. This advance on Poland was what caused Britain's and France's tolerance to snap, a tolerance that Germany had been stretching and antagonising for some years already. To simply say that Germany's attack on Poland was the reason for declaring war would be extremely foolish. Such a cataclysmic decision like this was rather the result of years experiencing immense threat and repeated broken promises from Hitler not to mention the genuine attempt to appease him in order to avert war. There were those politicians like Churchill who had been calling for war against Hitler ever since he became Chancellor in January 1933 and even less extreme politicians such as Ernest Bevin, Labour MP, who said as early as in March 1937 that "From the day Hitler came to power, I have felt that the democratic countries would have to face war." As historians looking back with hindsight we could even say that from the moment the Allies signed the Treaty of Versailles in the immediate aftermath of the First World War, Europe was on a 20 year crash course towards another major scale war. ...read more.

Middle

Britain was finally ready for fighting a war. For the first time since they started to disarm post WW1, Britain had a reasonable military capability and now was able to commit itself to fighting Germany. The army was by no means at its full strength and the first three years of the war were spent expanding and reinforcing the army. Britain had strongly advocated disarmament right through the 1920's and much of the 1930's and it was only when Chamberlain became PM in 1937 and foresaw the possibility of war on the near horizon did he start to genuinely rearm the country to be ready for a war. Even though Britain ideologically would have taken Germany to war over the Sudetenland crises, they were forced to appease rather than fight due to their military incapability. Chamberlain was cornered and took last ditch action to fly out and meet with Hitler and fellow European leaders in Munich. Once the war started Chamberlain admitted that at the time he knew that war was a certainty but what he achieved at Munich was to buy Britain an extra year to rearm itself. Now that Britain was ready to fight it was a culmination of a number of events in 1939 that eventually led to the brake out war on 1st September. ...read more.

Conclusion

However, even these strong feeling were uprooted in the dying inter-war years and British public opinion swayed after the Sudeten crises. A poll taken in 1935 showed that 92.5% of Britons asked, were in favour of an all round reduction in armaments however in June 1939, 84% answered yes to a poll asking whether they would like to see a military alliance between the Allies in order to fight Germany. In conclusion, although Germany's attack on Poland in September 1939 was the immediate trigger to World War Two it was by no means the cause or reason that Britain promptly declared war on Germany. This attack on Poland merely signified the appropriate and opportune time for Britain to retaliate towards a country that had been dangling war before the British eyes for some time already. It was only then in September 1939 did all the many other factors fall into place and the country was ready to fight. Military incapability up to this point as well as the strong desire to avoid conflict and rectify the situation through appeasement had been some of the reasons why it took up to this point for war to erupt. The fed-up feeling of being lied to by Hitler time and time again over the previous four years and a swing in public opinion in support of war meant that now Britain was finally ready to fight. Poland was just a good excuse. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The impact of the First World War merely heightened existing social and political tensions ...

    4 star(s)

    democracy- as opposed to something that the Kaiser wanted as an autocracy. The tensions increased with further political events as the constitution wasn't clear in terms of their political structure, which was dominated by the conservative elites. Another political tension that occurred before the war includes the Zabern affair which was seen as a political crisis.

  2. Vietnam war

    * By January 1961, the number of advisors had grown to 685. They trained the ARVN in the use of conventional weapons. Partnership 1961-1963: * 1961- JFK sought "limited partnership" with Diem, flexible response, counterinsurgency, nation-building, reform without revolution * 1962- MAAG (Truman's Military Advisory and Assistance Group)

  1. How far do you agree that the main reason for Hitler coming to power ...

    However to a larger extent the failure of the Weimar constitution paved a way from the very beginning for a number of extreme parties to make their mark upon German society, including the Nazis. The Weimar constitution meant a system where many parties could get involved, resulting in large coalitions.

  2. Why did war break out in Europe 1939

    However these points still do not justify the Appeasement. It encourages Hitler to be aggressive as each gable gave him confidence to take a bigger risk. It also gave time for Germany's army to grow strong. In hindsight we can see that the Germany army was growing much stronger than the British or French one.

  1. Hitlers Germany

    And that appeal can scarcely be made by any writer. Only the orator can hope to make it.' As an orator Hitler had obvious faults. The timbre of his voice was harsh, very different from the beautiful quality of Goebbels's.

  2. To what extent did the increase in the persecution of witches in Europe from ...

    The unpleasant synthesis of these causes required only what historians Scarre and Callow call the ?catalyst? of Religion, creating an atmosphere of suspicion and hatred which allowed witchcraft trials to flourish. The fact that so many different factors took part in the fear and desperation which led to the ?witch

  1. Albert Speers Role as German Armaments Minister during the War

    However he ?denied all knowledge of, and personal involvement in, The Final Solution?[11]. Speer was found guilty on the last two counts and was sentenced to 20 years in prison. While in prison Speer endeavoured to write his memoirs in an attempt to explain his actions and motives.

  2. Their use of terror was the main reason that the Nazis retained control in ...

    Additionally, ?Hitler Youth? embraced a range of youth groups to enrol on organisations to develop and brainwash the younger generation under Nazi ideology and by 1939 membership became compulsory. This alone shows that Hitler tried to indoctrinate everyone in society, including the younger generation for the future Nazi Germany showing how this led to the Nazi?s retained control.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work