• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Holocaust Denial

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

David Irving has claimed that the Holocaust was a "hoax" and that there were no gas chambers in Auschwitz; discuss the evidence for and against this claim. "One is astonished in the study of history at the recurrence of the idea that evil must be forgotten, distorted, skimmed over. The difficulty, of course, with this philosophy is that history loses its value as an incentive and example; it paints perfect men and noble nations, but it does not tell the truth." -W.E.B Du Bois, Black Reconstruction, 1935. There could not be a more appropriate account to go with the debate between Holocaust deniers, and those who see it as a genuine event in history. From our mid teens we are taught about the events that occurred under Hitler's reign, the most horrific of those being the mass genocide of an estimated eleven million people, many of which Jews, during the Holocaust. It is also taught that the most famous extermination camp existed at Auschwitz, where up to 10'000 people were exterminated per day. These are exactly the kind of facts that were presented to me during school, and to many others; some individuals, however, claim that this horrific event never took place. Those who claim the Holocaust did not appear as traditional history describes, believe that "the current mainstream understanding of the Holocaust is the result of a deliberate Jewish conspiracy created to advance the interest of Jews at the expense of other nations." ...read more.

Middle

But that the "Holocaust - the alleged extermination of some six million Jews (most of them by gassing) - is a hoax and should be recognized as such by Christians and all informed, honest and truthful men everywhere." More than being just a pro-Nazi viewpoint, Holocaust deniers believe that the death-toll amount which is widely accepted is a falsehood in an attempt to get more compensation, and sympathy. It is believed that the interest of the Zionist movement is to augment the amount of Holocaust deaths so that their gains will be greater. (5) The Holocaust deniers maintain that the Holocaust is a myth in order to establish the possibilities which can occur when an individual or group of people try to play God. This claim may have resulted from various factors, and in many cases of a denial, a particular political agenda backs it up, along with their own personal beliefs colouring their view. To fully understand the claims of these people, both sides of the debate must be looked at. The case which acknowledges the Holocaust as it is presented has much more convincing evidence, the most notable of which being photographs, video footage and personal accounts. Where the Holocaust deniers get their supposed evidence from however, is the jigsaw in which the evidence which shows the Holocaust as the event we're taught it to be is made up of. ...read more.

Conclusion

Of course, the issue which arises with both of these claims, and history as a whole, is that unless someone is actually present at an event and experiencing something, they have no way of knowing exactly what went on during a given time and date. It is for these reasons which we need to rely on sources other than ourselves to understand the past, and a primary source is the most reliable place to look first. Talking with a Holocaust survivor, reading the diaries like that of a certain Anne Frank hiding from the Gestapo, and looking at pictures and videos from Nazi Germany at that time allows for the closest link possible from today to the days gone by, and rejecting these ideas as a fabrication severs the best link to the truth. Holocaust deniers will be inclined to believe what they want to be true, even if it does not match up historically. The Holocaust was a dismal time not only for the Jewish race, but also a cataclysmic event in the history of mankind. The idea that not all people are equal and those of less value need to be exterminated is a notion that should never have occurred. The evidence that we have today appears to confirm that the Jewish Genocide by the Nazi people was a real event. In addition, it is extremely difficult to reasonably doubt this event and believe that people would lie about such an ordeal. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. How far was the holocaust a long term plan of nazi racial policy?

    She states that this is when the order for the extermination of all Eastern European Jews was sent out. This is logical because it meant as Germany was conquering land during their invasion of the Soviet Union they could exterminate the Jews, instead of them remaining unwanted under their command.

  2. Assess the view that the Holocaust was mainly a result of a long term ...

    Passage D reveals Heydrich's pivotal radicalisation role in a rational extension of Hitler's, "blanket authorization". Alongside the detail of his absence from Wannsee, the author suggests that Hitler was able to rely on open ended "authorization", because policy was "eminently coherent" at least in direction, as Passage C correctly insists.

  1. Leni Riefenstahl The Propagandist or Artist? A Historiographical Debate.

    works and subsequent public person as well as her attributes and beliefs. THE PROPAGANDIST? * Riefenstahl Nazi films have been criticized as being reflections of Nazi ideology and as attempts to subliminally influence the German people, therefore being forms of propaganda.

  2. Goebbels was more influential than Himmler. Discuss

    Germany and his use of terror kept Germany together and made the Nazi party more powerful so that it can stay in power. Before Himmler became the leader of the SS he was a chicken farmer, which enabled him to gain connexions with the average German people and hence develop his influence upon others.

  1. How did the Holocaust happen, and who is responsible?

    Without the cooperation of the SS there may have been much more uproar and oppression. The SS succeeded in oppressing people who objected against the regime, often making an example of them. The SS were looked up to by the youth, and some of the elderly alike as the strong

  2. Causes of show trials + purges of 1930s.

    What impact did the purges have on ordinary Russians? 4. How many people were sent to the Gulag? 5. How many were executed? 1. Yezhovschina was the most violent stage of the purges. It looked from 1936-1938. It was name after Yezhov, the head of the NKVD at the time.

  1. The Holocaust was the result of Hitlers long held grand design to pursue a ...

    Characteristically, Intentionalist historians have adopted a very literal approach to interpreting this. The interpretation of Hitler?s works by Intentionalist historians are often saturated with exaggeration ; Intentionalists hold a very literal take on works such as Mein Kampf, all too often, too literal.

  2. "The Wannsee Conference was entirely responsible for the Holocaust" How valid is this assessment ...

    This source is neither for or against the functionalist or intentionalist approach, however if we continue with the idea that the Holocaust and mass genocide of all inferior races, Jews in particular had already been decided upon long before the meeting at the Wannsee conference, Wannsee being in January 1942

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work