• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Holocaust Denial

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

David Irving has claimed that the Holocaust was a "hoax" and that there were no gas chambers in Auschwitz; discuss the evidence for and against this claim. "One is astonished in the study of history at the recurrence of the idea that evil must be forgotten, distorted, skimmed over. The difficulty, of course, with this philosophy is that history loses its value as an incentive and example; it paints perfect men and noble nations, but it does not tell the truth." -W.E.B Du Bois, Black Reconstruction, 1935. There could not be a more appropriate account to go with the debate between Holocaust deniers, and those who see it as a genuine event in history. From our mid teens we are taught about the events that occurred under Hitler's reign, the most horrific of those being the mass genocide of an estimated eleven million people, many of which Jews, during the Holocaust. It is also taught that the most famous extermination camp existed at Auschwitz, where up to 10'000 people were exterminated per day. These are exactly the kind of facts that were presented to me during school, and to many others; some individuals, however, claim that this horrific event never took place. Those who claim the Holocaust did not appear as traditional history describes, believe that "the current mainstream understanding of the Holocaust is the result of a deliberate Jewish conspiracy created to advance the interest of Jews at the expense of other nations." ...read more.

Middle

But that the "Holocaust - the alleged extermination of some six million Jews (most of them by gassing) - is a hoax and should be recognized as such by Christians and all informed, honest and truthful men everywhere." More than being just a pro-Nazi viewpoint, Holocaust deniers believe that the death-toll amount which is widely accepted is a falsehood in an attempt to get more compensation, and sympathy. It is believed that the interest of the Zionist movement is to augment the amount of Holocaust deaths so that their gains will be greater. (5) The Holocaust deniers maintain that the Holocaust is a myth in order to establish the possibilities which can occur when an individual or group of people try to play God. This claim may have resulted from various factors, and in many cases of a denial, a particular political agenda backs it up, along with their own personal beliefs colouring their view. To fully understand the claims of these people, both sides of the debate must be looked at. The case which acknowledges the Holocaust as it is presented has much more convincing evidence, the most notable of which being photographs, video footage and personal accounts. Where the Holocaust deniers get their supposed evidence from however, is the jigsaw in which the evidence which shows the Holocaust as the event we're taught it to be is made up of. ...read more.

Conclusion

Of course, the issue which arises with both of these claims, and history as a whole, is that unless someone is actually present at an event and experiencing something, they have no way of knowing exactly what went on during a given time and date. It is for these reasons which we need to rely on sources other than ourselves to understand the past, and a primary source is the most reliable place to look first. Talking with a Holocaust survivor, reading the diaries like that of a certain Anne Frank hiding from the Gestapo, and looking at pictures and videos from Nazi Germany at that time allows for the closest link possible from today to the days gone by, and rejecting these ideas as a fabrication severs the best link to the truth. Holocaust deniers will be inclined to believe what they want to be true, even if it does not match up historically. The Holocaust was a dismal time not only for the Jewish race, but also a cataclysmic event in the history of mankind. The idea that not all people are equal and those of less value need to be exterminated is a notion that should never have occurred. The evidence that we have today appears to confirm that the Jewish Genocide by the Nazi people was a real event. In addition, it is extremely difficult to reasonably doubt this event and believe that people would lie about such an ordeal. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. How far was the holocaust a long term plan of nazi racial policy?

    of the Jews and therefore it is difficult to pinpoint the exact date or wording of the order. Henig then highlights September 1941 as the time that the mass extermintation of all Jews was called for. She supports this by explaining by this point it has been realised that an

  2. Causes of show trials + purges of 1930s.

    The result was a widespread famine 1932-33 (particularly affected Ukraine, Kazakhstan and Causcasous) The government officially denied any existence of famine; a claim supported by foreign visitors but they had been escorted to model collectives well away from the famine areas.

  1. The Holocaust

    This sense of community, stemming from their shared experience of persecution, meant that most Jews kept a strong sense of ethnic identity regardless of where they lived but meant that they stayed as outsiders and scapegoats (Farmer, A., 2009, pp 14-15).

  2. Assess the view that the Holocaust was mainly a result of a long term ...

    Passage B contradicts the idea of rationality to an extent by emphasizing the "mythical target of 'the Jew'", to reflect the more immediate emotive tactics employed by propagandists which were required in spite of Hitler's firm personal belief in the logic of removing the corruptive influence of Jews.

  1. The Wannsee Conference was entirely responsible for the Holocaust. How valid is this assessment ...

    It shows that Hitler did not accommodate the Holocaust because he was pressured by his nation and associates. The Nazi party's intentions were clear from the publication of their first party programme in 1920. Document A shows point four of their programme.

  2. Leni Riefenstahl The Propagandist or Artist? A Historiographical Debate.

    * Racial harmony is promoted through the fair skinned, blonde haired children, soldiers and workers, who are feature prominently throughout the film: * In these ways the film has been considered as the propaganda film of all time - emphasizing the solidarity of the Nazi Party, the unity of the

  1. The Holocaust was the result of Hitlers long held grand design to pursue a ...

    That was until they found a scape goat; local leaders of modern Switzerland, France and Germany accused Jews of poisoning wells and as a result (as depicted above) many were burnt alive. The Jews had garnered a status as a sort of universal scapegoat, starting with their supposed culpability in

  2. "The Wannsee Conference was entirely responsible for the Holocaust" How valid is this assessment ...

    reach that end, and the Jews conspiracy would be the main obstacle upon the quest, therefore in the Nazi's eyes eradication of that obstacle would bring glory upon the German Nation. It was this ideological racial war[5] so to speak between the two political systems that was the most powerful driving factor of the Holocaust and the Nazi war machine.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work