• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How accurate would it be to describe Cavour as the architect of Italy?

Extracts from this document...


Alex Mansfield How accurate would it be to describe Cavour as the architect of Italy? According to the historian Arthur Whyte Cavour was the "architect of modern kingdom of Italy". Other historians believe that the other leaders of the Risorgimento such as Garabaldi played a larger part in the unification than Whyte has given them credit for. Some even believed that Cavour did not want a united Italy, but as the Republican activist Pallauicino said "what Cavour wants... is just for Piedmont to be enlarged by a few square miles of Italian soil." Cavour founded his own publication "Il Risorgimento" in 1847 upon the freedom of censorship so could publicise his political ideas for the future of Italy. Cavour became minister of agriculture, commerce and navy he finally became Prime Minister in 1852. The first step towards the unification of Italy seemed to be when Italy joined the Crimean war in 1854 on 5the side of France and Britain. ...read more.


It appeared that Cavour was satisfied with this agreement showing that neither he nor Napoleon III wanted unification. In fact Napoleon may not have been willing to help if Italy wanted unification as, it would have been a threat on his borders. The two battles at Magenta and Solferino resulted in Piedmont gaining Lombardy. At this time Cavour took advantage of the revolutions in central Italy and Austria's inability to react to send in the Piedmontese army and set up provisional governments. Napoleon III obviously worried about these events and the opinion of the French public signed an armistice at Villafranca. Cavour was furious and resigned knowing he could not continue the war without Frances help. The unification of Italy came a step closer in 1860 when in Tuscany, Parma, Modena and the Papal States the popular mood was unhappy and many states wanted union with Piedmont. Cavour offered Napoleon Nice and Savoy in return for the states of Central Italy. ...read more.


Although he lost Nice and Savoy he gained France's help (much to Mazzini's displeasure who believed only Italians should unite Italy, but he was an idealist.) It was only after the taking of Central Italy in 1860 that unification appeared conceivable. However Cavour was prompted into action by Garabaldi's actions in the south, the result was a "kingdom of Italy. Cavour died in 1861 so he did not live to see the final unification of Italy when Venetia and Rome were added in 1866 and 1870, but he did play an important role in Italy's unification. In conclusion to call him the architect of modern Italy would be too extreme as without Garabaldi's actions in the south it is doubtful whether he would have created the kingdom. Cavour can be viewed as the architect of Italy, an opportunist or even a Piedmontese expansionist. The contribution that Cavour made is still debated over as knew evidence is examined, but I believe that the view of Arthur Whyte is too biased as without the contribution made be others the unification of Italy may not have occurred. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Compare & Contrast Cavour & Garibaldi's Contributions to the Unification.

    Cavour did not originally favour unification. He was more interested in the self-aggrandisement of Piedmont. When he met with Napoleon III at Plombieres, all he wanted was for Piedmont to annexe Lombardy and Venetia and rid the new state of the Austrian influence.

  2. Who was more responsible for the success of Italian Unification up to 1861? Cavour, ...

    When the Crimean war broke out in 1853 a perfect opportunity was granted. Victor Emmanuel offered the British, French and Turkish alliance a force of 18,000 men to assist the cause, this was accepted and in return Piedmont was given a seat at the negotiating table (The treaty of Paris).

  1. Facist Italy by John Whittam - review

    Mussolini also had the view that capital and labour are at odds with each other. As well he implemented the no opposition policy and no regular elections. The Italian community was willing to forgive some of those infringements and democratic rights.

  2. Compare and contrast Cavour and Garibaldi's contributions to Unification.

    He was even thought by many of the Sicilian Peasantry to be Jesus Christ due to his incredible previous successes and uncannily similar physical appearance (although he was thought to be an outlaw in conservative circles!). The Thousand was made up mostly from students, young professionals and artisans.

  1. "Mussolini was an all powerful dictator" - How accurate is this statement?

    4000 suspects, they were used more as a real threat to any possible opponents to keep the peace. However this still meant that Mussolini had this loyal secret police to control local opposition for him, making him even more powerful.

  2. Fascist Italy

    He began indoctrinating the Italian people from childhood by interfering with history textbooks and rewriting the curriculum to promote his party. Portraits of Mussolini hung in each classroom; children were presented with a copy of Mussolini's biography, which taught them to believe what Emile Henroit said of him, 'The great

  1. Bismarck up until 1861.

    He moved to Berlin University where he managed to pass his law exams, just. After this he joined the Prussian civic service. He hated this, despising his superiors and the colleagues who he had to work with. He left after 4 years and completed a year of military service, which both he and the army hated.

  2. How far do you agree that Cavour made the most significant contribution to Italian ...

    on Piedmont?s terms and by September 1860 Piedmont troops were occupying the Papal States. Garibaldi surrendered his conquests to Piedmont which allowed the northern and southern states of Italy to be united. And by surrendering his southern conquests to Piedmont Garibaldi's influence, it seems to me, was small in the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work