• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How and why did the Weimar Governments collapse between October 1929 and January 1933?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Collapse of Weimar 1929-1933 How and why did the Weimar Governments collapse between October 1929 and January 1933? [12] The Weimar Republic did not begin on the best of footings. Before it even commenced it was fleeing from conflict it didn't want to deal with, and chose to base itself in the city of Weimar, instead of Germany's capital city Berlin which was, at the time, too unstable for a newly created government. It was almost inevitable, due to the fact that the Weimar Republic was established in the aftermath of WWI, that those involved with Weimar's construction would be blamed for Germany's surrender and the acceptance of the Treaty of Versailles which, in no uncertain terms, destroyed Germany, along with the German people's respect for their government. In the eyes of the people, Weimar was 'brought about by defeat' . When queried about the causes of Germany's defeat, Hindenburg claimed that it was made unavoidable by the 'defeatism' of the civilian population, politicians (particularly those who had signed the hugely unpopular and damaging Treaty of Versailles and would 'benefit' from Weimar's construction), socialists, communists, Jews and sometimes even Catholics, who had apparently played a role in selling out Germany to her enemies. The term 'November Criminals' was adopted to describe those who were seen to have "stabbed Germany in the back" through various means, particularly the signing of the Treaty of Versailles, and these 'criminals' were forever seen as a symbol of the foundation of Weimar, thus making it impossible for the Weimar Republic to be associated with anything but the defeat and humiliation the German people felt they did not deserve. ...read more.

Middle

On March 27th 1930, this prime example of German democracy crumbled, leaving Reichspr�sident Hindenburg to select a new government. His chosen Chancellor was Heinrich Br�ning , whose financial and economic acumen made him a candidate for chancellor and his military background, highlighted by the political lobbying of General Kurt Von Schleicher on his behalf, won him approval from the eternally militarily-inclined Hindenburg. However, Br�ning 's policy of tight credit and a roll-back of all wage and salary increases to further his ultimate aim of liberating Germany from the burden of war reparations did not go down well with the Reichstag, who took less than a month to decide to reject his suggested measures. This was seen by an already anti-Reichstag Hindenburg as a "failure of parliament" and new elections were called to, hopefully, form a more willing Reichstag. Unfortunately, all this served to do was further marginalise any remnants of the Grand Coalition's stability by doing away with the majority held by the parties of the Grand Coalition in favour of the Communists and the National Socialists. The elections saw political shift on a massive scale, with five times the amount of votes going to the Nazis than did in 1928, an impressive 18.3% of the total vote, making the NSDAP the second largest party in the Reichstag after the SPD. There was now no possibility of forging a party coalition and even less possibility of passing the radical bills that Br�ning wished to pass, and so from 1930 to 1932 Br�ning took to basing his administration on the "Notverordnung" (Presidential Emergency Decree) outlined in Article 48, which effectively rendered the parliament with very little power. ...read more.

Conclusion

Unfortunately, this was not to be the case. The date on which Hitler was appointed Chancellor, known to Nazis as the Machtergreifung (seizure of power), is commonly seen as the beginning of Nazi Germany and the end of Weimar. Despite Papen immediately sensing that he had underestimated Hitler's craving for control and requesting that Hindenburg dismiss him following a rapid marginalisation of Papen and the rest of the cabinet by Hitler and his allies, attempts to undo this grave error failed, and by March 1933, the Nazi Party had secured 288 seats in the Reichstag. Hitler was well on his way to dictatorial power. The reasons for the Weimar Republic's collapse are the subject of a long debate. From the analysis within this essay, it would not be unreasonable to concluded that it was doomed from the beginning, with hatred coming from the extremists and dislike coming from almost everyone in-between. Germany had limited democratic traditions and Weimar democracy was widely seen as chaotic, a new experience for everyone involved. And since Weimar politicians had been blamed for the 'Dolchstosslegende' - the popular legitimacy of the government was on shaky ground. No single reason can explain the failure of the Weimar Republic, and instead the collapse of this valiant attempt at democracy is the result of a plethora of terrible mistakes, inexperience, bad luck and a lack of support. Had it been executed better, or even had it been built on a legacy that wasn't the nation's humiliation in a war still known to this day as the Great War, then perhaps it would have had a more optimistic chance at working. But, as it is, the Weimar Republic was merely a brief break for Germany between wars, and, in all honesty, was lucky to survive for the length of time it did. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Assess the reasons why the Weimar Republic faced so many problems in the 1920s

    Perhaps if democracy had been introduced more gradually over time, it would have been accepted more easily in German society and would therefore have been more successful. However, as the constitution introduced democracy so rapidly, people did not trust it because it was so different to the old system that they were used to.

  2. Why was the Weimar Republic able to survive threats posed to it by its ...

    form of financial assistance and through the efforts of the Russian communist agent Karl Radek. Ultimately however the extreme left's bid for power was doomed from the start. In an atmosphere that demanded authority and decisiveness the Spartacists were lead by the intellectual combination of Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht,

  1. Describe the stages by which the Weimar Republic emerged from the collapse of Imperial ...

    Whilst the behaviour of Hindenburg Ludendorff in the autumn of 1918 was diabolical the civilian politicians, who were saddled with responsibility and left stranded in a military predicament that was hopeless, acted extremely well. They recognised that the situation was bleak, as Scheidemann indicated; 'we knew we were inheriting a

  2. Hitlers Germany

    A New Beginning West Germany built in many styles on its ruins. In the first stage a roof was put over a ground floor, a theater, or a "hotel" was made of an air-raid shelter. Many of the later structures look like American apartment houses and office buildings.

  1. The Holocaust was the result of Hitlers long held grand design to pursue a ...

    In other words, just because Hitler wanted the Jews dead and it happened, does not mean Hitler alone made it happen. To support this, Structuralists point to the fact that although, in Mein Kampf, Hitler repeatedly states his inexorable hatred of the Jewish people, no-where does he proclaim his intention

  2. How stable was the Weimar Republic 1924-29 ?

    Socially the welfare extended meaning the working class made gains as in November 1918; workers won agreement from employers to an 8-hour working day and a system of industrial tribunals. This was a massive achievement as before workers had no say on how long they worked and how much money

  1. Was the work of Gustav Stresemann the main reason for the Weimar governments ability ...

    Such brought about considerable instability into the country, consequently making the duty more difficult for the government. Indeed the threat of political extremism (from both ends of the political spectrum) increased even further through the emergence and growth of extremist groups, such as the far left ?sparticists? and far right ?Freikorps?.

  2. How effectively did Weimar governments deal with the problems faced between 1919-1929?

    meant that voters didn?t feel close to politicians. This resulted in dozens of tiny parties, with no party strong enough to get a majority, no government gets its laws passed in the Reichstag. This was a major weakness of the Republic. The republic was threatened by communist uprisings (Spartacus revolt)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work