• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How close to revolution was Great Britain in the 1790s?

Extracts from this document...


How close to revolution was Great Britain in the 1790?s? The 1790?s wasn?t the easiest of times for Britain. Revolution overthrowing the monarchy in France caused working-class civilians in Britain to entertain the idea of revolutionizing. This, among other aspects such as the war with France and food supply, meant that Britain, led by Pitt, had to fight off the threat of revolution. It would be a fair statement to make that although Great Britain had big enough threats and factors for revolution to actually happen, the threat lacked a certain spark that could have ignited the revolution, spreading into a full-blown fire across the whole country, helping end the monarchy. The first key point to look at is the nature of British society at the time. The economy and living conditions can always be catalysts for a revolution- an example is the sorry state of the French economy, one of the major causes of revolution breaking out there, just before they went into revolution. Now, had the economy of Britain in the 1790?s been as crippled as France?s was, then it would have been likely that people in Great Britain would have been feeling desperate for change, and a revolutionary would have been looking likely. However, this was not the case. ...read more.


For a country to revolutionize, most of the country?s people need to have the desire to overthrow the King, in order to have enough power and force to do so. Take France as an example once again, the Third Estate made up around 90% of the country, and virtually all of the third estate wanted to see change, hence why France was swept up in revolution. This was not the case in Britain. Perhaps it was because the class-system was on the whole fairer-the clergy did not dominate as much in Britain as it did in France, and the working class of Britain, though most likely discontent, were on the whole miles happier than the French working class in comparison. This one factor alone was one of, if not the, greatest reasons why Britain steered clear of revolution and did not come as close as it may well have. Having said that, Pitt made sure radical ideas, actions and organisations were subdued. To supress the threat of revolution, Pitt brought upon changes to certain acts and even created new ones. One example is how Pitt suspended the Habeas Corpus Amendment act from 1974-1795, then again from 1798-1801. This act meant that people could only be arrested after solid evidence, however after the temporary removal of this act, anyone could be arrested and held indefinitely, even if there was no evidence and they were merely being held on suspicion. ...read more.


Britain faced many threats, such as radical ideas spreading across Britain, the faltering economy, the war with France, the lack of a police force and so on; however Britain reacted very well and did everything it could to the best of its ability to suppress the idea of revolution from getting out of hand-harsh measures introduced helped dispel revolutionaries, and the stabilisation of the economy and standard of life was crucial in helping to satisfy the majority of the population. Fundamental flaws were present in the opposition, and it was these flaws which never allowed them to have a real chance in overthrowing the King. A distinct minority of people in Great Britain wanted change, and so trying to disrupt the regime, as well as having very little access to arms and weaponry and themselves being spilt about their aims, was always going to be a daunting task. It was a task that was attempted to be carried out by the revolutionaries, and despite posing a variety of threats to the country, the radicals lacked a certain spark and the government dealt with them well. A fundamental cohesion and stability was seen throughout Britain in 1790?s, as, despite the fact the revolutionaries probed and questioned the government?s stability, the government and Britain answered, responded well, and managed to quash the threat of revolution in Great Britain, ensuring that Britain, although sternly tested, sailed clear of revolution ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Analyse the causes of the 1848 revolution in France.

    Thiers even implied it would be an issue that France would go to was over. Unfortunately Britain called Frances bluff as Britain and Russia forced Ali to accept their terms. Louis-Phillipe was humiliated as he wasn't prepared to risk a war with Britain and Russia; he dismissed Thiers and had to accept national humiliation.

  2. Assess the nature and threat posed by Puritanism

    Four years after, in 1576, Peter Wentworth was sent to the tower for similar offenses. Therefore, Puritanism was seen by Elizabeth to be threatening to her established Church for ideological reasons alone, because in practice, the Queen could, and did, employ formidable powers to suppress it successfully.

  1. How effectively did Pitt deal with the external threats of the French Revolution?

    Danish, an enemy of Britain because of the Armed Neutrality of the North, which Russia, Sweden, Denmark and Prussia formed in 1800 in response to British interference in their trade. However, the blue water strategy wasn't a complete success. Many soldiers were lost, for example around 70% of the 89,000 British troops sent to the Caribbean died.

  2. How effectively did Pitt deal with the internal problems caused by the French Revolution?

    This could have been because people were afraid of the punishments that might befall them if they broke the law, and so weren't prepared to risk radical actions. However, the few arrests could also be because there was no real threat in the first place, so this argument is flawed.

  1. How united was Britain in 1688?

    This alone would have been sufficient to cause unrest amidst the noble class, but their fears were heightened by memories of the actions of Charles I during his eleven year Personal Rule. Furthermore, comparisons between Charles' Arminianism and Laudian reforms and the Catholicism of James II would have increased fears

  2. How far & to what extent was Louis responsible for the turn of events ...

    Obviously, this lead to massive exploitation, with many intendants enriching themselves completely at the expense of the bourgeoisie and peasantry. This system, a relic from times past, also meant that France was divided up into over 120 separate areas, requiring masses of civil servants to co-ordinate events.

  1. Industrial Revolution

    the reign of Henry VIII, became the condition of more than 80 per cent by the mid nineteenth century." In certain areas of Britain the social, political, cultural and economic changes that this period of history bequeathed constitute a complete, grass roots revolution whereby the look of certain places in 1914 bore no resemblance to their appearance in 1780.

  2. How well did Pitt deal with the radical threat?

    It was also essential, as Britain needed to be fully prepared to fight off any revolution, especially after shortages in the military following the war with America. This law stopped radicals in the army from causing unrest as the punishment was very harsh, which obviously, similar to the two previous acts, deterred many possible radicals from starting an uprising.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work