How did Black Southerners respond to the rising tide of racism and to attempts to disfranchise them and impose segregation?

Authors Avatar

How did Black Southerners respond to the rising tide of racism and to attempts to disfranchise them and impose segregation?

In 1871 Daniel Corbin, a white South Carolina Republican, summarized the astounding changes affecting the four million recently liberated African American slaves, and the nation as a whole, in the early years of the Reconstruction after the Civil War when he declared that “we have lived over a century in the last ten years.”

The new order began with the fall of Richmond, Virginia, on the night of 2 April 1865.  As Confederate troops abandoned the city, President Jefferson Davis and the Confederate Congress went with them.  Their evacuation was prompted by black as well as white Union troops converging on the city from three sides.  With the next day came a sight few Richmonders would ever forget.  A column of black soldiers, many of them former Virginia slaves, marching down the streets of the former Confederate capital.  Later that day in the Virginia Hall of Delegates, where only a week earlier the Confederate Congress had been meeting, black soldiers took turns in swivelling in the speakers chair.

Many planters could not imagine a labour system other than slavery.  As one Southerner wrote in 1866, “we are discouraged: we have nothing left to begin new with.  I never did a day’s work in my life and I don’t know how to begin.”

The problem facing Northern leaders was how to restore national unity after a bloody and bitter sectional conflict.  Planters were determined to restore home rule to the Southern states.  Conversely, the power relationships between Northerners and Southerners had dramatically changed, and the emancipated black man realised this.  With the Freedmen’s Bureau behind them, African Americans worked to change the conditions of their labour.  Contracts were demanded to set out the terms of employment; furthermore, black workers demanded an end to the old slave gang labour system.  To combat the rising black movement, white Southern Democrats initiated a plan to restore the old order they so desperately craved.  The white community was facing potential ruin; in Beaufort, South Carolina, for example the Negro, population outnumbered the white population by 20 to 1.  The Reconstruction era witnessed sharp political conflict that often turned into physical violence, as Davis and Woodman explain, “The Ku Klux Klan and other groups intimidated, harassed, beat, and killed blacks”.  Obviously, former slaveholders and their support used such tactics to regain control.  

To some extent this approach worked, by the 1880’s, sharecropping and peonage had replaced slavery and ensured poverty for the majority of blacks until well into the twentieth century.  Sharecropping arose because few blacks could gain access to land in the post war South.  White southerners, recognizing both the desire of blacks to own land and the relationship of landowning to political power, were determined that the freed people should remain landless.  They therefore opposed federal schemes for land confiscation and redistribution and refused to sell land to the few blacks willing and able to pay for it.  

Join now!

The denial of land ownership forced blacks to become sharecroppers, tenants (renters), and contract labourers, under a system known as peonage.  Under the sharecropping system, a family committed itself to producing a crop on land it did not own.  Under normal circumstances, the two parties agreed upon sharing the harvest for the year of the contract, usually one-third for the cropper family and two-thirds for the landowner, who provided seeds, fertilizer, draft animals, and food and clothing for the cropping family.  However, the illiteracy of most former slaves and the caprice of many planters ensured abuse and exploitation.

Southern politicians, ...

This is a preview of the whole essay