• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How Did Henry VII Manage to Secure the Throne After 1485?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How Did Henry VII Manage to Secure the Throne After 1485? In this essay I will be trying to find out exactly how and when Henry VII secured the throne for himself, also to finally conclude by deciding when Henry, himself, felt secure on the throne. I will be analysing and evaluating the methods he used to secure the throne such as victory at the Battle of Bosworth, his marriage to Elizabeth of York, how he dealt with the minor risings of Lovel and Stafford, problems with pretenders to the throne Lambert Simnel and Perkin Warbeck and other rebellions in 1489 and 1497. Henry's claim to the throne by inheritance was weak. It was through his mother's marriage to one of the sons of Edward III, that Henry had based his claim; despite the fact that his mother, Margaret Beaufort had divorced the king's son. Henry was the son of Margaret Beaufort and Edmund Tudor. Henry VII also claimed royal blood on his father's side, whose mother was a French princess and had been married to Henry V before marrying Owen Tudor. This is his first problem in securing the throne; his claim was weak. At the time before Henry VII's reign were bad times for England; they lacked a good strong king. Because there was no good king and strong figure of authority the country was prone to rebellions and was at risk from invasion. ...read more.

Middle

The risings started when Henry was travelling north to York to establish his presence as king, and secure their support. As Henry travelled north three lords (Lord Lovel and brothers Lord Thomas Stafford and Lord Humphrey Stafford) broke sanctuary. Lovel travelled north to waylay the king; meanwhile the Stafford's went to stir a rebellion in the west. Henry was aware of this, but in order to show his confidence as king and act like he was not worried he continued to York and sent an armed force to the rebels. There they offered the rebels a pardon, or if they fought and lost excommunication and death. The rebels dispersed, and Lovel was not captured. However, the Stafford's were caught. Humphrey was executed, but pardoned afterwards and remained loyal. Henry harshly punished the ringleaders of the rebellion, but was merciful to the others, this proved successful and Henry was supported for it. It showed that he was a strong king, he was able to deal with the rebellion appropriately, but was merciful where mercy was due. Henry was now seen as the upholder of justice and order. Another threat to Henry were the two main pretenders to the throne, Lambert Simnel and Perkin Warbeck. Lambert Simnel was less of a threat to Henry than Warbeck; but still both worried Henry. ...read more.

Conclusion

This caused resentment especially in Yorkshire as they were suffering from a bad harvest the previous summer, also the fact that people further north were exempt from the tax as there were expected to defend the country from the Scottish; this further angered the people of Yorkshire. The Earl of Northumberland put their case to Henry, but he would not negotiate. When the Earl returned with the news he was murdered, presumably by angry rebels. The Earl of Surrey defeated the rebels outside York. Henry travelled north to pardon the prisoners, but he did not receive any more of his tax. In conclusion I doubt that Henry ever felt entirely secure on the throne. This is because he was opposed even by some of his own supporters, if it was in their own interests to do so. Most people's loyalties could easily be swayed if it suited them. In order for him to feel completely safe Henry would have to rely on the loyalties of others, which would not be advised. However, Henry was a good king; arguable the best king that England had seen for sometime. Henry was a successful king in many areas such as government, trade and the restoration of law and order. Due to his success in these areas it is easy to overlook the troubles he endured in order to keep the throne. It is a credit to Henry that he managed to hand the throne in tact to his son, where three previous kings had not managed to do so. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Who was the greater threat to Henry VII's throne, Lambert Simnel or Perkin Warbeck?

    The bodies of the princes were not found at this time so this may have increased suspicions from the people of England and Henry's supporters that Warbeck could have been the real Prince, and the execution could have been a way of removing Warbeck from getting the crown.

  2. The Battle of Bosworth.

    Even though this is true Vergil's history often presents pure facts making it good reliable history. So the armies would have been placed as below, the Stanley's are clearly well away from the battle just far enough to see the battle from a safe distance.

  1. To What Extent Was Henry Vll Secure?

    From this we can see the pretenders were a large threat to Henry and he treated Warbeck's threat very seriously. Even after Warbeck's execution Henrys position was not fully secure, since he was a usurper himself, he could never afford to rest easy.

  2. Were the pretenders a serious threat to Henry VII's throne?

    he became the figure head to the undertaking, and was now a solid threat to Henry. Simnel was also given troops to help him when he invaded England. Because of this amount of support, Perkin Warbeck thought he would receive similar treatment when he began his effort to take the crown.

  1. Describe How Henry VII Was Able To Take the Throne In 1485 &Middot; His ...

    Due to Richards' unpopularity Henry gained more support in his attempt of taking the throne because many people simply wanted rid of Richard. From these rumours he also gained the support of Yorkists- Elizabeth Woodville whose two sons were the ones that Richard III was alleged to have killed and also Elizabeth's daughter Elizabeth of York, who actually married Henry.

  2. Discuss Shakespeare's presentation of women in Richard III. Are they convincing characters?

    She compares the deaths of the princes to her own tragedies, thus demonstrating the wheel of fortune- the wheel has turned and the change is observed with triumph and bitterness by a lurking, isolated speaker. She eventually reveals herself and says: ' I had an Edward, till a Richard killed him; I had a husband, till a Richard killed him.

  1. Henry VII and His Money.

    Furthermore if the ward was a girl, when she married her husband would get control of the land. So suitors, who might be more interested in the dead parent's lands than the girl, applied to the King as her guardian for permission to marry her, hoping to get the royal favour by bribes of various sorts.

  2. How did Henry VII manage to secure his throne and his dynasty following the ...

    Henry also used dynastic royal marriages to establish his dynasty in England and help maintain peace. He managed to secure a marriage between his eldest son, Arthur, and the Spanish princess, Catherine of Aragon, in 1501. Control of the nobility was very important.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work