• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How did Lenin's economic policies arouse opposition within the Bolshevik party and within the USSR?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How did Lenin's economic policies arouse opposition within the Bolshevik party and within the USSR? Any government trying to repair its country's ruined economic state will undoubtedly have problems and opposition, but the Bolshevik party had another great burden - to turn Russia into a Marxist state. Lenin isolated the majority of Russia in 1917 by forming many decrees and taking various actions, mostly ruled by ideology, for example, censorship, he took away freedom of speech from every non-Bolshevik party. These actions were all during the first of Lenin's economy policies - State Capitalism. This policy wasn't as ideological as the New Economic Policy (NEP) introduced in 1921 where although economic control was relaxed, political control was tightened, but it was a start. ...read more.

Middle

By 1923 the NEP was responsible for 3/4s of all retail trade and in 1926 the economy had almost regained the production rates of 1913. However, the economic policy which without doubt caused the most opposition was War Communism. Every single group turned against Lenin, even including people from his own, towards the end of war communism. Lenin used oppressive and violent tactics to exert control over Russia and the least popular technique was grain requisitioning. He turned the peasants against him almost instantly by sending the Cheka to forcefully take their grain to sell. The peasants resisted by producing the bare minimum, this gradually led to inflation, then famine. 1/5 people died from starvation. By October 1920 the rouble was worth 1% of its 1917 value. ...read more.

Conclusion

Overall, the most successful economic policy was NEP, even though some saw it as disloyalty because they thought some kulaks were exploiting poorer peasants the majority was happy and it was an essential step for Lenin to take. The economy improved greatly because of the NEP, this is shown by the grain harvest rates, in 1921, the end of war communism, 37.6 million tons were produced, and then 4 years into the NEP this doubled to 72.5 million tons. War Communism was such a failure because Lenin used forceful and suppressive tactics which reminded Russia of tsarist times which they had fought for so long to be rid of. Lenin turned the people against him and gained many enemies. Yagmur Ekici ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    Workers also served the Bolsheviks in a variety of other roles. Many workers proved to be tireless agitators, for example. From the very beginning of the revolution the workers appear to have been motivated by self-interest rather than by any substantial comprehension of Marxism or any other ideology.

  2. Soviet State

    the Civil War, and changed its name to the GPU under the NEP, losing much of its size and its right to try and sentence at will. * With the end of the New Economic Policy, the role of the secret police expanded again, as it was ordered to deal

  1. War communism and NEP

    An advantage of this tax was that it was a 'tax in kind' so that the people may give a proportion of whatever they had made instead of needing to earn money to pay tax, giving the peasants some incentive to produce more.

  2. Explain why these policies aroused opposition within the Bolsheviks within the USSR?

    Lenin had managed to dodge yet another bullet but knew that desperate action was needed, even if it meant going against his ideological beliefs slightly. By 1921 the economy was in serious trouble due to the strain of seven years of foreign and civil war combined with war communism.

  1. The significance of Lenin in the Bolshevik Revolution (1917-1923).

    He also revealed the lack of power the Duma possesed. Both he and Zinoviev firstly oppossed the idea of an October revolution but soon agreed to it. Both Kamenev and Zinoviev were in exile so like Lenin were unable to do as much as they wanted to.However Alexander Shlyapnikov, was not in exile during the post-October revolution.

  2. The Significance of Lenin in the Bolshevik Revolution (1917-1923)

    However, even by April 1917, the Bolsheviks were nowhere near strong enough to take power. Lenin was building them up, preparing them for the 'real' revolution that he had planned for. A revolution had been his focus for many years and now he was now giving signals that the Bolsheviks

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work