• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How did Lenin's economic policies arouse opposition within the Bolshevik party and within the USSR?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How did Lenin's economic policies arouse opposition within the Bolshevik party and within the USSR? Any government trying to repair its country's ruined economic state will undoubtedly have problems and opposition, but the Bolshevik party had another great burden - to turn Russia into a Marxist state. Lenin isolated the majority of Russia in 1917 by forming many decrees and taking various actions, mostly ruled by ideology, for example, censorship, he took away freedom of speech from every non-Bolshevik party. These actions were all during the first of Lenin's economy policies - State Capitalism. This policy wasn't as ideological as the New Economic Policy (NEP) introduced in 1921 where although economic control was relaxed, political control was tightened, but it was a start. ...read more.

Middle

By 1923 the NEP was responsible for 3/4s of all retail trade and in 1926 the economy had almost regained the production rates of 1913. However, the economic policy which without doubt caused the most opposition was War Communism. Every single group turned against Lenin, even including people from his own, towards the end of war communism. Lenin used oppressive and violent tactics to exert control over Russia and the least popular technique was grain requisitioning. He turned the peasants against him almost instantly by sending the Cheka to forcefully take their grain to sell. The peasants resisted by producing the bare minimum, this gradually led to inflation, then famine. 1/5 people died from starvation. By October 1920 the rouble was worth 1% of its 1917 value. ...read more.

Conclusion

Overall, the most successful economic policy was NEP, even though some saw it as disloyalty because they thought some kulaks were exploiting poorer peasants the majority was happy and it was an essential step for Lenin to take. The economy improved greatly because of the NEP, this is shown by the grain harvest rates, in 1921, the end of war communism, 37.6 million tons were produced, and then 4 years into the NEP this doubled to 72.5 million tons. War Communism was such a failure because Lenin used forceful and suppressive tactics which reminded Russia of tsarist times which they had fought for so long to be rid of. Lenin turned the people against him and gained many enemies. Yagmur Ekici ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. The Significance of Lenin in the Bolshevik Revolution (1917-1923)

    Their minority status and the fact that they were new to power was not a very positive position for them. As leaders they were responsible for making crucial decisions for Russia. The war situation had to be dealt while still keeping Lenin's promise of land and food for peasants and workers.

  2. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    were familiar with and supportive of the ideological programme of the Socialist Revolutionaries. Their real loyalty, however, as Robert Daniels has observed, was to whomever would keep them from being shipped to the front. There was every reason for the soldiers to resist.

  1. War communism and NEP

    This pragmatic approach caused Lenin, to again, show he was willing to be realistic rather than ideological to help survive the revolution. As the political issues grew narrower for Lenin, this caused him to create the new economic policy or NEP.

  2. Soviet State

    * These figures alone, combined with the Soviet military achievement in the Second World War, indicate that, somehow or other, the Soviet Union had solved the fundamental problem of industrialisation and overcome the military weaknesses inseparable from economic backwardness. * Agriculture production barely rose at all, and livestock remained below the 1928 level until the 1950s.

  1. The significance of Lenin in the Bolshevik Revolution (1917-1923).

    that his influence was not as powerful as if he was in Russia, this meant that the party was not what Lenin wanted exactly and therefore did not do things he wanted done. Also, during the Summer/ Autumn of 1917 Lenin was again in hiding this meant that his orders

  2. Explain why these policies aroused opposition within the Bolsheviks within the USSR?

    Lenin had managed to dodge yet another bullet but knew that desperate action was needed, even if it meant going against his ideological beliefs slightly. By 1921 the economy was in serious trouble due to the strain of seven years of foreign and civil war combined with war communism.

  1. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    The centralised nature of the Stalinist command economy allowed it to adapt relatively quickly to the needs of war. 4. Stalin?s propaganda during the 1930s had already created a ?siege mentality? among Soviet people. They were used to hardship and adapted easily to the crisis of war.

  2. How significant was Lenin between the years 1902-1918 to the formation of the Bolshevik ...

    years of rapid industrialisation, and consequently the need for a large proletariat to secure a communist revolution; as under original Marxist theory. Lenin as a result achieved something thought impossible by fellow Marxists. The writing of the April Theses in April 1917, proved to be of considerable significance in the gaining of support for the Bolshevik party (BP).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work