Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

1. 

   The Significance of Lenin in the Bolshevik Revolution (1917-1923)

   Their minority status and the fact that they were new to power was not a very positive position for them. As leaders they were responsible for making crucial decisions for Russia. The war situation had to be dealt while still keeping Lenin's promise of land and food for peasants and workers.

2. 

   Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

   were familiar with and supportive of the ideological programme of the Socialist Revolutionaries. Their real loyalty, however, as Robert Daniels has observed, was to whomever would keep them from being shipped to the front. There was every reason for the soldiers to resist.

1. 

   War communism and NEP

   This pragmatic approach caused Lenin, to again, show he was willing to be realistic rather than ideological to help survive the revolution. As the political issues grew narrower for Lenin, this caused him to create the new economic policy or NEP.

2. 

   Soviet State

   * These figures alone, combined with the Soviet military achievement in the Second World War, indicate that, somehow or other, the Soviet Union had solved the fundamental problem of industrialisation and overcome the military weaknesses inseparable from economic backwardness. * Agriculture production barely rose at all, and livestock remained below the 1928 level until the 1950s.

1. 

   The significance of Lenin in the Bolshevik Revolution (1917-1923).

   that his influence was not as powerful as if he was in Russia, this meant that the party was not what Lenin wanted exactly and therefore did not do things he wanted done. Also, during the Summer/ Autumn of 1917 Lenin was again in hiding this meant that his orders

2. 

   Explain why these policies aroused opposition within the Bolsheviks within the USSR?

   Lenin had managed to dodge yet another bullet but knew that desperate action was needed, even if it meant going against his ideological beliefs slightly. By 1921 the economy was in serious trouble due to the strain of seven years of foreign and civil war combined with war communism.

1. 

   The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

   The centralised nature of the Stalinist command economy allowed it to adapt relatively quickly to the needs of war. 4. Stalin?s propaganda during the 1930s had already created a ?siege mentality? among Soviet people. They were used to hardship and adapted easily to the crisis of war.

2. 

   How significant was Lenin between the years 1902-1918 to the formation of the Bolshevik ...

   years of rapid industrialisation, and consequently the need for a large proletariat to secure a communist revolution; as under original Marxist theory. Lenin as a result achieved something thought impossible by fellow Marxists. The writing of the April Theses in April 1917, proved to be of considerable significance in the gaining of support for the Bolshevik party (BP).