• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How did Lenin's economic policies arouse opposition within the Bolshevik party and within the USSR?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How did Lenin's economic policies arouse opposition within the Bolshevik party and within the USSR? Any government trying to repair its country's ruined economic state will undoubtedly have problems and opposition, but the Bolshevik party had another great burden - to turn Russia into a Marxist state. Lenin isolated the majority of Russia in 1917 by forming many decrees and taking various actions, mostly ruled by ideology, for example, censorship, he took away freedom of speech from every non-Bolshevik party. These actions were all during the first of Lenin's economy policies - State Capitalism. This policy wasn't as ideological as the New Economic Policy (NEP) introduced in 1921 where although economic control was relaxed, political control was tightened, but it was a start. ...read more.

Middle

By 1923 the NEP was responsible for 3/4s of all retail trade and in 1926 the economy had almost regained the production rates of 1913. However, the economic policy which without doubt caused the most opposition was War Communism. Every single group turned against Lenin, even including people from his own, towards the end of war communism. Lenin used oppressive and violent tactics to exert control over Russia and the least popular technique was grain requisitioning. He turned the peasants against him almost instantly by sending the Cheka to forcefully take their grain to sell. The peasants resisted by producing the bare minimum, this gradually led to inflation, then famine. 1/5 people died from starvation. By October 1920 the rouble was worth 1% of its 1917 value. ...read more.

Conclusion

Overall, the most successful economic policy was NEP, even though some saw it as disloyalty because they thought some kulaks were exploiting poorer peasants the majority was happy and it was an essential step for Lenin to take. The economy improved greatly because of the NEP, this is shown by the grain harvest rates, in 1921, the end of war communism, 37.6 million tons were produced, and then 4 years into the NEP this doubled to 72.5 million tons. War Communism was such a failure because Lenin used forceful and suppressive tactics which reminded Russia of tsarist times which they had fought for so long to be rid of. Lenin turned the people against him and gained many enemies. Yagmur Ekici ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. The Significance of Lenin in the Bolshevik Revolution (1917-1923)

    Those guilty of harbouring deserters are liable to be shot." - Trotsky 1918. Trotsky did not give empty threats either; he stuck quite pitilessly to his words. For example, after an army battalion attempted to desert, Trotsky had one in ten soldiers executed.

  2. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    According to the data of the Minister of Food....the utmost we are able to support is seven million. These figures are indisputable. On the Northern front famine conditions are already in evidence and the soldiers' rations have been reduced to one and one-half pounds.

  1. War communism and NEP

    Over 20 million Russians would die to the result of famine that brought diseases such as typhus and smallpox.

  2. Soviet State

    Declining real wages were the main lever that forced women into the paid workforce, for families found they could no longer live on a single income. As a result of these changes, the percentage of women in wage-earning employment increased from 27% in 1932 to 35% in 1937.

  1. The significance of Lenin in the Bolshevik Revolution (1917-1923).

    were not as forceful as could have been and that the revolution did not happen as quickly as he wanted. The working class were extremely enthusiastic about the opportunity to decrease hours, increse pay and the standard of working conditions.

  2. Explain why these policies aroused opposition within the Bolsheviks within the USSR?

    Lenin had managed to dodge yet another bullet but knew that desperate action was needed, even if it meant going against his ideological beliefs slightly. By 1921 the economy was in serious trouble due to the strain of seven years of foreign and civil war combined with war communism.

  1. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    Working conditions: Rationing ended in 1935, and then food prices remained stable while wages rose. Many workers still found it possible to change jobs. The Stakhanovite movement gave workers more opportunity to demand better conditions and criticise poor management. Social impact of Stalin?s policies The role and impact of Stalinist

  2. How significant was Lenin between the years 1902-1918 to the formation of the Bolshevik ...

    years of rapid industrialisation, and consequently the need for a large proletariat to secure a communist revolution; as under original Marxist theory. Lenin as a result achieved something thought impossible by fellow Marxists. The writing of the April Theses in April 1917, proved to be of considerable significance in the gaining of support for the Bolshevik party (BP).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work